The catch
Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier
A Midea Cube goes longer between emptyings than this 1.7-gallon bucket.
Side by side
A higher moisture load and better standardized efficiency per liter removed point to the 35-pint Frigidaire. If a smaller-capacity unit is enough, the 22-pint model will do. Both come with a 1.7-gallon bucket and Wi-Fi, which means the bigger rating adds extraction headroom and not a larger water reservoir.
Before you buy
Per day, the 35-pint model gains 13.28 certified pints.
Where this comes from
Gain: (35.85 −22.57) ÷22.57 ×100 =58.8%.
The catch
A Midea Cube goes longer between emptyings than this 1.7-gallon bucket.
The catch
It has no way to pump water uphill.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
Frigidaire's 22- and 35-pint Wi-Fi dehumidifiers compared on standardized extraction, energy per liter and the shared bucket that still has to be emptied.
Which one fits
A 22-pint unit that is sufficient does not need replacing just for a bigger name.
Standardized capacity is materially higher on the 35.
At the certification conditions, its 2.01 L/kWh figure is above 1.70.
A 1.7-gallon reservoir stays on both.
In practice
Per day, the 35-pint model gains 13.28 certified pints.
Gain: (35.85 −22.57) ÷22.57 ×100 =58.8%.
Nominal times at certified rates come to 14.5 versus 9.1 hours.
1.7 ×8 =13.6 US pints. 13.6 ÷22.57 ×24 =14.5 hours, and 13.6 ÷35.85 ×24 =9.1. This assumes a constant test rate.
At the listed efficiencies, removing 10 liters takes about 5.88 versus 4.98 kWh.
10 ÷1.70 =5.88 and 10 ÷2.01 =4.98 kWh. That is a 15.4% reduction and not a forecast of an annual bill.

Frigidaire, FHDD2234W1
An uncomplicated small-room dehumidifier in a familiar upright form, with Wi-Fi and a washable filter.

Frigidaire, FHDD3534Y1
This current 35-pint unit is quiet and efficient, offers three fan speeds and has app control that is useful.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier | Frigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Named capacity | 22 pints per day | 35 pints per day | Extraction headroom is greater in the 35 class. |
| Certified capacity | 22.57 pints per day | 35.85 pints per day | The figures are standardized and specific to each model. |
| Certified efficiency | 1.70 L/kWh | 2.01 L/kWh | Per unit of energy, the 35 removes more water under the test. |
| Bucket | 1.7 US gallons | 1.7 US gallons | A bigger reservoir does not come with more removal capacity. |
| Drain andapp | Gravity drainage and Wi-Fi | Gravity drainage and Wi-Fi | A separate solution is still needed for an elevated drain. |
Trade-offs
Decision guide
Where the moisture load is higher and you want better standardized efficiency per liter removed, the 35-pint Frigidaire is the pick. Where a smaller-capacity unit is sufficient, go with the 22-pint model. Because both have a 1.7-gallon bucket and Wi-Fi, the larger rating gets you extraction headroom and not a bigger water reservoir.
For these exact model numbers, the current records list 22.57 and 35.85 pints per day. The 35-pint version therefore has about 59% more standardized water-removal capacity. That backs choosing the larger unit when the moisture load is harder, though it does not promise your room will dry 59% faster. Real use also depends on infiltration, temperature and the humidity target.
Each cabinet takes a 1.7-US-gallon bucket, which is about 13.6 pints. Suppose each collected nonstop at its own certification rate. The nominal bucket would then fill in about 14.5 hours on the 22 and 9.1 hours on the 35. Treat those as arithmetic examples and not as expected schedules. A unit that removes water faster can mean more bucket trips for exactly that reason, since it collects more.
Certified efficiency is 1.70 liters per kilowatt-hour for the smaller model and 2.01 for the larger. Take the same hypothetical 10 liters removed at those efficiencies and you get about 5.88 versus 4.98 kWh. In that comparison the 35-pint unit uses about 15% less energy for an equal volume of water. Your annual bill still depends on moisture demand, cycling and your electricity rate.
By the numbers
What we found across the dehumidifiers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Only 3 of the 31 models checked meet every need here: “The space I'm drying is a medium room or finished basement”, “Since it will run often, efficiency counts”, and “I want to look at humidity on my phone”.
3 models fit, out of 31 checkedHow we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “The space I'm drying is a medium room or finished basement”, “Since it will run often, efficiency counts”, and “I want to look at humidity on my phone”. A need with no documented match is not counted.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frigidaire 22 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier |
|
| |
| Frigidaire 35 Pint Wi-Fi Dehumidifier |
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Your moisture load is small enough that 35-pint capacity is not needed
See price & reviews on Amazon
More standardized removal capacity is what you need
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money