The catch
Dell 27 Plus 4K Monitor
This model is the S2725QS, which has no USB-C video. Do not confuse it with the S2725QC.
Side by side
Go for the S2725QS if you want sharper 4K desktop text and detailed games. The LG 27GR83Q suits fast competitive games where a capable PC can use 240Hz at QHD.
Before you buy
S2725QS is about 163.2 pixels per inch, and 27GR83Q-B is 108.8. The denser panel can draw finer text at the same logical size, while workspace depends on comfortable scaling.
Where this comes from
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Entered values are 3840 × 2160 at 27 inches and 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches. Using published nominal diagonals makes the results approximate.
The catch
This model is the S2725QS, which has no USB-C video. Do not confuse it with the S2725QC.
The catch
Setting 240Hz does not mean your games will render at 240 frames per second.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
Sharper 4K desktop text and detailed games favor the S2725QS. For fast competitive games where a capable PC can use 240Hz at QHD, the LG 27GR83Q is the fit.
More pixels are left to the GPU to shade on the Dell
Which one fits
Against LG's 2560 × 1440, S2725QS supplies 3840 × 2160 pixels. Dell has the denser native image at the same 27-inch diagonal.
Compared with Dell at 120 Hz in 4K, 27GR83Q offers 240 Hz at QHD. The game and PC have to deliver enough frames for that ceiling to pay off.
In S2725QS, 4K resolution goes with a 120 Hz limit. LG has a higher refresh ceiling but cannot provide a native 4K image.
Compared with Dell's 120 Hz ceiling, LG's 240 Hz mode provides twice the refresh opportunities. How motion looks also depends on game frame delivery and pixel response.
In practice
S2725QS is about 163.2 pixels per inch, and 27GR83Q-B is 108.8. The denser panel can draw finer text at the same logical size, while workspace depends on comfortable scaling.
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. Entered values are 3840 × 2160 at 27 inches and 2560 × 1440 at 27 inches. Using published nominal diagonals makes the results approximate.
Per frame, S2725QS draws 8.3 million native pixels and 27GR83Q-B draws 3.7 million. The refresh ceilings are 120Hz and 240Hz respectively.
Native pixels = width × height. Refresh interval =1000 / Hz, which yields 8.3 and 4.2 ms. Treat these as signal and cadence calculations and not as measured frame rates, input lag or pixel response.
Native pixels run 125% higher on Dell, and the refresh ceiling on LG is twice as high.
3840 × 2160 / (2560 × 1440) = 2.25 and 240 / 120 = 2. Measured game performance is not predicted by either ratio.

Dell, S2725QS
Sharp text, spreadsheets and relaxed gaming all sit comfortably on this 27-inch 4K screen with 120Hz refresh. It's meant for a desktop, or for a laptop that already has a dock.

LG, 27GR83Q-B
High-frame-rate games get more headroom on this 240Hz IPS monitor, which keeps the familiar 27-inch QHD layout. Because it has HDMI 2.1, compare the input specification with your graphics card.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Dell 27 Plus 4K Monitor | LG UltraGear 27-inch QHD 240Hz | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 2560 × 1440 | Usable logical workspace changes with operating-system scaling. |
| Panel diagonal | 27 in | 27 in | The measured active diagonal may differ slightly from a nominal screen class. |
| Maximum refresh | 120Hz | 240Hz | Look at the exact input, resolution and overclock conditions. |
| Panel technology | IPS | IPS | A measured color or motion winner is not established by panel type alone. |
| Laptop power | No USB-C laptop charging | No USB-C laptop charging | For the desired delivery, the host, cable and negotiated power profile all have to support it. |
| Chassis width | Check exact drawing | Check exact drawing | Leave additional room for cables, arms and neighboring equipment. |
| Stand depth | Check exact drawing | Check exact drawing | More desk depth can be taken by the included stand than by the display cabinet. |
Trade-offs
Decision guide
Pick the S2725QS for sharper 4K desktop text and detailed games, and the LG 27GR83Q for fast competitive games on a PC that can use 240Hz at QHD.
Pixel count at 4K is 2.25 times that of QHD. That compares workloads and does not guarantee that frame rate falls by the same factor.
A new refresh can arrive every 4.17 ms at 240Hz, against 8.33 ms at 120Hz. Game frame time, response behavior and input latency still affect the result.
USB-C video and charging are missing from both in these records. For a laptop, add the required display cable and a separate charging plan.
By the numbers
What we found across the computer monitors we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
This guide keeps all 50 models in play. The pick rests on the facts and trade-offs on this page.
50 models fit, out of 50 checkedLG UltraGear 27-inch QHD 240Hz lists 240 Hz for top refresh rate, 100% more than the 120 Hz on Dell 27 Plus 4K Monitor.
How we countedNo needs are preselected here. Open the matcher and add the ones that apply to your home, room or setup.
How we calculatedFigures use the fastest published refresh mode. Resolution, connection and color settings decide when you get that rate. For context, 44 of 50 models publish comparable figures.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell 27 Plus 4K Monitor | None of these needs is a documented match |
|
|
| LG UltraGear 27-inch QHD 240Hz | None of these needs is a documented match |
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Look at fine text and 4K detail
See price & reviews on Amazon
Put fast QHD gaming first
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money