The catch
Canon MF275dw
Only one side at a time gets read by the 35-sheet feeder.
Side by side
Canon MF275dw vs MF287dw: Neither duplex-scans, but 287 holds more print paper
Quick verdict
Longer monochrome jobs and a 250-sheet paper tray favor the MF287dw. On a lighter workload the MF275dw still handles fax, network printing and short one-sided scan stacks. Neither scans both sides automatically.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
Upgrading the printing side leaves scan-stack capacity unimproved
35-sheet simplex feeders are on each. A 40-sheet stack still cannot go in one load on the MF287dw, and it adds no automatic reverse-side capture.
Where this comes from
A 35-sheet, one-sided document feeder is documented for each model. Either capacity is exceeded by five sheets in a 40-sheet packet.
The catch
Canon MF287dw
The feeder takes only 35 sheets, and it cannot scan two sides automatically.
Canon MF275dw
- Why pick it
- You run short print jobs
- You get by with a 150-sheet input
- The catch
- Only one side at a time gets read by the 35-sheet feeder.
Canon MF287dw
- Why pick it
- Your packets run past 150 sheets
- Faster rated monochrome output matters to you
- The catch
- The feeder takes only 35 sheets, and it cannot scan two sides automatically.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
What this page compares
Paper capacity and printing speed differ, but the 35-sheet simplex feeder is the same on both. Find out which jobs justify the MF287dw.
Longer monochrome jobs and a 250-sheet paper tray favor the MF287dw. On a lighter workload the MF275dw still handles fax, network printing and short one-sided scan stacks. Neither scans both sides automatically.
Which one fits
Pick the situations that sound like you
Scanning thirty one-sided forms
The supported stack fits either feeder.
- Canon MF275dw
- Good
- Canon MF287dw
- Good
Without refilling, two hundred simplex printouts
Enough fits in the MF287 main tray alone.
- Canon MF275dw
- Caution
- Canon MF287dw
- Better fit
One feeder load of forty originals
35 sheets is the limit for each feeder.
- Canon MF275dw
- Not suitable
- Canon MF287dw
- Not suitable
Two-sided forms scanned automatically
Each feeder is simplex only.
- Canon MF275dw
- Not suitable
- Canon MF287dw
- Not suitable
In practice
Differences you will notice
Upgrading the printing side leaves scan-stack capacity unimproved
35-sheet simplex feeders are on each. A 40-sheet stack still cannot go in one load on the MF287dw, and it adds no automatic reverse-side capture.
How we worked this out
A 35-sheet, one-sided document feeder is documented for each model. Either capacity is exceeded by five sheets in a 40-sheet packet.
The tray difference shows up on a 200-sheet job
Its 250-sheet main cassette lets the MF287dw hold 200 sheets of suitable paper. For that one-sided job, the 150-sheet input of the MF275dw needs a reload.
How we worked this out
The job assumed is 200 physical sheets. Canon documents a 250-sheet input for the MF287dw and a 150-sheet input for the MF275dw. The first holds the batch, and the second needs 50 more sheets loaded.
The speed headline promises more than short jobs deliver
A 100-page one-sided job differs by about 29 seconds of steady printing at the rated 30 and 35 pages per minute. Startup and processing time are not counted. For short jobs, the larger tray may be a more useful upgrade than the extra speed.
How we worked this out
A steady-output calculation for illustration: 100 ÷ 30 × 60 = 200 seconds, and 100 ÷ 35 × 60 = 171.4 seconds. The difference is 28.6 seconds, rounded to 29. It is not a measured completion time.
Option A
Canon, MF275dw
MF275dw
Fax plus an automatic feeder for short stacks, in a small office.
- Best for
- You run short print jobs
Facts we checked
- Main paper input: Holds 150 sheets
- Output on Letter: Up to 30 ppm
- Document feeder: Simplex, 35-sheet
- Fax: Yes
Option B
Canon, MF287dw
MF287dw
Office forms in short single-sided stacks, with fax and network printing.
- Best for
- Your packets run past 150 sheets
Facts we checked
- Main paper input: Holds 250 sheets
- Output on Letter: Up to 35 ppm
- Document feeder: Simplex, 35-sheet
- Fax: Yes
Spec by spec
Where they really differ
| Spec | Canon MF275dw | Canon MF287dw | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main paper input | 150 sheets | 250 sheets | Jobs that land between these limits need fewer refills on the MF287. |
| Letter output | Up to 30 ppm | Up to 35 ppm | Longer batches favor the MF287 on rated speed. |
| Document feeder | 35-sheet simplex | 35-sheet simplex | ADF capacity is not increased by the higher model. |
| Fax | Yes | Yes | Fax by itself is no reason to upgrade. |
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With Canon MF275dw
- During a 200-sheet single-sided print run, its 150-sheet paper input has to be refilled.
With Canon MF287dw
- A 500-sheet single-sided job cannot be supplied by the 250-sheet main tray without refilling.
Change of plan
When the answer changes
Print jobs of yours regularly go past 150 sheets
Go with Canon MF287dw. Reloads are reduced by the 250-sheet tray.
Light printing, and short scan stacks
Go with Canon MF275dw. Fax and the same ADF capacity stay with the MF275.
Two-sided scanning has to be automatic for you
Neither model fits. Pick a model that has a duplex ADF.
Decision guide
How to decide
Go with the MF287dw for longer monochrome jobs and the 250-sheet paper tray. A lighter workload of fax, network printing and short one-sided scan stacks is still within the MF275dw. Automatic scanning of both sides is not offered by either.
Pay for paper capacity only if you will use it
That 100-sheet difference pays off for jobs that land between the tray limits. A household printing ten pages a week will rarely need the capacity, whereas a small office with long packets often does.
Do not expect a different scanner
Each feeder holds 35 sheets and reads one face at a time, so the MF287dw is no scanner upgrade for larger or two-sided stacks. The pricier model is not automatically the better pick for every document task.
Fax is present on each machine
Fax comes with each. Check your telephone connection and what your provider requires, though you have no reason to pick the MF287 just for this function.
Speed ratings need context
Thirty versus 35 Letter ppm describes rated continuous output. The time a real job takes also depends on first-page waiting, document processing and duplex settings. No test claim of ours guarantees a five-ppm gap in your office.
What this page can’t tell you
- Print speeds here are manufacturer ratings. We did not measure them in matched hands-on tests.
- Toner yields are derived from standardized test documents and shift with content.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the laser printers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Show the facts and the math
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canon MF275dw |
|
|
|
| Canon MF287dw |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
See today’s price and what owners say
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Canon MF275dw
You run short print jobs
See price & reviews on AmazonCanon MF287dw
Your packets run past 150 sheets
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money