The catch
BISSELL Little Green
With such a short attachment hose, you end up repositioning the body around a sofa or vehicle.
Side by side
BISSELL Little Green 1400B vs Shark StainStriker PX201, Compared: Shark’s bundle adds a wide tool and Little Green stretches outlet reach
Quick verdict
For occasional spills, Little Green 1400B is the better choice if you like one solution tank and a longer cord. StainStriker PX201 is the better choice for its separate OXY formula system and its current small-plus-wide tool bundle. Either way, you still scrub and extract by hand, and cleanup comes after the stain is gone.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
Little Green has 25% more cord
The 15-foot cord stretches three feet beyond Shark's listed 12-foot cord.
Where this comes from
(15 - 12) ÷ 12 × 100 = 25%. Usable reach shrinks with furniture routing, outlet location and slack.
The catch
Shark StainStriker Portable
Keeping the dual-formula routine going means stocking two compatible products.
BISSELL Little Green
- Why pick it
- Occasional household spills call for a simple setup.
- Reaching the sofa or vehicle is easier with a 15-foot cord.
- The catch
- With such a short attachment hose, you end up repositioning the body around a sofa or vehicle.
Shark StainStriker Portable
- Why pick it
- A wide hand tool alongside a small one is what you want.
- Stocking Deep Clean Pro and OXY separately doesn't bother you.
- The catch
- Keeping the dual-formula routine going means stocking two compatible products.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
What this page compares
Little Green 1400B and Shark StainStriker PX201, set side by side on everyday spills, two-formula setup, cord reach and current Amazon tool bundles.
For occasional spills, Little Green 1400B is the better choice if you like one solution tank and a longer cord. StainStriker PX201 is the better choice for its separate OXY formula system and its current small-plus-wide tool bundle. Either way, you still scrub and extract by hand, and cleanup comes after the stain is gone.
Which one fits
Pick the situations that sound like you
I only deal with the odd spill and want things simple
Little Green runs on a single prepared solution tank. With Shark's two-formula approach, there is an extra reservoir you must keep stocked.
- BISSELL Little Green
- Better fit
- Shark StainStriker Portable
- Good
I need a wide tool for a bigger cushion
A seven-inch tool is confirmed by the current PX201 listing. On BISSELL's official 1400B page the stain tool listed is smaller, and Amazon accessory packs can differ.
- BISSELL Little Green
- Depends
- Shark StainStriker Portable
- Better fit
The closest outlet to me is in an awkward spot
The cords are listed at 15 feet and 12 feet. You only benefit from that three-foot gap if the route around furniture stays clear.
- BISSELL Little Green
- Better fit
- Shark StainStriker Portable
- Good
I need to be sure the machine is lighter
BISSELL lists 9.65 lb. Shark's current page, though, gives a marketing weight that conflicts with its specification weight. That gives no basis for naming an exact weight winner.
- BISSELL Little Green
- Depends
- Shark StainStriker Portable
- Depends
Mostly I have to wash carpet across whole rooms
Each depends on a handheld cleaning head, so the work grows fast once it goes past isolated stains.
- BISSELL Little Green
- Caution
- Shark StainStriker Portable
- Caution
In practice
Differences you will notice
Little Green has 25% more cord
The 15-foot cord stretches three feet beyond Shark's listed 12-foot cord.
How we worked this out
(15 - 12) ÷ 12 × 100 = 25%. Usable reach shrinks with furniture routing, outlet location and slack.
The second formula on Shark is not a second tank of water
Each reservoir does its own job, and they do not run dry at the same time.
How we worked this out
According to the PX200 manual, the main CarpetXpert tank is used up before the StainStriker reservoir. It describes how the dosing system works and does not mean extra interchangeable water capacity.
Rinsing with clean water means setting up the Shark differently
If OXY is still in place, you have not made the switch to a water-only rinse.
How we worked this out
For rinsing, the manual tells you to empty or remove the StainStriker tank and put only water in the main tank. This applies when a final rinse is part of the cleaning routine approved for the fabric.
Option A
BISSELL, 1400B
Little Green
A well-known portable with a 48-ounce tank. You spray, scrub and extract directly on the spot.
- Best for
- Basic upholstery cleaning and the occasional household spill
Facts we checked
- BISSELL's listing gives a 48-ounce tank, 15-foot cord and weight under 10 pounds.
- Separate clean and recovery tanks are used on the 1400B.
- The compact hose tool sprays, scrubs and extracts on carpet and upholstery.
Option B
Shark, PX201
StainStriker Portable
Two formulas get activated at the hand tool of this compact portable, aimed at spots and odors.
- Best for
- Pet spots and vehicle jobs that call for formula activation
Facts we checked
- The PX201 is a portable carpet and upholstery extractor, with Deep Clean Pro and OXY formulas held in separate reservoirs.
- The current official page and the Amazon ASIN both list 3.5-inch and seven-inch tools.
- Shark's listing gives a 12-foot cord and a 4.3-foot hose.
- A hose-cleaning attachment is documented in the manual, which notes that supplied accessories vary.
- A water-only rinse, per the manual, needs the OXY reservoir empty or removed and only water in the main tank.
Spec by spec
Where they really differ
| Spec | BISSELL Little Green | Shark StainStriker Portable | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula routine | Water and a compatible portable-cleaner formula | Main solution tank plus separate OXY reservoir | If you would rather not manage a second formula supply, Little Green is the simpler routine. |
| Cord | 15 ft | 12 ft | Little Green's cord reaches three feet farther. |
| Clean tank information | 48 oz listed | Two supply reservoirs, kept separate | Do not add unlike tank figures, and do not guess carpet coverage from the tank count. |
| Hand-tool selection | Official page lists a 3-inch stain tool, seller kit varies | 3.5-inch and 7-inch tools in the checked listing | Of the two, Shark is the clearer wide-tool choice among those checked. Before buying, confirm the exact BISSELL bundle. |
| Hose-rinse provision | Current official 1400B page lists HydroRinse | Series manual documents a rinse attachment, seller kit varies | You can no longer rely on the old claim that every 1400B lacks HydroRinse. |
| How you clean | Spray, scrub and extract with the hand tool | Spray, scrub and extract with the hand tool | Neither lets you clean a stained cushion hands-free, and neither stops on its own at the right wetness. |
| Best scale of job | Isolated spills and upholstery spots | Isolated spills and upholstery spots | For washing whole rooms over and over, an upright is the more practical place to start. |
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With BISSELL Little Green
- The current official 1400B page lists HydroRinse, but tool packs differ, so confirm what comes in the Amazon carton.
With Shark StainStriker Portable
- Bundles differ from seller to seller. Look at exactly which rinse and pet tools you get, rather than assuming every tool in the family manual comes along.
Change of plan
When the answer changes
One solution tank is what you prefer, and the longer cord gets you to the mess.
Go with BISSELL Little Green. These Little Green advantages are confirmed, and none relies on a suction claim nobody has verified.
What counts more is a confirmed seven-inch hand tool along with the separate OXY system.
Go with Shark StainStriker Portable. The PX201 bundle that was checked includes the broad tool, and its manual walks through the two-reservoir workflow.
Decision guide
How to decide
If you prefer one solution tank and a longer cord for occasional spills, take Little Green 1400B. If the separate OXY formula system and the current small-plus-wide tool bundle appeal, take StainStriker PX201. Scrubbing and extraction stay manual on both, and cleanup follows once the stain is gone.
Pick for the mess you really deal with
Both machines are the right size for a spilled drink on one chair. When cleaning only happens now and then, Little Green's simpler tank routine is a plus. Shark's current seven-inch tool offers another option for a broader area, though a wider tool doesn't prove faster stain removal. How many spray and dry passes you need still depends on the fabric and the spill.
Don't trust a vague no-premix promise
OXY stays separate on the Shark until you use it. The manual still has you add water and Deep Clean Pro to marked levels in the main tank. What you get is a different formula system. You do not get out of preparation, and you can't swap in household detergents. Look at the replacement formulas together with the machine's Amazon offer.
Verify accessories rather than relying on old model summaries
BISSELL's current page includes HydroRinse for the 1400B, but seller images and packs may not match. Shark's family guide also shows accessories that don't come with every unit. Count the contents of the listing as part of your decision, and don't pick a machine for a tool that isn't in the box.
What this page can’t tell you
- Watts, tank size and marketing claims are not used to infer any stain-removal percentage or drying-time advantage.
- Hose length is inconsistent on the 1400B page, and weight is inconsistent on the PX201 page. Neither inconsistency is used to declare a numerical winner.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the carpet cleaners we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
How many fit
Only 1 of the 22 models checked meet every need here: “Spills and isolated stains are mostly what I clean”, “A direct manual workflow is my preference”, “Sofas and fabric chairs are on my cleaning list”, and “Vehicle seats and carpet are what I want to clean”.
1 model fits, out of 22 checkedShow the facts and the math
How we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “Spills and isolated stains are mostly what I clean”, “A direct manual workflow is my preference”, “Sofas and fabric chairs are on my cleaning list”, and “Vehicle seats and carpet are what I want to clean”. A need with no documented match is not counted.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| BISSELL Little Green |
|
|
|
| Shark StainStriker Portable |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
See today’s price and what owners say
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
BISSELL Little Green
Occasional household spills call for a simple setup.
See price & reviews on AmazonShark StainStriker Portable
A wide hand tool alongside a small one is what you want.
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money