Side by side

Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50 vs Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50 Compared: 12x weighs a little less, yet its 14 mm eye relief may matter more

Quick verdict

The Diamondback HD 10x50 is the one for a wider view and longer eye relief. Take the 12x50 for stationary distant detail, as long as you can support the binocular. The 12x weighs slightly less, yet its 14 mm eye relief is a bigger trade-off than that small saving.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

Higher power here does not add carrying weight

The 12x50 weighs 1.1 oz less than the 10x50. Decide between them by how the view works for your subject and don’t assume the higher number makes for a heavier kit.

Where this comes from

The weights are 30 and 28.9 oz. Going from 10x to 12x raises magnification by 20%.

The catch

Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50

Lower magnification for a distant subject that stays still

The catch

Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50

Eye relief is short at 14 mm

Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50

Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50

Why pick it
  • More surrounding scene and longer eye relief are what you are after
  • A wider view appeals to you, and you intend to judge the larger calculated exit pupil on your own
The catch
Lower magnification for a distant subject that stays still
See price & reviews on Amazon
Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50

Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50

Why pick it
  • From a supported spot, you watch distant subjects that stay still
The catch
Eye relief is short at 14 mm
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50 vs 12x50. Weight is lower on the 12x, which pays for it in field width and eye relief. Let your distant subject, your glasses and your support plan guide the choice.

For buyers weighing a wider view against more power from a supported position, there are two large-objective Diamondbacks.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • Glasses remain on throughout a long observation

    Begin with the longer eye-relief allowance of the 10x model.

    Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50
    Better fit
    Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50
    Depends
  • A distant target holds still and support is on hand

    12x increases magnification and the body weighs no more.

    Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50
    Good
    Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50
    Better fit
  • In the evening you sweep a broad area

    A wider field and a larger geometric exit pupil come with the 10x.

    Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50
    Better fit
    Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50
    Good
  • A user who shares it has an eye spacing of 58 mm

    Each begins at 60 mm.

    Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50
    Not suitable
    Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50
    Not suitable

In practice

Differences you will notice

Higher power here does not add carrying weight

The 12x50 weighs 1.1 oz less than the 10x50. Decide between them by how the view works for your subject and don’t assume the higher number makes for a heavier kit.

How we worked this out

The weights are 30 and 28.9 oz. Going from 10x to 12x raises magnification by 20%.

If glasses stay on, try the 10x

Eye relief is 3 mm longer on the 10x50. If you leave your glasses on so you can switch quickly between normal vision and the binocular, the fit can matter more than a larger image of the subject.

How we worked this out

The eye relief figures are 17 and 14 mm. Neither guarantees a full view with every frame shape.

In the evening, scene width and image scale diverge

A wider field and a larger calculated exit pupil are both on the 10x50 side. The 12x50 gains image scale for a stationary subject and pays for it with those two allowances.

How we worked this out

The fields measure 315 and 271 ft, which is a 14% reduction on 12x. The calculated exit pupils are 50/10=5 mm and 50/12=4.17 mm.

Option A
Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50

Vortex, Diamondback HD 10x50

Diamondback HD 10x50

With 50 mm objectives, the calculated exit pupil is 5 mm. Before you see this as an easy step up from the 10x42, look at the 60 mm minimum eye spacing and the 30 oz weight.

Best for
More surrounding scene and longer eye relief are what you are after

Facts we checked

  • Magnification: 10x
  • Eye relief of 17 mm
  • Scene width: 315 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Weight: 30 oz
Option B
Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50

Vortex, Diamondback HD 12x50

Diamondback HD 12x50

You get more magnification than the 10x50 and a slightly lower weight. The 14 mm eye relief and narrower field, though, make personal fit harder to get right.

Best for
From a supported spot, you watch distant subjects that stay still

Facts we checked

  • Magnification: 12x
  • Eye relief of 14 mm
  • Scene width: 271 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Weight: 28.9 oz

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50 and Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50 differ
SpecVortex Diamondback HD 10x50Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50In practice
Magnification10x12x12x is 20% above 10x.
Eye relief17 mm14 mmThe 10x gives 3 mm extra.
Scene width315 ft at 1,000 yd271 ft at 1,000 ydWith 12x, 14% of the stated width is lost.
Weight30 oz28.9 oz12x is 1.1 oz lighter.
Calculated exit pupil5 mm, calculated4.17 mm, calculatedMeasured brightness isn’t ranked by this geometric result.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50

  • A little heavier, at 30 oz

With Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50

  • The field is narrower and the calculated exit pupil is smaller

Change of plan

When the answer changes

Glasses fit and sweeping a wider area count most

Go with Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50. With the 10x you get more eye relief and also more scene width.

The subject holds still and the job is extra image scale

Go with Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50. With a suitable support plan, the 12x trade is worthwhile.

The binocular has to close down to an eye spacing of 58 mm

Neither model fits. Neither goes past 60 mm.

Decision guide

How to decide

Go with the Diamondback HD 10x50 if you want the wider view and longer eye relief, and with the 12x50 if distant stationary detail matters and you can support the binocular. The 12x weighs slightly less, but the 14 mm eye relief it trades away counts for more than that small saving.

01

Higher power here does not add carrying weight

Weighing 1.1 oz less than the 10x50, the 12x50 is the lighter of the pair. Decide by how the view works for your subject and do not assume the higher number means a heavier kit. The weights are 30 and 28.9 oz, and magnification rises from 10x to 12x, a 20% increase.

02

If glasses stay on, try the 10x

Eye relief is 3 mm longer on the 10x50. When your glasses stay on so you can flip quickly between normal vision and the binocular, fit can matter more than a larger subject image. The figures are 17 and 14 mm, and neither guarantees a full view with every frame shape.

03

In the evening, scene width and image scale diverge

A wider field and a larger calculated exit pupil both belong to the 10x50. The 12x50 buys image scale for a stationary subject and pays with those two allowances. The fields are 315 and 271 ft, a 14% reduction on 12x, and the calculated exit pupils are 50/10=5 mm and 50/12=4.17 mm.

Check these before you buy

  • Verify whether the listing is the 10x50 or the 12x50, and allow for any tripod adapter and support on top of the supplied harness.
  • Check eye spacing, eyecup position and the full view while wearing your own glasses. Treat eye-relief figures as a way to screen options.
  • The supplied case, caps and any harness take up room and add weight. Body dimensions alone do not guarantee that it fits your bag.

What this page can’t tell you

  • This all rests on manufacturer specifications and comparisons that can be reproduced. It involves no hands-on tests of sharpness, steadiness or brightness.
  • Dividing objective diameter by magnification gives the exit pupil. That figure does not establish measured light transmission or a winner in low light.
  • Neither published eye relief nor body dimensions guarantees a personal glasses fit or clearance inside a packed case.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the binoculars we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
2 models
Sources
2 covering these models
Product data updated
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
Vortex Diamondback HD 10x50
  • More surrounding scene and longer eye relief are what you are after
  • A wider view appeals to you, and you intend to judge the larger calculated exit pupil on your own
  • Magnification: 10x
  • Eye relief of 17 mm
  • Scene width: 315 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Weight: 30 oz
  • Calculated exit pupil: 5 mm, calculated
Vortex Diamondback HD 12x50
  • From a supported spot, you watch distant subjects that stay still
  • A tighter view is a fair price to you for 20% more magnification
  • Magnification: 12x
  • Eye relief of 14 mm
  • Scene width: 271 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Weight: 28.9 oz
  • Calculated exit pupil: 4.17 mm, calculated

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money