Side by side

Epson ES-500W II vs ES-590W: 590W has you choose filing destinations at the scanner

Quick verdict

Long packets and on-device destinations call for the ES-590W. The ES-500W II is a reasonable fit for smaller wireless batches if settings and filing already happen on your computer or phone.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

One hundred sheets take two loads or one

A 100-sheet job gets split in two by the 50-sheet feeder of the ES-500W II, while the ES-590W takes the whole suitable stack at once. That is a clearer reason to upgrade than wanting a newer scanner for its own sake.

Where this comes from

The capacity figure presumes ordinary paper within the feeder’s thickness limit. You still need to prepare the stack and check it.

The catch

Epson ES-500W II

It has no touchscreen and can't save directly to a USB flash drive.

The catch

Epson ES-590W

Direct USB saving can't write to a password-protected or encrypted memory drive.

Epson ES-500W II

Epson ES-500W II

Why pick it
  • Your usual packets stay within 50 sheets
  • Working from the computer or app is fine with you
The catch
It has no touchscreen and can't save directly to a USB flash drive.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Epson ES-590W

Epson ES-590W

Why pick it
  • You regularly run 51 to 100 sheets through at once
  • Touchscreen jobs or a supported USB memory destination are what you want
The catch
Direct USB saving can't write to a password-protected or encrypted memory drive.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

A 50-sheet wireless feeder faces a 100-sheet touchscreen model here. Fewer reloads and direct USB saving are what can justify the ES-590W.

Long packets and on-device destinations call for the ES-590W. The ES-500W II is a reasonable fit for smaller wireless batches if settings and filing already happen on your computer or phone.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • Thirty sheets sent over Wi-Fi from a computer

    The short wireless job is covered by either.

    Epson ES-500W II
    Good
    Epson ES-590W
    Good
  • A hundred-sheet packet on a busy family evening

    One reload is avoided with the newer feeder.

    Epson ES-500W II
    Caution
    Epson ES-590W
    Better fit
  • Choosing among several filing jobs on the device

    Jobs appear on the touchscreen of the ES-590W.

    Epson ES-500W II
    Caution
    Epson ES-590W
    Better fit
  • Direct destination is a flash drive protected by a password

    Protected drives are excluded by the ES-590W, and the ES-500W II has no direct USB capture.

    Epson ES-500W II
    Not suitable
    Epson ES-590W
    Not suitable

In practice

Differences you will notice

One hundred sheets take two loads or one

A 100-sheet job gets split in two by the 50-sheet feeder of the ES-500W II, while the ES-590W takes the whole suitable stack at once. That is a clearer reason to upgrade than wanting a newer scanner for its own sake.

How we worked this out

The capacity figure presumes ordinary paper within the feeder’s thickness limit. You still need to prepare the stack and check it.

An interruption can cost more than the rated speed difference saves

Feeding 100 sheets continuously takes about 171 seconds at 35 ppm and about 133 seconds at 45 ppm. The gap of roughly 38 seconds leaves out reloading, OCR and saving. For this pair, skipping an extra load may be more noticeable than the raw feed-time saving.

How we worked this out

The 100/35 and 100/45 minute figures rest on published Letter 300 dpi rates. For the ES-590W the rate is explicitly measured over USB.

Having wireless already doesn't make the touchscreen redundant

Wireless scanning works on both, and the ES-590W adds a screen plus direct capture to supported USB memory. Those features count when the scanner is shared and the usual computer is busy. If you already pick every setting in the app, the older model may still handle your whole routine.

How we worked this out

Do not take it that every cloud or editing feature works without a computer. Epson’s requirements for each destination still apply.

Option A
Epson ES-500W II

Epson, ES-500W II

ES-500W II

Work through household or office piles over Wi-Fi, so the scanner doesn't have to sit next to a USB cable.

Best for
Your usual packets stay within 50 sheets

Facts we checked

  • Feeder holds 50 sheets
  • Rate on Letter at 300 dpi: 35 ppm and 70 ipm
  • Controls: Host software and buttons
  • USB flash-drive capture: Absent
Option B
Epson ES-590W

Epson, ES-590W

ES-590W

A 100-sheet feeder and touchscreen destinations make a long paperwork session manageable.

Best for
You regularly run 51 to 100 sheets through at once

Facts we checked

  • Feeder holds 100 sheets
  • Rate on Letter at 300 dpi: 45 ppm and 90 ipm when on USB
  • Controls: On a 4.3-inch touchscreen
  • USB flash-drive capture: Offered, but only for supported drives

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where Epson ES-500W II and Epson ES-590W differ
SpecEpson ES-500W IIEpson ES-590WIn practice
Feeder50 sheets100 sheetsThe ES-590W halves the feeder loads for a 100-sheet job.
Letter 300 dpi rate35 ppm and 70 ipm45 ppm and 90 ipm over USBAny speed difference can be limited to the stated conditions.
ControlsButtons and host software4.3-inch touchscreenYou can select jobs on the newer machine.
USB flash-drive captureNoYes, supported drives onlyNo computer has to be there for that destination.
Wireless scanningYesYesWi-Fi by itself does not justify replacing the ES-500W II.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With Epson ES-500W II

  • Feeding a 100-sheet packet means two loads.

With Epson ES-590W

  • Installed software or an account is still needed for certain editing and cloud workflows.

Change of plan

When the answer changes

Your packets often go past 50 sheets

Go with Epson ES-590W. The practical upgrade is the 100-sheet feeder.

You scan only smaller wireless batches and pick settings in the app

Go with Epson ES-500W II. That existing workflow is covered by the ES-500W II.

Direct capture has to be saved onto encrypted USB storage

Neither model fits. Go with a suitable computer-based workflow.

Decision guide

How to decide

If you have long packets or want on-device destinations, buy the ES-590W. The ES-500W II is a reasonable choice for smaller wireless batches when you already take care of settings and filing from a computer or phone.

01

One hundred sheets take two loads or one

A 100-sheet job gets split in two by the ES-500W II's 50-sheet feeder, but the ES-590W accepts the whole suitable stack once. That is a better reason to upgrade than just wanting a newer scanner. Capacity assumes ordinary paper within the feeder's thickness limit, and preparation and checking still take your attention.

02

An interruption can cost more than the rated speed difference saves

Feeding 100 sheets continuously takes about 171 seconds at 35 ppm and about 133 seconds at 45 ppm. The roughly 38-second gap leaves out reloading, OCR and saving. Here, skipping an extra load may be more noticeable than the raw feed-time saving. The 100/35 and 100/45 minute figures use published Letter 300 dpi rates, and the ES-590W's rate is explicitly measured over USB.

03

Having wireless already doesn't make the touchscreen redundant

Wireless scanning is available on both, but the ES-590W adds a screen and direct capture to a supported USB memory drive. Those features count when the scanner is shared and the usual computer is busy. If you already pick everything in the app, the older model may still cover your whole routine. Don't assume every cloud or editing feature becomes computer-free, because Epson's individual destination requirements still apply.

Check these before you buy

  • Check whether the newer model's on-device destinations fit the way you file.
  • Look at exactly which software is included, and at the requirements for any memory drive you plan to use.

What this page can’t tell you

  • Manufacturer feed ratings leave out document preparation, OCR and saving time.
  • Confirm the supported media, the scan mode, your current operating system and the destination before you purchase.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the document scanners we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
2 models
Sources
2 covering these models
Product data updated
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
Epson ES-500W II
  • Your usual packets stay within 50 sheets
  • Working from the computer or app is fine with you
  • Feeder holds 50 sheets
  • Rate on Letter at 300 dpi: 35 ppm and 70 ipm
  • Controls: Host software and buttons
  • USB flash-drive capture: Absent
  • Wireless scanning: Offered
Epson ES-590W
  • You regularly run 51 to 100 sheets through at once
  • Touchscreen jobs or a supported USB memory destination are what you want
  • Feeder holds 100 sheets
  • Rate on Letter at 300 dpi: 45 ppm and 90 ipm when on USB
  • Controls: On a 4.3-inch touchscreen
  • USB flash-drive capture: Offered, but only for supported drives
  • Wireless scanning: Offered

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money