The catch
BenQ MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook
60Hz is the most this screen can do.
Side by side
BenQ MA320U vs Dell S2725QC: Dell doubles refresh in less desk width, while BenQ makes the same 4K picture larger
Quick verdict
The two share the same 4K pixel dimensions, so the bigger BenQ changes how large things look. The number of native pixels stays the same. MA320U is the one for a MacBook-centered desk that benefits from a larger 31.5-inch screen and up to 90W USB-C power. S2725QC wins if 27 inches is the better fit and 120Hz counts for more than the higher charging ceiling.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
On the bigger panel, the same desktop takes up more physical space
Each screen has 3840 by 2160 pixels. With the operating-system scaling held the same, MA320U stretches them across a 31.5-inch panel instead of 27 inches, so identical text and windows come out physically larger.
Where this comes from
Dividing 31.5 by 27 gives about 1.17. That puts equal-scale elements about 17% larger physically on the larger panel, which has the same shape. It's a matter of geometry and not a legibility test.
The catch
Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor
Laptop power over USB-C maxes out at 65W.
BenQ MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook
- Why pick it
- Get a bigger 4K picture without changing desktop scaling
- Charge a compatible laptop that needs over 65W but no more than 90W
- The catch
- 60Hz is the most this screen can do.
Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor
- Why pick it
- Run 4K at up to 120Hz
- Stay within the 27-inch screen class
- The catch
- Laptop power over USB-C maxes out at 65W.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
What this page compares
Which suits a home desk, MA320U or S2725QC? The comparison covers a larger MacBook workspace, laptop charging above 65W and 60Hz versus 120Hz.
The two share the same 4K pixel dimensions, so the bigger BenQ changes how large things look. The number of native pixels stays the same. MA320U is the one for a MacBook-centered desk that benefits from a larger 31.5-inch screen and up to 90W USB-C power. S2725QC wins if 27 inches is the better fit and 120Hz counts for more than the higher charging ceiling.
Which one fits
Pick the situations that sound like you
Give the same 4K desktop a bigger physical size
The pixel dimensions are identical, but the larger panel is MA320U.
- BenQ MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook
- Better fit
- Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor
- Good
Require 120Hz
60Hz is the limit for MA320U.
- BenQ MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook
- Not suitable
- Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor
- Better fit
Power a compatible laptop that needs an 80W USB-C profile
Dell's ceiling is 65W and BenQ's is 90W.
- BenQ MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook
- Good
- Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor
- Not suitable
Plug two laptops into two USB-C video inputs
Both offer just one upstream USB-C video input.
- BenQ MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook
- Not suitable
- Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor
- Not suitable
In practice
Differences you will notice
On the bigger panel, the same desktop takes up more physical space
Each screen has 3840 by 2160 pixels. With the operating-system scaling held the same, MA320U stretches them across a 31.5-inch panel instead of 27 inches, so identical text and windows come out physically larger.
How we worked this out
Dividing 31.5 by 27 gives about 1.17. That puts equal-scale elements about 17% larger physically on the larger panel, which has the same shape. It's a matter of geometry and not a legibility test.
A laptop that needs 80W is where the charging options split
If your laptop takes an 80W USB-C profile during the workload you have in mind, MA320U's 90W ceiling can meet the wattage requirement, as long as the cable and the negotiated profile match. S2725QC's 65W ceiling can't.
How we worked this out
Treat the 80W figure as a hypothetical requirement. It sits above 65W and below 90W, yet power negotiation decides the supply a laptop will accept.
A second USB-C port does not turn either monitor into a dock for two laptops
Both monitors give you one upstream USB-C video connection plus a downstream USB-C accessory socket. Either works for a single attached laptop. A second computer is a separate video and peripheral-routing problem.
How we worked this out
According to the port-role lists, each model has a single video/data upstream path. Charging accessories downstream is a different thing from the main laptop power-delivery rating.
Option A
BenQ, MA320U
MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook
MacBook users get 90-watt charging and familiar brightness controls from this roomy matte 4K display, and no Thunderbolt dock is needed.
- Best for
- Get a bigger 4K picture without changing desktop scaling
Facts we checked
- Size and pixel grid: 31.5-inch, 3840 by 2160
- Top refresh rate: 60Hz
- Laptop charging over USB-C: Up to 90W
- USB-C jobs: One upstream for video and data, one downstream port for accessories
Option B
Dell, S2725QC
27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor
This simpler 27-inch home-office screen from Dell offers 4K resolution, 120Hz refresh, USB-C charging and speakers.
- Best for
- Run 4K at up to 120Hz
Facts we checked
- Size and pixel grid: 27-inch, 3840 by 2160
- Top refresh rate: 120Hz
- Laptop charging over USB-C: Up to 65W
- USB-C jobs: One upstream for video and data, one downstream port for accessories
Spec by spec
Where they really differ
| Spec | BenQ MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook | Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Panel size and grid | 31.5-inch, 3840 by 2160 | 27-inch, 3840 by 2160 | An identical native desktop grid at a different physical size. |
| Refresh ceiling | 60Hz | 120Hz | Screen size can matter less than motion requirements. |
| USB-C laptop power | Up to 90W | Up to 65W | Whether the charger stays depends on the profile the laptop accepts and its workload. |
| USB-C roles | One video/data upstream and one downstream accessory port | One video/data upstream and one downstream accessory port | Neither second USB-C socket works as a further laptop video input. |
| Built-in audio | Two 3W speakers | Two 5W speakers | Basic onboard playback comes with both, and no measured sound-quality winner is claimed. |
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With BenQ MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook
- Neither extra native pixels nor a second USB-C video input comes with the larger panel.
With Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor
- At equal scaling, the smaller panel means a physically smaller desktop.
Change of plan
When the answer changes
What matters most is physically larger text at the same scaling and charging up to 90W
Go with BenQ MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook. The larger panel and the higher charging ceiling both belong to MA320U.
I want 120Hz, and my laptop's needs fit within 65W
Go with Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor. That confirmed power brief is met by S2725QC, which also supports 120Hz.
Decision guide
How to decide
Size and power point to MA320U, where a 31.5-inch screen and up to 90W USB-C suit a MacBook-centered desk. If 27 inches is the right size and 120Hz is worth more to you than the higher charging ceiling, S2725QC is the answer. Because both have the same 4K pixel dimensions, the BenQ's extra size changes physical viewing size and adds no native pixels.
On the bigger panel, the same desktop takes up more physical space
Each screen has 3840 by 2160 pixels. With operating-system scaling set the same, MA320U stretches those pixels across 31.5 inches instead of 27, so text and windows come out physically larger. That is worth having if the size works at your seating distance. It does not automatically put more application content on screen, though. If the smaller panel fits your desk and you would end up raising scaling on the larger one anyway, Dell is the better choice.
A laptop that needs 80W is where the charging options split
Suppose your laptop accepts an 80W USB-C profile for the work you plan to do. MA320U tops out at 90W and can meet that requirement when the cable and the negotiated profile line up. S2725QC's 65W ceiling cannot. A confirmed single-cable setup like that is the reason to go with the BenQ. If the laptop sits comfortably within 65W, the higher ceiling may add little, and Dell's 120Hz capability becomes the more relevant difference.
A second USB-C port does not turn either monitor into a dock for two laptops
On both monitors, one USB-C port is the upstream video connection and the other is a downstream socket for accessories. Either works for a single attached laptop. A second computer is a separate problem of video and peripheral routing. Plugging a second laptop into the downstream socket will not give you another display input or equivalent charging. If you switch between two hosts often, look at a monitor with a documented KVM or budget for the accessories you would need.
What this page can’t tell you
- No test of Mac color matching, readability or speaker quality is claimed. The 17% geometry example only holds when scaling is equal and both screens share the 16:9 shape.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the computer monitors we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Show the facts and the math
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| BenQ MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook |
|
| |
| Dell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor |
|
|
Ready to buy
See today’s price and what owners say
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
BenQ MA Series 32-inch 4K Monitor for MacBook
Get a bigger 4K picture without changing desktop scaling
See price & reviews on AmazonDell 27 Plus 4K USB-C Monitor
Run 4K at up to 120Hz
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money