The catch
Deeper PRO+ 2
CHIRP+ 2 publishes 120 m of Wi-Fi range, while this one lists 100 m.
Side by side
CHIRP+ 2 is worth choosing for the added wireless range or for longer sessions with GPS off. PRO+ 2 already handles GPS shore mapping, publishes the same depth and target-separation limits and takes less time to charge fully.
Before you buy
The published wireless range of CHIRP+ 2 is 20% longer. That can matter if the fishing spot lies beyond the PRO+ 2 limit, though it cannot guarantee a clear link through waves or interference.
Where this comes from
The gap is 120 m minus 100 m, or 20 m. Divide it by 100 m and you get 20%. Converting to feet uses 3.28084 ft per meter.
The catch
CHIRP+ 2 publishes 120 m of Wi-Fi range, while this one lists 100 m.
The catch
Simpler castable sonar spares you the setup choices that come with the three-beam CHIRP system, and this one still depends on a phone outdoors.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
Deeper PRO+ 2 and Deeper CHIRP+ 2 weighed up on display and mounting, sonar and depth, charts and bundle.
The differences worth weighing are wireless reach, charging time and GPS use. Published depth and target-separation limits are tied.
Which one fits
Internal GPS on both makes shore-cast bathymetric mapping possible.
The published connection limit for CHIRP+ 2 is 120 m. Waves, phone position and interference can cut the usable range of either model.
With GPS off, CHIRP+ 2 publishes up to 15 hours. PRO+ 2 lists up to nine hours, depending on usage.
A full charge takes a stated 75 minutes on PRO+ 2 and 110 minutes on CHIRP+ 2.
Each publishes a 100 m depth ceiling and 1 cm separation on the narrow beam. Those figures do not show better image quality for either one.
Neither has a built-in display, since both send sonar to your phone or tablet.
In practice
The published wireless range of CHIRP+ 2 is 20% longer. That can matter if the fishing spot lies beyond the PRO+ 2 limit, though it cannot guarantee a clear link through waves or interference.
The gap is 120 m minus 100 m, or 20 m. Divide it by 100 m and you get 20%. Converting to feet uses 3.28084 ft per meter.
The stated 15 hours for CHIRP+ 2 applies with GPS off, and its GPS-on claim is nine hours. PRO+ 2 also lists up to nine hours, under broader usage conditions, so the records do not establish a mapping-runtime winner.
Each manufacturer runtime claim stays tied to its operating mode in the comparison. Nothing about endurance testing is inferred from those claims.
Published charge times are 75 minutes and 110 minutes. With a short charging window between two trips, PRO+ 2 is the easier fit.
110 minus 75 equals 35 minutes. These are manufacturer full-charge figures under their stated conditions. BillionFables did not measure them.
A 100 m depth ceiling, 1 cm narrow-beam separation and 2.4 cm separation on the other beams are listed for both. If you pay for CHIRP+ 2 only to improve those published limits, you would not get a higher rating.
For each of these three limits, the current exact-model specification tables give the same values.

Deeper, PRO+ 2
In the named Amazon configuration a transducer is included, and the maker conditions give a listed sonar depth class of 328 feet.

Deeper, CHIRP+ 2
The named Amazon configuration comes with a transducer, and its listed sonar depth class reaches 328 feet under the maker conditions.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Deeper PRO+ 2 | Deeper CHIRP+ 2 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published wireless range | Up to 100 m | Up to 120 m | When conditions allow, CHIRP+ 2 offers a longer stated connection range. |
| Sonar design | Three fixed frequencies | Three CHIRP beams | Scanning methods differ, yet the shared separation figures do not put a number on any image-quality improvement. |
| Depth range | 15 cm to 100 m | 15 cm to 100 m | These models cannot be told apart by maximum rated water depth. |
| Target separation | 1 cm narrow, 2.4 cm medium or wide | 1 cm narrow, 2.4 cm medium or wide | On either sonar, pick the beam that suits the job. |
| Runtime conditions | Up to 9 hours depending on usage | Up to 9 hours GPS on, 15 hours GPS off | To get the longer CHIRP headline, you give up GPS recording for that session. |
| Full-charge time | 75 minutes | 110 minutes | The stated turnaround between trips is shorter on PRO+ 2. |
Trade-offs
Decision guide
Go with CHIRP+ 2 if you need more wireless range or want longer sessions with GPS turned off. PRO+ 2 still covers GPS shore mapping, matches its published depth and target-separation limits, and reaches a full charge sooner.
Under suitable conditions, CHIRP+ 2 publishes 120 m of Wi-Fi range to the 100 m of PRO+ 2, which is a 20% increase.
Both units publish a 100 m depth ceiling and 1 cm narrow-beam target separation, and neither limit establishes an advantage for CHIRP+ 2.
CHIRP+ 2 gets to its 15-hour claim only with GPS off, so do not treat it as 15 hours of GPS shore mapping.
By the numbers
What we found across the fish finders we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
11 of the 23 models checked meet every need here: “You fish from a kayak” and “It will move between small boats”.
11 models fit, out of 23 checkedHow we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “You fish from a kayak” and “It will move between small boats”. A need with no documented match is not counted.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deeper PRO+ 2 |
|
| |
| Deeper CHIRP+ 2 |
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

A published Wi-Fi range of 100 m is enough for where you fish
See price & reviews on Amazon
More published wireless reach is a must for you
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money