Side by side

QNAP TS-264 vs Synology DS225+ Compared: A two-drive mirror on QNAP still leaves room for SSD and card upgrades

Quick verdict

Two NVMe slots, more installed memory and a supported PCIe network-upgrade route point to the TS-264-8G. If Synology Photos and DSM backups are the priority, pick the DS225+. A two-drive mirror fits in both, but QNAP leaves more hardware options around that mirror without replacing the enclosure.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

Four times the RAM comes in the box with the selected QNAP

TS-264-8G comes with 8 GB, against 2 GB in DS225+. That is 6 GB more installed memory for the operating system and apps to share. The starting-capacity difference is real, though it does not prove four times the performance.

Where this comes from

8 / 2 = 4, and 8 - 2 = 6 GB. Both figures are installed-memory capacities on the selected product variants.

The catch

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

The faster network card is an optional extra that takes up the single PCIe slot.

The catch

Synology DiskStation DS225+

Without NVMe or PCIe slots.

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

Why pick it
  • Keep two SATA drives and add NVMe storage or cache
  • Keep a documented PCIe route open to compatible faster networking
The catch
The faster network card is an optional extra that takes up the single PCIe slot.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Synology DiskStation DS225+

Synology DiskStation DS225+

Why pick it
  • Work with Synology Photos, Drive and DSM backup tools
  • Stay with a plain two-drive NAS and one 2.5GbE connection
The catch
Without NVMe or PCIe slots.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

QNAP TS-264-8G and Synology DS225+ compared on two-drive storage, apps and future networking, including which upgrades leave the hard-drive mirror intact.

Two NVMe slots, more installed memory and a supported PCIe network-upgrade route point to the TS-264-8G. If Synology Photos and DSM backups are the priority, pick the DS225+. A two-drive mirror fits in both, but QNAP leaves more hardware options around that mirror without replacing the enclosure.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • I plan on two HDDs and two NVMe devices

    Separate M.2 positions are on QNAP and not on Synology.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Better fit
    Synology DiskStation DS225+
    Not suitable
  • Later on I might add a compatible 10GbE card

    A PCIe route is documented by QNAP, and card, client and network compatibility still apply.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Depends
    Synology DiskStation DS225+
    Not suitable
  • The DSM photo and backup workflow is my priority

    Synology's software environment runs on DS225+.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Depends
    Synology DiskStation DS225+
    Better fit
  • Today my only switch is 1GbE

    Until it is upgraded, that network segment limits the path.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Similar
    Synology DiskStation DS225+
    Similar

In practice

Differences you will notice

Four times the RAM comes in the box with the selected QNAP

TS-264-8G comes with 8 GB, against 2 GB in DS225+. That is 6 GB more installed memory for the operating system and apps to share. The starting-capacity difference is real, though it does not prove four times the performance.

How we worked this out

8 / 2 = 4, and 8 - 2 = 6 GB. Both figures are installed-memory capacities on the selected product variants.

SSDs can be added while the hard-drive mirror stays intact

Once both SATA bays are filled, DS225+ has no internal SSD slot, but TS-264 still has two NVMe positions. QNAP can therefore take a two-SSD plan without giving up either hard drive, depending on compatible drives and the chosen storage mode.

How we worked this out

Each has 2 SATA bays. QNAP also has 2 independent M.2 positions and Synology has 0. Filling the SATA pair uses none of QNAP's M.2 positions.

One expansion slot is shared by the network-upgrade route

The optional faster network card for QNAP takes up its single PCIe slot. If a PCIe storage card is also on your list, do not assume both separate cards fit together. Work out which expansion is essential before counting every advertised option into one future system.

How we worked this out

There is 1 PCIe Gen 3 x2 slot on TS-264, and two separate PCIe cards need 2 slots. A supported combination card would need a compatibility check of its own.

Option A
QNAP TS-264-8G-US

QNAP, TS-264-8G-US

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

This two-bay NAS has two built-in NVMe slots, dual 2.5GbE and a PCIe slot that takes supported SSD or network expansion. The current 8G configuration selected here comes with 8 GB RAM.

Best for
Keep two SATA drives and add NVMe storage or cache

Facts we checked

  • SATA bays: 2
  • Built-in M.2 slots: Two NVMe 2280, PCIe Gen 3 x1 each
  • Installed RAM: 8 GB on the selected 8G model
  • Official RAM ceiling: 16 GB on the current SODIMM revision
Option B
Synology DiskStation DS225+

Synology, DS225+

Synology DiskStation DS225+

A 2-bay chassis whose fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.

Best for
Work with Synology Photos, Drive and DSM backup tools

Facts we checked

  • SATA bays: 2
  • Built-in M.2 slots: None
  • Installed RAM: 2 GB
  • Official RAM ceiling: 6 GB

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where QNAP TS-264-8G-US and Synology DiskStation DS225+ differ
SpecQNAP TS-264-8G-USSynology DiskStation DS225+In practice
SATA bays22With equal drives, basic mirrored hard-drive capacity comes out the same.
Built-in M.2 slotsTwo NVMe 2280, PCIe Gen 3 x1 eachNoneCompatible SSDs can go into QNAP without taking a SATA bay.
Installed RAM8 GB on the selected 8G model2 GBSupplied memory is 6 GB apart. That does not guarantee how many applications run.
Official RAM ceiling16 GB on the current SODIMM revision6 GBBefore planning a memory upgrade, confirm the QNAP hardware revision.
Built-in EthernetTwo 2.5GbEOne 2.5GbE and one 1GbEA 2.5GbE path is available on both, but the second port differs in capability.
Internal PCIe expansionOne Gen 3 x2 slot, compatible network-card optionsNoneOptional 5GbE and 10GbE cards are documented by QNAP, and both the cards and the matching network cost extra.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With QNAP TS-264-8G-US

  • The hardware revision needs checking when you plan a memory upgrade.

With Synology DiskStation DS225+

  • Memory headroom is smaller with the supplied 2 GB and the official 6 GB ceiling.

Change of plan

When the answer changes

I want SSDs next to a two-hard-drive mirror

Go with QNAP TS-264-8G-US. Two built-in NVMe positions come with TS-264.

For daily management I prefer DSM over QTS

Go with Synology DiskStation DS225+. The Synology software environment comes with DS225+.

I require four internal SATA bays

Neither model fits. Two apiece in the enclosures compared.

Decision guide

How to decide

01

Look at the exact 8G offer

The TS-264-8G-US listing is what this page is based on. From January 2024 onward, QNAP's current specification documents SODIMM memory, and older revisions can differ. The included 8 GB is clear in the selected model. If a later RAM upgrade matters to you, ask the seller to confirm the revision before relying on the current 16 GB ceiling.

02

An upgrade path is not an included feature

10GbE is not included with the TS-264, which instead offers a PCIe path for a compatible card. A faster client adapter, switch and suitable storage may be needed as well. If that route motivates the purchase, price all of it instead of treating a diskless 2.5GbE NAS as a ready-made 10GbE system.

03

Remember the two-drive limit

QNAP gains flexibility from NVMe slots and expansion cards, yet the chassis still has just two SATA bays. A four-bay enclosure may be the better starting point if the long-term plan is a large hard-drive array with several disks. Important data needs a separate backup on both models.

Check these before you buy

  • If upgrading RAM matters, confirm TS-264-8G-US and the memory revision.
  • Verify compatibility of the exact PCIe card and the drives before you order.
  • Budget for a separate backup and for both hard drives.

What this page can’t tell you

  • Storage figures assume compatible drives of equal capacity and decimal TB, counted before formatting, system space and metadata. RAID covers the drive failures it is specified for, but it does not replace a separate backup.
  • Treat network figures as link rates. They are not measured file-transfer speeds. For the exact model you buy, check software support, memory revision, drive compatibility and the rest of the network.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the NAS devices we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
2 models
Sources
2 covering these models
Product data updated
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
QNAP TS-264-8G-US
  • Keep two SATA drives and add NVMe storage or cache
  • Keep a documented PCIe route open to compatible faster networking
  • SATA bays: 2
  • Built-in M.2 slots: Two NVMe 2280, PCIe Gen 3 x1 each
  • Installed RAM: 8 GB on the selected 8G model
  • Official RAM ceiling: 16 GB on the current SODIMM revision
  • Built-in Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE
  • Internal PCIe expansion: One Gen 3 x2 slot, compatible network-card options
Synology DiskStation DS225+
  • Work with Synology Photos, Drive and DSM backup tools
  • Stay with a plain two-drive NAS and one 2.5GbE connection
  • SATA bays: 2
  • Built-in M.2 slots: None
  • Installed RAM: 2 GB
  • Official RAM ceiling: 6 GB
  • Built-in Ethernet: One 2.5GbE and one 1GbE
  • Internal PCIe expansion: None

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money