The catch
Panasonic LUMIX S5II body
Tall 6K 3:2 tops out at 30p, 4K60 is cropped, and there is no USB-SSD recording.
Side by side
Ordinary 6K stays simple on the S5II, and the S1II adds tall 60p and direct SSD recording. The S5II is the pick if 6K 3:2 at 30p and supported two-SD recording already meet the output. The S1II is the pick if 5.1K 3:2 at 60p or qualified USB-SSD recording solves a specific editing problem. Both are body-only. Two-card use on the S1II needs mixed card formats, and its SSD mode turns off card recording.
Before you buy
Both bodies give you 5952×3968 3:2 at 30p. For a conversation, a craft demonstration or an ordinary family film, S1II gives that source no more pixels. What it does add is 5088×3392 3:2 at 60p, which can support slower playback and leaves more vertical room than a 16:9 capture would. For movement that has to work in two orientations, that is a meaningful upgrade. Its full-height portrait crop is 1908×3392, though, so native portrait 4K is not preserved. Begin with the finished clip, and pick S1II if the faster source changes it. Do not buy the newer body for 30p work that stays the same.
Where this comes from
From the exact 3:2 format tables and 3392×9/16=1908. No claim that 6K 3:2 reaches 60p or 5.1K60 yields native portrait 4K.
The catch
Tall 6K 3:2 tops out at 30p, 4K60 is cropped, and there is no USB-SSD recording.
The catch
Slots are one Type B CFexpress and one SD. In SSD mode card copies are lost and battery demand goes up.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
Panasonic S5II vs S1II for family films and a home studio that is growing. Weigh two-orientation 60p, editing straight from the drive and the cards behind the upgrade.
A proven full-frame L-mount body set against a more capable current hybrid. Buyers can hold on to their lenses while deciding if faster tall capture and direct SSD recording are worth a different supporting setup.
Which one fits
S1II needs CFexpress Type B in its first slot.
S1II adds 5.1K 3:2 at 60p.
S1II handles the drive workflow, with cards turned off.
Both provide that 3:2 geometry up to 30p.
In practice
Both bodies give you 5952×3968 3:2 at 30p. For a conversation, a craft demonstration or an ordinary family film, S1II gives that source no more pixels. What it does add is 5088×3392 3:2 at 60p, which can support slower playback and leaves more vertical room than a 16:9 capture would. For movement that has to work in two orientations, that is a meaningful upgrade. Its full-height portrait crop is 1908×3392, though, so native portrait 4K is not preserved. Begin with the finished clip, and pick S1II if the faster source changes it. Do not buy the newer body for 30p work that stays the same.
From the exact 3:2 format tables and 3392×9/16=1908. No claim that 6K 3:2 reaches 60p or 5.1K60 yields native portrait 4K.
A compatible USB SSD can take S1II recordings, which is handy if the same drive then goes straight to the editing computer. Card recording is disabled while that mode is active. The drive thus holds the original, so an editor should make a separate verified copy before reusing it. S5II writes its internal formats to cards and needs a later transfer to the working drive. In a supported workflow, S1II can skip that first transfer, but the backup time remains. The drive also calls for proper mounting, cable and power planning when one person operates the camera.
S1II offers USB-SSD support with explicit card and power restrictions, while S5II has no SSD capture. Editing compatibility and the copy workflow are conditional.
If you already run matched SD cards in S5II, you can keep that two-card routine and avoid buying into another format. S1II has one CFexpress Type B slot and one SD slot. Even if you carry on recording an ordinary supported format, filling both slots requires the right first-slot card and a way to read it. Demanding formats may also rule out duplicate recording, since the SD side cannot support them. That is why the whole recording and transfer setup belongs in the upgrade budget. S5II stays a sensible choice when the familiar SD workflow already protects and delivers the work you make.
Drawn from card interfaces, supported backup roles and S1II’s SD-format restrictions. No card prices or included accessories are invented.

Panasonic, DC-S5M2BODY9
What you regularly produce is ordinary-speed horizontal and portrait edits from a single 6K take.

Panasonic, DC-S1M2BODY9
For slower playback in horizontal and portrait edits alike, a tall 60p source matters.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Panasonic LUMIX S5II body | Panasonic LUMIX S1II body | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary-speed tall 6K | 5952×3968 up to 30p | 5952×3968 up to 30p | For this particular source, upgrading adds no pixels. |
| Tall 60p option | Unavailable in 6K 3:2 | 5088×3392 3:2 up to 60p | S1II brings a useful source for slower playback, with less room to crop. |
| Direct USB-SSD capture | Unavailable | Supported with qualified media | With S1II the recording destination changes and the cards are disabled. |
| Two-card setup | Two UHS-II SD | CFexpress Type B plus SD | Both S1II slots cannot be filled with existing SD spares. |
| Body with battery/card | 740g | 800g | The 60g gap between bodies leaves out any recording rig. |
Trade-offs
Change of plan
Go with Panasonic LUMIX S5II body. S5II lets you keep the simpler kit you have.
Go with Panasonic LUMIX S1II body. Those extra routes are offered by S1II.
Decision guide
You want a more capable camera, and you do not want an ordinary family film to become a complicated recording rig.
By the numbers
What we found across the mirrorless cameras we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Panasonic LUMIX S5II body |
|
| |
| Panasonic LUMIX S1II body |
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

What you regularly produce is ordinary-speed horizontal and portrait edits from a single 6K take.
A lighter body and two compatible SD cards suit the routine you have.
See price & reviews on Amazon
For slower playback in horizontal and portrait edits alike, a tall 60p source matters.
Recording straight to a compatible SSD improves the editing handoff enough that you will plan your power and copies around it.
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money