The catch
Brother DCP-L2640DW
Closed body is wider.
Side by side
Recurring supported scan packets of 36-to-50-sheet size, or a documented 5 GHz wireless connection, point to the Brother DCP-L2640DW. The Canon MF284dw is the better fit when its narrower body solves a placement problem, or when its complete price is better and your packets fit 35 sheets. On either one, check lid and service clearance. Scanning the reverse side of originals takes manual handling on both.
Before you buy
A stack of 40 supported sheets takes one initial load on the Brother and two on the Canon. At 30 sheets, both need one. Choose by the stack sizes that show up on your desk. A 50-sheet feeder is not faster in every case.
Where this comes from
Feeder limits as stated cover supported originals only. The example counts loading interruptions and does not estimate scan speed.
The catch
Closed body is wider.
The catch
A smaller feeder, and a taller closed body.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
Before you pick a monochrome all-in-one, look at feeder loads, closed dimensions and the network options.
Neither exact model has fax, and both are networked monochrome print/copy/scan machines. A plausible cross-brand choice gets settled by document size, placement and the network connection available.
Which one fits
One feeder load holds the packet on Brother, but Canon needs it split.
The Canon body measures 15.4 inches wide and the Brother 16.1. Additional clearance is still needed.
5 GHz is expressly supported by Brother. For Canon, use Ethernet or verify another connection.
Each feeder reads only one side at a time. Automatic duplex printing does not meet this requirement, whether or not the packet fits a feeder load.
In practice
A stack of 40 supported sheets takes one initial load on the Brother and two on the Canon. At 30 sheets, both need one. Choose by the stack sizes that show up on your desk. A 50-sheet feeder is not faster in every case.
Feeder limits as stated cover supported originals only. The example counts loading interruptions and does not estimate scan speed.
Canon is 0.7 inch narrower but 3 inches taller, at the same listed depth. A shelf can favor either, depending on which dimension is fixed. Lid and maintenance space are extra and sit outside this closed-body comparison.
The measurements are for the closed body. Extra room is needed for the lid, trays, cable connections and maintenance access.
If the printer has to join a 5 GHz wireless network, Brother is the documented choice. With Ethernet available beside the printer, both have a wired route, and the wireless difference no longer decides the purchase.
5 GHz support is expressly listed for Brother. The Canon record does not establish it, so either verify a supported wireless connection or use the documented Ethernet port.

Brother, DCP-L2640DW
Closed body lower but wider, with a 50-sheet single-sided feeder and documented dual-band Wi-Fi.

Canon, MF284dw
The closed body is narrower and has a 35-sheet single-sided feeder. Leave room for the taller body, the open lid and service access.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Brother DCP-L2640DW | Canon MF284dw | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feeder capacity | 50 sheets, simplex | 35 sheets, simplex | Start by counting sheets in the original stack. A 40-sheet two-sided packet still means 40 sheets to load, with separate handling needed for each side. |
| Closed body | 16.1 W x 15.7 D x 12.5 H inches | 15.4 W x 15.7 D x 15.5 H inches | The Brother stands 3 inches lower and the Canon is 0.7 inch narrower. Lid-opening clearance is not part of either closed measurement. |
| Network options | Ethernet and 2.4/5 GHz Wi-Fi | Ethernet and 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi | 5 GHz support is documented for Brother. If a cable is practical, Ethernet may remove that difference. |
| Main paper cassette | 250 sheets | 250 sheets | Do not inflate the extra one-sheet feed on the Brother into a bulk-print capacity advantage. |
Trade-offs
Change of plan
Go with Canon MF284dw. For packets of 35 supported sheets or fewer, the larger Brother feeder saves no load. To settle this otherwise close choice, Canon needs a genuine narrower-body fit advantage or a better current complete offer.
Go with Brother DCP-L2640DW. Those packets do not have to be split on Brother.
Neither model fits. Each documented feeder is simplex only.
Decision guide
Choose the Brother DCP-L2640DW if your supported scan packets recur at 36-to-50-sheet size or you rely on a documented 5 GHz wireless connection. The Canon MF284dw wins when its narrower body fixes a placement constraint, or its complete price is better and the packets fit 35 sheets. Either way, check lid and service clearance. Manual handling is needed on both to scan the reverse side of originals.
By the numbers
What we found across the laser printers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brother DCP-L2640DW |
|
| |
| Canon MF284dw |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Your usual supported scan packets run 36 to 50 sheets, and the Brother body fits the space you have.
Space is enough for the Brother body, and its documented 5 GHz Wi-Fi or lower closed height solves a real installation constraint.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Your supported packets stay within 35 sheets, there is enough lid and service clearance for the Canon, and the Canon has the better current complete offer.
A width limit rules out the 16.1-inch Brother but admits the 15.4-inch Canon body, which also has enough height and operating clearance.
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money