Side by side

Deeper PRO+ 2 vs CHIRP+ 2 Compared: CHIRP+ reaches farther wirelessly, and the extra runtime assumes GPS is off

Quick verdict

CHIRP+ 2 is worth choosing for the added wireless range or for longer sessions with GPS off. PRO+ 2 already handles GPS shore mapping, publishes the same depth and target-separation limits and takes less time to charge fully.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

That is 20 m of extra reach, or about 66 ft

The published wireless range of CHIRP+ 2 is 20% longer. That can matter if the fishing spot lies beyond the PRO+ 2 limit, though it cannot guarantee a clear link through waves or interference.

Where this comes from

The gap is 120 m minus 100 m, or 20 m. Divide it by 100 m and you get 20%. Converting to feet uses 3.28084 ft per meter.

The catch

Deeper PRO+ 2

CHIRP+ 2 publishes 120 m of Wi-Fi range, while this one lists 100 m.

The catch

Deeper CHIRP+ 2

Simpler castable sonar spares you the setup choices that come with the three-beam CHIRP system, and this one still depends on a phone outdoors.

Deeper PRO+ 2

Deeper PRO+ 2

Why pick it
  • A published Wi-Fi range of 100 m is enough for where you fish
  • You benefit from a shorter full-charge time between trips
The catch
CHIRP+ 2 publishes 120 m of Wi-Fi range, while this one lists 100 m.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Deeper CHIRP+ 2

Deeper CHIRP+ 2

Why pick it
  • More published wireless reach is a must for you
  • You want longer sessions with GPS off
The catch
Simpler castable sonar spares you the setup choices that come with the three-beam CHIRP system, and this one still depends on a phone outdoors.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

Deeper PRO+ 2 and Deeper CHIRP+ 2 weighed up on display and mounting, sonar and depth, charts and bundle.

The differences worth weighing are wireless reach, charging time and GPS use. Published depth and target-separation limits are tied.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • Survey a lake from the bank

    Internal GPS on both makes shore-cast bathymetric mapping possible.

    Deeper PRO+ 2
    Good
    Deeper CHIRP+ 2
    Good
  • Fish out past a 100 m wireless link

    The published connection limit for CHIRP+ 2 is 120 m. Waves, phone position and interference can cut the usable range of either model.

    Deeper PRO+ 2
    Not suitable
    Deeper CHIRP+ 2
    Better fit
  • Fish all day and skip recording GPS positions

    With GPS off, CHIRP+ 2 publishes up to 15 hours. PRO+ 2 lists up to nine hours, depending on usage.

    Deeper PRO+ 2
    Good
    Deeper CHIRP+ 2
    Better fit
  • Charge up fully between short trips

    A full charge takes a stated 75 minutes on PRO+ 2 and 110 minutes on CHIRP+ 2.

    Deeper PRO+ 2
    Better fit
    Deeper CHIRP+ 2
    Good
  • Decide based on maximum depth or narrow-beam separation

    Each publishes a 100 m depth ceiling and 1 cm separation on the narrow beam. Those figures do not show better image quality for either one.

    Deeper PRO+ 2
    Similar
    Deeper CHIRP+ 2
    Similar
  • Stay off a phone while fishing

    Neither has a built-in display, since both send sonar to your phone or tablet.

    Deeper PRO+ 2
    Not suitable
    Deeper CHIRP+ 2
    Not suitable

In practice

Differences you will notice

That is 20 m of extra reach, or about 66 ft

The published wireless range of CHIRP+ 2 is 20% longer. That can matter if the fishing spot lies beyond the PRO+ 2 limit, though it cannot guarantee a clear link through waves or interference.

How we worked this out

The gap is 120 m minus 100 m, or 20 m. Divide it by 100 m and you get 20%. Converting to feet uses 3.28084 ft per meter.

The longer battery headline does not compare mapping runtimes

The stated 15 hours for CHIRP+ 2 applies with GPS off, and its GPS-on claim is nine hours. PRO+ 2 also lists up to nine hours, under broader usage conditions, so the records do not establish a mapping-runtime winner.

How we worked this out

Each manufacturer runtime claim stays tied to its operating mode in the comparison. Nothing about endurance testing is inferred from those claims.

On the stated full charge, PRO+ 2 saves 35 minutes

Published charge times are 75 minutes and 110 minutes. With a short charging window between two trips, PRO+ 2 is the easier fit.

How we worked this out

110 minus 75 equals 35 minutes. These are manufacturer full-charge figures under their stated conditions. BillionFables did not measure them.

Both models share the depth and separation limits

A 100 m depth ceiling, 1 cm narrow-beam separation and 2.4 cm separation on the other beams are listed for both. If you pay for CHIRP+ 2 only to improve those published limits, you would not get a higher rating.

How we worked this out

For each of these three limits, the current exact-model specification tables give the same values.

Option A
Deeper PRO+ 2

Deeper, PRO+ 2

Deeper PRO+ 2

In the named Amazon configuration a transducer is included, and the maker conditions give a listed sonar depth class of 328 feet.

Best for
move it between small boats and fish from a kayak

Facts we checked

  • Under the maker conditions, the listed sonar depth class reaches 328 feet.
  • A transducer comes with the named Amazon configuration.
  • The named configuration leaves out side imaging.
  • The unit supports charting or live mapping.
Option B
Deeper CHIRP+ 2

Deeper, CHIRP+ 2

Deeper CHIRP+ 2

The named Amazon configuration comes with a transducer, and its listed sonar depth class reaches 328 feet under the maker conditions.

Best for
fish from a kayak and carry it from one small boat to another

Facts we checked

  • Under the maker conditions, the listed sonar depth class reaches 328 feet.
  • A transducer comes with the named Amazon configuration.
  • The named configuration leaves out side imaging.
  • The unit supports charting or live mapping.

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where Deeper PRO+ 2 and Deeper CHIRP+ 2 differ
SpecDeeper PRO+ 2Deeper CHIRP+ 2In practice
Published wireless rangeUp to 100 mUp to 120 mWhen conditions allow, CHIRP+ 2 offers a longer stated connection range.
Sonar designThree fixed frequenciesThree CHIRP beamsScanning methods differ, yet the shared separation figures do not put a number on any image-quality improvement.
Depth range15 cm to 100 m15 cm to 100 mThese models cannot be told apart by maximum rated water depth.
Target separation1 cm narrow, 2.4 cm medium or wide1 cm narrow, 2.4 cm medium or wideOn either sonar, pick the beam that suits the job.
Runtime conditionsUp to 9 hours depending on usageUp to 9 hours GPS on, 15 hours GPS offTo get the longer CHIRP headline, you give up GPS recording for that session.
Full-charge time75 minutes110 minutesThe stated turnaround between trips is shorter on PRO+ 2.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With Deeper PRO+ 2

  • Your phone battery, how well you can see its screen and the Wi-Fi conditions all affect mapping and sonar.

With Deeper CHIRP+ 2

  • Waves, interference, phone position and line of sight can all cut into the published range, which is a best-case figure.

Decision guide

How to decide

Go with CHIRP+ 2 if you need more wireless range or want longer sessions with GPS turned off. PRO+ 2 still covers GPS shore mapping, matches its published depth and target-separation limits, and reaches a full charge sooner.

01

Where they differ

Under suitable conditions, CHIRP+ 2 publishes 120 m of Wi-Fi range to the 100 m of PRO+ 2, which is a 20% increase.

02

What changes with the specs

Both units publish a 100 m depth ceiling and 1 cm narrow-beam target separation, and neither limit establishes an advantage for CHIRP+ 2.

03

What you give up

CHIRP+ 2 gets to its 15-hour claim only with GPS off, so do not treat it as 15 hours of GPS shore mapping.

Check these before you buy

  • The exact transducer supplied
  • Mounting site and connector fit
  • Salt-water or fresh-water depth
  • Regional charts
  • Battery size and power draw

What this page can’t tell you

  • Top depth is tied to conditions.
  • The transducer in a bundle may vary with the store.
  • The boat itself can obstruct side-imaging beams.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the fish finders we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

How many fit

11 of the 23 models checked meet every need here: “You fish from a kayak” and “It will move between small boats”.

11 models fit, out of 23 checked
Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
23 models
Sources
2 covering these models
Product data updated

How we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “You fish from a kayak” and “It will move between small boats”. A need with no documented match is not counted.

The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
Deeper PRO+ 2
  • You fish from a kayak
  • It will move between small boats
  • Under the maker conditions, the listed sonar depth class reaches 328 feet.
  • A transducer comes with the named Amazon configuration.
  • The named configuration leaves out side imaging.
Deeper CHIRP+ 2
  • You fish from a kayak
  • It will move between small boats
  • Under the maker conditions, the listed sonar depth class reaches 328 feet.
  • A transducer comes with the named Amazon configuration.
  • The named configuration leaves out side imaging.

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money