The catch
Sony WH-CH730N
It weighs 15 g more than the CH720N.
Side by side
Go with WH-CH730N for folding storage and fewer charging stops, and with WH-CH720N when the lightest frame is the priority. Multipoint and a passive analog cable are on both models, so they give you no reason to pay for the newer one.
Before you buy
CH730N’s ANC playback claim is 42.9% higher than CH720N’s.
Where this comes from
42.9% = (50 − 35) ÷ 35 × 100. Both figures come from Sony’s ANC-on music-playback specification.
The catch
It weighs 15 g more than the CH720N.
The catch
The hinge cannot fold inward to suit a small travel case.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
Folding and a longer battery claim set the Sony WH-CH730N apart. Weigh them against its extra 15 g, the cable fallback and source requirements versus the WH-CH720N.
Which one fits
That adds up to 30 hours of listening. CH730N has 20 rated hours to spare on that schedule, against five on CH720N. Real runtime can be lower.
CH720N weighs 15 g less. Clamp and pad shape still matter, so try both.
Each time the headphones go into a crowded bag, the new folding hinge is relevant.
Both have multipoint, so it gives the newer model no advantage.
In practice
CH730N’s ANC playback claim is 42.9% higher than CH720N’s.
42.9% = (50 − 35) ÷ 35 × 100. Both figures come from Sony’s ANC-on music-playback specification.
On a schedule of six hours per weekday, CH730N keeps 20 hours of margin under the published claims and CH720N keeps five.
5 × 6 = 30 hours, then 50 − 30 = 20 and 35 − 30 = 5. The margins are arithmetic on rated limits and do not guarantee remaining battery.
Compared with CH720N, CH730N weighs 7.8% more.
7.8% = (207 − 192) ÷ 192 × 100.
Plug in your setup
Start with how you listen. Charging over USB is not the same as playing audio over USB, and some headphones need power even on a cable. These answers are placeholders until you apply your own.
Plays over Bluetooth.
Plays over Bluetooth.
Battery figures are maker claims for the stated mode. They do not reflect measured travel time. Volume, codec, calls and battery age all change runtime. Closed earcups can still leak some sound. Weight alone does not predict comfort. USB audio needs a compatible source and cable. This check does not judge sound quality, mic quality or amplifier power.

Sony, WH-CH730N
What you gain over the CH720N is simple: a frame that folds, plus a 50-hour ANC claim. The cost is 15 g of extra weight, so the older model remains the better pick when low weight is the priority.

Sony, WH-CH720N
A sensible place to start if you want noise cancellation without a heavy headset. At 192 g it is lighter than the CH730N, but it cannot fold inward to pack down.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Sony WH-CH730N | Sony WH-CH720N | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 207 g | 192 g | The longer battery claim costs 15 g in extra weight. |
| ANC playback claim | Up to 50 hours | Up to 35 hours | With noise cancellation enabled, the difference is 15 rated hours. |
| ANC-off playback claim | Up to 75 hours | Up to 50 hours | Do not use either ANC-off number to estimate a flight with noise canceling. |
| Packing | Folds inward | Does not fold inward | CH730N adds a useful change for travel that goes beyond a bump in specifications. |
| Passive analog | Supported | Supported | With depleted batteries, both still work from an analog source. |
| Two-device multipoint | Supported | Supported | Either one can cover a phone and laptop. |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC, AAC, LC3 | SBC, AAC | A compatible LE Audio source is needed for LC3. LDAC appears on neither list. |
Trade-offs
Decision guide
Pick WH-CH730N if you want storage that folds and fewer charging stops. Pick WH-CH720N if the lightest frame matters more to you. Because both have multipoint and a passive analog cable, neither feature justifies paying extra for the newer model.
The longer battery claim is the easy part to grasp, yet if you carry the headphones in a small bag, the folding frame may count for more. CH720N turns flat and does not fold inward, while CH730N gives you a clear packing option the old design lacks.
CH730N earns its prominent 75-hour figure only with noise cancellation off. If a noisy journey is why you are buying, compare 50 against 35 hours. Both remain maximum claims, and real results vary with volume, calls and settings.
LC3 gives you one more option and is not a sound upgrade for everyone, since you need a compatible LE Audio source. Many buyers will care more about the ordinary passive analog fallback and multipoint, which both models keep, than about the codec list.
By the numbers
What we found across the headphones we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Only 3 of the 60 models checked meet every need here: “I go back and forth between laptop and phone”, “I want music even with a dead battery”, “I want a pair that weighs 250 g or less”, and “My bag has no space left”.
3 models fit, out of 60 checkedHow we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “I go back and forth between laptop and phone”, “I want music even with a dead battery”, “I want a pair that weighs 250 g or less”, and “My bag has no space left”. A need with no documented match is not counted.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sony WH-CH730N |
|
|
|
| Sony WH-CH720N |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Your bag is crowded and you want a frame that folds.
See price & reviews on Amazon
You like the lighter 192 g frame better.
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money