Side by side

Dell U3225QE vs LG 32GR93U: Dell can dock a work laptop, whereas LG suits desktop gaming where USB-C power is not needed

Quick verdict

Take the U3225QE for a work laptop and a capable Thunderbolt hub. If you have a desktop gaming setup with no need for USB-C charging or desk docking, the LG 32GR93U suits.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

Detail should be compared at the actual screen size

U3225QE is about 139.9 pixels per inch, and 32GR93U-B is 139.9 too. The pixel densities are close enough that layout and connection needs are the stronger separators.

Where this comes from

Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. The inputs are 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches and 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches. Because the diagonals are published nominal values, these figures are approximate.

The catch

Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

Compared with the 27-inch UltraSharp, the 31.5-inch panel takes up more desk width.

The catch

LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz

Unlike a docking monitor, it offers no USB-C video or laptop charging.

Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

Why pick it
  • Hook up a work laptop and peripherals
  • Require high-power USB-C charging
The catch
Compared with the 27-inch UltraSharp, the 31.5-inch panel takes up more desk width.
See price & reviews on Amazon
LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz

LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz

Why pick it
  • Game on a desktop PC
  • Aim for a 144Hz gaming ceiling
The catch
Unlike a docking monitor, it offers no USB-C video or laptop charging.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

A work laptop and a capable Thunderbolt hub point to the U3225QE. The LG 32GR93U suits a desktop gaming setup where USB-C charging and desk docking are unnecessary.

The screen canvases are nearly the same

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • Use USB-C to connect and charge a work laptop

    The Thunderbolt-centered hub and USB-C laptop video come with U3225QE. LG 32GR93U has no USB-C video or charging.

    Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
    Better fit
    LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz
    Not suitable
  • Game on a desktop PC

    For a separately connected desktop, 32GR93U provides a 4K gaming screen up to 144 Hz. Dell reaches 120 Hz and adds laptop-docking features.

    Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
    Depends
    LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz
    Better fit
  • Require high-power USB-C charging

    Up to 140 W of USB-C laptop power is provided by U3225QE. LG supplies no USB-C charging, so that requirement needs another power route.

    Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
    Better fit
    LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz
    Not suitable
  • Aim for a 144Hz gaming ceiling

    Dell stops at 120 Hz, while LG reaches 144 Hz at 4K. Confirm that the source and connection support the intended 4K timing.

    Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
    Not suitable
    LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz
    Better fit

In practice

Differences you will notice

Detail should be compared at the actual screen size

U3225QE is about 139.9 pixels per inch, and 32GR93U-B is 139.9 too. The pixel densities are close enough that layout and connection needs are the stronger separators.

How we worked this out

Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. The inputs are 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches and 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches. Because the diagonals are published nominal values, these figures are approximate.

Keep native detail apart from game speed

U3225QE draws 8.3 million native pixels per frame, and 32GR93U-B draws 8.3 million as well. Refresh ceilings are 120Hz and 144Hz respectively.

How we worked this out

Native pixels = width × height. Refresh interval =1000 / Hz, so the results are 8.3 and 6.9 ms. They are signal and cadence calculations and not measured frame rates, input lag or pixel response.

Docking is added and the Dell stand takes about 63 mm less depth

Besides supplying the USB-C power route absent on LG, the U3225QE stand is 63.12 mm shallower than 32GR93U.

How we worked this out

278 - 214.88 = 63.12 mm. Dell lists 140W USB-C, and LG has no USB-C video or charging.

Option A
Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

Dell, U3225QE

UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

On a desk where you want fewer separate boxes, this larger 4K work screen offers 120Hz scrolling, 140-watt charging and a Thunderbolt hub.

Best for
Demanding laptop work on a large desk run through one cable

Facts we checked

  • IPS Black panel at 120Hz, 31.5-inch, 3840 by 2160
  • Up to 140 watts from Thunderbolt 4
  • With its stand, 713.2 mm wide and 214.88 mm deep
Option B
LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz

LG, 32GR93U-B

UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz

Games get more physical room on this flat 32-inch 4K screen, and there are plenty of pixels left for work. A 144Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 inputs make it a simple choice for both PC and console.

Best for
PC and console gaming on a large, flat 4K screen

Facts we checked

  • 144Hz IPS panel in the 32-inch class at 3840 by 2160
  • The stand pivots and adjusts in height, and the inputs are HDMI 2.1
  • DisplayHDR 400, with 95 percent DCI-P3 coverage

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor and LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz differ
SpecDell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub MonitorLG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144HzIn practice
Native resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160Usable logical workspace changes with operating-system scaling.
Panel diagonal31.5 in31.5 inThe measured active diagonal may differ slightly from a nominal screen class.
Maximum refresh120Hz144HzLook at the exact input, resolution and overclock conditions.
Panel technologyIPS BlackIPSA measured color or motion winner is not established by panel type alone.
Laptop powerUp to 140WNo USB-C laptop chargingFor the desired delivery, the host, cable and negotiated power profile all have to support it.
Chassis width713.2 mm714 mmLeave additional room for cables, arms and neighboring equipment.
Stand depth214.88 mm278 mmMore desk depth can be taken by the included stand than by the display cabinet.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

  • A laptop and cable that support it are needed to reach the 140-watt ceiling, and not every laptop will charge at that rate.

With LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz

  • Don't read DisplayHDR 400 certification as OLED black levels or as a local-dimming specification.

Decision guide

How to decide

The U3225QE is for a work laptop and a capable Thunderbolt hub. The LG 32GR93U is for a desktop gaming setup where USB-C charging and desk docking are unnecessary.

01

The screen canvases are nearly the same

31.5-inch 4K panels are used in both. Dell puts its effort into hub features and IPS Black, LG into the gaming connection and motion package.

02

With a laptop, the value calculation changes

Up to 140W and USB-C video come with the Dell. The LG has neither USB-C video nor charging, which can mean another dock or several cables.

03

Stand depth differs by a wide margin

Dell lists 214.88 mm, against 278 mm for LG. That can leave more keyboard space without shrinking the panel.

Check these before you buy

  • Make sure of the exact model suffix, and of the refresh rate your computer supports through the port you will use.
  • Take stand depth and chassis width measurements, and check what the laptop needs for charging and what the cable can do.

What this page can’t tell you

  • The pixel density and refresh interval numbers are arithmetic on published specifications, and no visual-quality or latency test was measured.
  • USB-C power numbers are a negotiated maximum, and a laptop will not necessarily charge at full speed.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the computer monitors we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

How many fit

This guide keeps all 50 models in play. The pick rests on the facts and trade-offs on this page.

50 models fit, out of 50 checked

The gap in numbers

LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz lists 144 Hz for top refresh rate, 20% more than the 120 Hz on Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor.

Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
120 Hz
LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz
144 Hz
Models with this figure
44 of 50
Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
50 models
Sources
5 covering these models
Product data updated

How we countedNo needs are preselected here. Open the matcher and add the ones that apply to your home, room or setup.

How we calculatedFigures use the fastest published refresh mode. Resolution, connection and color settings decide when you get that rate. For context, 44 of 50 models publish comparable figures.

The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
Dell UltraSharp 32 4K Thunderbolt Hub MonitorNone of these needs is a documented match
  • IPS Black panel at 120Hz, 31.5-inch, 3840 by 2160
  • Up to 140 watts from Thunderbolt 4
  • With its stand, 713.2 mm wide and 214.88 mm deep
LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144HzNone of these needs is a documented match
  • 144Hz IPS panel in the 32-inch class at 3840 by 2160
  • The stand pivots and adjusts in height, and the inputs are HDMI 2.1
  • DisplayHDR 400, with 95 percent DCI-P3 coverage

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money