Side by side

ZOWIE XL2566X+ vs ASUS XG27ACS: BenQ calls for high Full HD frame rates, while ASUS balances QHD detail with gaming

Quick verdict

Players who can sustain very high Full HD frame rates and value DyAc 2 motion clarity are the audience for the XL2566X+. For everyday users, the XG27ACS offers QHD detail, IPS color and a more balanced 180Hz ceiling.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

The catch

BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor

To reach its speed, the Full HD TN panel sacrifices resolution, viewing angles and color depth.

The catch

ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor

Its USB-C power delivery covers small devices. It cannot power a laptop.

BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor

BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor

Why pick it
  • Most of your play is competitive shooters
  • Close to 400 frames per second is something your PC can sustain
The catch
To reach its speed, the Full HD TN panel sacrifices resolution, viewing angles and color depth.
See price & reviews on Amazon
ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor

ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor

Why pick it
  • You care about QHD detail beyond games
  • You prefer IPS viewing angles
The catch
Its USB-C power delivery covers small devices. It cannot power a laptop.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

A specialist 400Hz TN monitor goes up against a sharper, all-round 180Hz IPS screen.

This one comes down to resolution and refresh first, then to the limits of your own setup.

Day to day

How each one fits your routine

The competitive display has to get through the working day too

On a desk divided between gaming and two side-by-side document windows, XG27ACS gives each window a wider native grid. XL2566X’s high-refresh Full HD focus may still be the deliberate pick when competition dominates the purchase. Before you settle on the gaming specialization, decide how much zooming and horizontal scrolling the working layout can tolerate. Neither refresh figure promises the frame rate a particular computer will deliver.

Where this comes from

Before interface borders, an even split gives 960 pixels per window on 1920-wide Full HD and 1280 on 2560-wide QHD. Usable logical space changes with application scaling.

A USB-C laptop still needs a power plan of its own

A compatible laptop’s USB-C video signal works with the ASUS, but its 7.5W power rating is no replacement for a normal 65W laptop supply. If that is what the computer requires, plan separate charging. Choose ASUS for connection convenience if this two-cable arrangement is acceptable. Choose the BenQ for a verified competitive PC connection, and do not expect either gaming refresh specification to power the source computer.

Where this comes from

In the XG27ACS specification, DisplayPort Alt Mode and 7.5W power delivery are listed separately. A video connection that works says nothing about whether the laptop’s charging requirement is met.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • Frames as visible as possible in competitive games

    BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor lists “400Hz” for refresh, while ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor lists “180Hz”. This affects how smooth motion looks and what recording or hardware it asks for.

    BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor
    Better fit
    ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor
    Good
  • Code and documents with crisp text

    Small type stays legible thanks to a suitable pixel density and panel layout.

    BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor
    Depends
    ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor
    Better fit
  • A smaller desk gets a focused screen

    Screen size and stand depth stay reasonable when the work surface is limited.

    BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor
    Better fit
    ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor
    Depends
  • Adjustable height, tilt and rotation

    BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor lists “Fast TN” for panel, while ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor lists “Fast IPS”. This shapes setup and day-to-day use more than the core physical job.

    BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor
    Good
    ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor
    Better fit
  • Video and peripherals share one USB-C cable

    BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor lists “1920 by 1080” for resolution, while ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor lists “2560 by 1440”. This affects image compatibility, placement or picture quality. Compare matching standards before you call either label the winner.

    BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor
    Depends
    ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor
    Better fit
  • A screen that stays comfortable for everyday office work

    ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor balances clear text, useful screen area and controls suited to long work sessions.

    BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor
    Depends
    ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor
    Better fit
Option A
BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor

BenQ, XL2566X+

ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor

Tournament-style play is the target of this compact Fast TN panel, which chases motion visibility at 400Hz and adds DyAc 2 and physical side shields.

Best for
Most of your play is competitive shooters

Facts we checked

  • Resolution: 1920 by 1080
  • Refresh: 400Hz
  • Panel: Fast TN
  • 24.1-inch panel, 1920 by 1080 at 400Hz.
Option B
ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor

ASUS, XG27ACS

ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor

Practical and mainstream, this gaming screen has a 180Hz Fast IPS panel, an adjustable stand and a compact USB-C input.

Best for
You care about QHD detail beyond games

Facts we checked

  • Resolution: 2560 by 1440
  • Refresh: 180Hz
  • Panel: Fast IPS
  • 27-inch panel, 2560 by 1440 at up to 180Hz.

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor and ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor differ
SpecBenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports MonitorASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming MonitorIn practice
Resolution1920 by 10802560 by 1440It bears on image compatibility, placement or picture quality. Before you name either label the winner, compare the matching standards.
Refresh400Hz180HzHow smooth motion looks, and what recording or hardware it asks for, depends on this.
PanelFast TNFast IPSSetup and everyday use depend on it more than the core physical job does.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor

  • A work setup finds no USB-C input and no built-in USB hub here.

With ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor

  • The edge-lit IPS panel holds back local contrast and HDR impact.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the computer monitors we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
2 models
Sources
3 covering these models
Product data updated
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
BenQ ZOWIE 24-inch 400Hz Esports Monitor
  • Most of your play is competitive shooters
  • Close to 400 frames per second is something your PC can sustain
  • You would use DyAc 2 and side shields
  • Resolution: 1920 by 1080
  • Refresh: 400Hz
  • Panel: Fast TN
  • 24.1-inch panel, 1920 by 1080 at 400Hz.
ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch QHD Gaming Monitor
  • You care about QHD detail beyond games
  • IPS viewing angles suit you
  • A ceiling of 180Hz is plenty
  • Resolution: 2560 by 1440
  • Refresh: 180Hz
  • Panel: Fast IPS
  • 27-inch panel, 2560 by 1440 at up to 180Hz.
  • USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode plus 7.5W power delivery.

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money