The catch
CalDigit TS5 Plus
Its 10GbE advantage depends on the whole local network and on the Windows driver. The separate 330W adapter needs room too.
Side by side
A desk with 10GbE already in place suits the TS5 Plus, whereas the Anker keeps its power supply in the same box. A fast NAS path, UHS-II card imports or a compatible higher-power TB accessory that fixes a problem you keep running into is the case for the Plus. If 2.5GbE and UHS-I are enough, and the integrated supply tidies up your desk, the Anker is the choice. Host power is 140W on both. On Windows the Plus needs its network driver, and the Anker’s HDMI and DisplayPort are alternatives to one another and cannot be used together.
Before you buy
Fast NAS access can be valuable for family video and creative-work files, but big files alone do not give Plus an edge. Put the NAS behind a 2.5GbE switch and both docks hit the same 2.5Gb/s ceiling. On a 1GbE path both drop to that lower ceiling. Plus is worth a look once the faster path exists and the NAS storage can keep up with it. A Windows laptop managed by an employer adds another condition, because Plus’s Ethernet needs a driver. For the network you already have installed, Anker can be the simpler match, even in a household with a large media library. This is reasoning about the local network. It makes no promise about internet speed.
Where this comes from
In the stated switch example, min(10, 2.5)=min(2.5, 2.5)=2.5 Gb/s. Storage, protocol overhead and host throughput are not measured. Whether Windows drivers are permitted is a separate gate.
The catch
Its 10GbE advantage depends on the whole local network and on the Windows driver. The separate 330W adapter needs room too.
The catch
Every downstream TB port tops out at 15W, the card readers are UHS-I, and HDMI and DP cannot run at the same time.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
TS5 Plus vs Anker A83B5 if you have a home NAS, a portable monitor and camera cards. See which of your other equipment makes the flagship upgrade worth having.
Both are premium TB5 docks that compete directly, each with 140W host power, two downstream TB branches and fixed video. The deciding line is whether the rest of your desk can make use of Plus’s stronger accessory connections.
Which one fits
Plus is the only one that gives the dock a 10GbE link.
Each TB port gives 36W on Plus and 15W on Anker. Check the exact PD profile.
Plus’s faster network and reader interfaces go unused under those conditions.
Anker has the supply built in, though ventilation and fan placement still matter.
In practice
Fast NAS access can be valuable for family video and creative-work files, but big files alone do not give Plus an edge. Put the NAS behind a 2.5GbE switch and both docks hit the same 2.5Gb/s ceiling. On a 1GbE path both drop to that lower ceiling. Plus is worth a look once the faster path exists and the NAS storage can keep up with it. A Windows laptop managed by an employer adds another condition, because Plus’s Ethernet needs a driver. For the network you already have installed, Anker can be the simpler match, even in a household with a large media library. This is reasoning about the local network. It makes no promise about internet speed.
In the stated switch example, min(10, 2.5)=min(2.5, 2.5)=2.5 Gb/s. Storage, protocol overhead and host throughput are not measured. Whether Windows drivers are permitted is a separate gate.
Each dock advertises 140W for the laptop, but a portable display on a downstream TB port gets a different power budget. Plus gives up to 36W per downstream port and Anker gives 15W. If a particular screen needs a compatible 20W input at the setting you choose, Plus has enough stated wattage and Anker falls short. The screen’s accepted PD profile and cable still have to match. Anker’s front USB-C charging sockets share 45W, yet they are not video outputs, so that figure cannot answer the single-cable screen question. If the display runs fully within 15W, this particular advantage for Plus disappears.
A conditional 20W display requirement is checked against video-capable downstream ports at 36W and 15W. It is a necessary power threshold. It does not prove protocol compatibility or brightness. Front data-only charging is treated separately.
If you shoot with fast UHS-II cards and have several USB-A accessories, Plus can do away with an external card reader and lessen the need for another USB hub. It does still come with a separate power adapter. Anker gets rid of the external power brick, but its UHS-I readers may leave a camera owner reaching for another reader, and its three USB-A sockets may not cover every plug you want to keep. With UHS-I cards and three or fewer A-shaped devices, Plus’s larger set of accessory connections may add little. List the extra pieces each arrangement needs. A dock that looks tidier on its own can end up needing more gear once the camera and older accessories come into the picture.
The factors are built-in reader classes, five versus three USB-A sockets, and external versus integrated power. It is a conditional tally of equipment, not a blanket claim that every card or accessory needs another device.

CalDigit, TBT5-TS5Plus-US-AMZ
Your 10GbE path is complete, the NAS storage is fast enough to use it, and the Windows driver it needs is permitted.

Anker, A83B5
Your network is going to stay at 2.5GbE or below, and UHS-I cards or a reader you already own handle the camera workflow.
Spec by spec
| Spec | CalDigit TS5 Plus | Anker Prime Thunderbolt 5 A83B5 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local network | 10GbE with required Windows driver | 2.5GbE | If the switch or NAS path is slower, the practical reason to pick the faster port goes away. |
| TB branches and accessory power | Two downstream TB5, up to 36W each | Two downstream TB5, up to 15W each | Both have the same number of branches, but the power a compatible peripheral can draw may differ. |
| Camera cards | UHS-II SD and microSD | UHS-I SD and microSD | The reader class counts together with the card and the destination storage. |
| Fixed screen connection | DisplayPort 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 or DisplayPort 2.1, not both together | An HDMI screen you keep may need an adapter on Plus, yet plug straight into Anker. |
| Power arrangement | Separate 330W supply | Integrated supply | Either dock can deliver up to 140W to a compatible laptop. A bigger external supply does not add host power. |
| USB-A equipment | Five 10Gb/s sockets | Three 10Gb/s sockets | Plan the screens and storage first, then count the plugs you are keeping. |
Trade-offs
Change of plan
Go with CalDigit TS5 Plus. The upgrade can clear a particular bottleneck or do away with an extra accessory.
Go with Anker Prime Thunderbolt 5 A83B5. Anker can simplify the equipment setup without an interface upgrade that would sit unused.
Decision guide
A dock you can keep for a long time is the aim, though paying for capabilities your network, cards and screens cannot use may leave the actual annoyance exactly where it was.
By the numbers
What we found across the docking stations we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| CalDigit TS5 Plus |
|
| |
| Anker Prime Thunderbolt 5 A83B5 |
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Your 10GbE path is complete, the NAS storage is fast enough to use it, and the Windows driver it needs is permitted.
A compatible TB accessory draws more than 15W, or built-in UHS-II saves you from needing a separate card reader.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Your network is going to stay at 2.5GbE or below, and UHS-I cards or a reader you already own handle the camera workflow.
The built-in power supply and a direct HDMI or DP connection both suit your desk, and a second display can go through a supported TB route.
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money