Side by side

TerraMaster F4-425 vs UGREEN NASync DXP2800 Compared: SSD apps with two hard drives, or a four-disk RAID archive

Quick verdict

Four SATA disks and RAID 5 fit in the F4-425. The DXP2800 has two SATA bays, yet it adds two M.2 slots and 8GB memory for a compact application server.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

Protected capacity when all drives are 12TB

In this example, F4-425 gives 36TB before formatting and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 gives 12TB. The gap is 24TB before filesystem overhead.

Where this comes from

Suppose each SATA bay holds a supported 12TB disk. A two-bay RAID 1 gives the usable capacity of one disk. With three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. The layout is only an illustration. It is not storage that comes included, and it is not a backup.

The catch

TerraMaster F4-425

That single network port is capped at 2.5GbE.

The catch

UGREEN NASync DXP2800

Only two SATA bays means limited growth and no parity layouts.

TerraMaster F4-425

TerraMaster F4-425

Why pick it
  • Protected capacity has to come from four SATA drives
  • supplied ram: you want 4GB
The catch
That single network port is capped at 2.5GbE.
See price & reviews on Amazon
UGREEN NASync DXP2800

UGREEN NASync DXP2800

Why pick it
  • A compact server with two M.2 slots is what you want
  • supplied ram: you want 8GB
The catch
Only two SATA bays means limited growth and no parity layouts.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

Which of F4-425 and DXP2800 fits depends on protected storage, included networking and the exact SSD or application layout you need.

It is hard-drive growth against a smaller server that can take SSDs.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • Protected archive built from 12 TB disks filling every internal SATA bay

    In this example, RAID 1 covers two disks and RAID 5 covers three or more. F4-425 yields 36TB and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 yields 12TB before formatting. The gap is 24TB before filesystem overhead.

    TerraMaster F4-425
    Better fit
    UGREEN NASync DXP2800
    Good
  • A workstation already at the speed of the faster included Ethernet port

    The ports included run at 2.5GbE and 2.5GbE. Read the 100GB calculation together with the real client speed.

    TerraMaster F4-425
    Similar
    UGREEN NASync DXP2800
    Similar
  • Multiple local services dividing up the supplied RAM

    TerraMaster F4-425 has 4 GB RAM and supports 16 GB, and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 has 8 GB and supports 16 GB. Match the stated application memory requirement to the supplied configuration first, then decide on any upgrade budget. RAM capacity alone cannot establish application speed.

    TerraMaster F4-425
    Depends
    UGREEN NASync DXP2800
    Better fit
  • An SSD requirement can eat up TerraMaster's capacity advantage

    Give two SATA bays in the F4-425 to SSDs and only two are left for HDDs. The DXP2800 can put SSDs in its two M.2 slots instead and keep both SATA bays, depending on the supported pool layout.

    TerraMaster F4-425
    Depends
    UGREEN NASync DXP2800
    Depends

In practice

Differences you will notice

Protected capacity when all drives are 12TB

In this example, F4-425 gives 36TB before formatting and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 gives 12TB. The gap is 24TB before filesystem overhead.

How we worked this out

Suppose each SATA bay holds a supported 12TB disk. A two-bay RAID 1 gives the usable capacity of one disk. With three or more drives, RAID 5 usable TB = (drive count minus 1) × 12. The layout is only an illustration. It is not storage that comes included, and it is not a backup.

100GB moved at the speed ceiling of the included port

At line rate, the minimum is 320 seconds for F4-425 and 320 seconds for UGREEN NASync DXP2800. Real copies take longer. With a 1GbE client the lower bound becomes 800 seconds for both.

How we worked this out

Decimal 100GB × 8 = 800 gigabits. Take the fastest included port rate, 2.5Gbps or 2.5Gbps, and divide 800 by it. Protocol overhead is ignored here only because this is a lower-bound calculation. Optional adapters and aggregated ports are left out.

An SSD requirement can eat up TerraMaster's capacity advantage

Give two SATA bays in the F4-425 to SSDs and only two are left for HDDs. The DXP2800 can put SSDs in its two M.2 slots instead and keep both SATA bays, depending on the supported pool layout.

How we worked this out

F4-425 offers 4 SATA and 0 M.2 positions, so reserving 2 SATA for SSDs leaves 2 for HDDs. DXP2800 offers 2 SATA plus 2 M.2. The calculation is about where devices go. It is not a performance estimate.

Option A
TerraMaster F4-425

TerraMaster, F4-425

F4-425

Compared with a two-bay mirror, four SATA bays leave a growing archive more RAID layouts to choose from. Having a single 2.5GbE port and 4GB memory keeps the specs aimed at file storage.

Best for
A family archive that is growing, on four drives

Facts we checked

  • 0 M.2 slots alongside 4 SATA drive bays
  • Fastest network port included: 2.5GbE
  • Comes with 4GB of RAM, expandable to 16GB
  • Intel N5095 processor in a diskless NAS
Option B
UGREEN NASync DXP2800

UGREEN, DXP2800

UGREEN NASync DXP2800

This is a 2-bay chassis, and 2.5 Gbps is the fastest network path documented for it.

Best for
host Plex at home with 4K transcoding

Facts we checked

  • Storage comes in a 2-bay chassis.
  • The fastest network path documented for it runs at 2.5 Gbps.
  • It supports serving media through Plex.

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where TerraMaster F4-425 and UGREEN NASync DXP2800 differ
SpecTerraMaster F4-425UGREEN NASync DXP2800In practice
SATA drive bays42It alters which disk layouts the main enclosure can hold.
Supplied RAM4GB8GBThis figure is the memory already installed, before any upgrade modules are bought.
M.2 storage slots02Treat SSD cache and storage pools as a separate plan from the SATA archive.
ProcessorIntel N5095Intel N100The platform determines the media engines, the application architecture and the concurrency.
Software and expansion routeTOSUGOS ProPick the applications and supported add-ons the job calls for.
SATA bays with supported expansion42Compatible hardware bought separately, plus a supported pool layout, is what expansion takes.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With TerraMaster F4-425

  • The listing shows no M.2 storage slots, and because the enclosure is diskless you need to budget for drives separately.

With UGREEN NASync DXP2800

  • With one network port, there is no second wired path.

Change of plan

When the answer changes

Protected capacity has to come from four SATA drives

Go with TerraMaster F4-425. Four SATA bays are on F4-425. Fill them with four equal 12 TB disks and RAID 5 gives 36 TB before formatting, against 12 TB from the DXP2800's SATA mirror.

A compact server with two M.2 slots is what you want

Go with UGREEN NASync DXP2800. Beside its two SATA bays, DXP2800 has two M.2 positions. A supported SSD mirror can therefore go there and leave both SATA positions free for hard drives.

Decision guide

How to decide

01

First, pin down the storage layout you need

Four SATA disks and RAID 5 fit in the F4-425. The DXP2800 has two SATA bays, yet it adds two M.2 slots and 8GB memory for a compact application server.

02

Count what the drive budget allows

Four 12TB disks in the four-bay TerraMaster make a 36TB RAID 5 example, against 12TB from the UGREEN two-drive mirror. A bigger advertised raw maximum is no substitute for this protection calculation.

03

Look at the client and apps you will really use

A 2.5GbE link is used by both. For a nightly backup from a gigabit desktop, neither has a link-rate advantage. Decide on drive count, applications and the desk space you have.

Check these before you buy

  • Match the diskless model you picked and its supplied RAM to the exact listing.
  • Every drive and memory module should appear on the manufacturer compatibility list.
  • Add up the cost of a separate backup and any client adapter or switch you need.

What this page can’t tell you

  • Capacity examples assume equal 12TB drives, counted before formatting, snapshots and filesystem overhead.
  • Treat Ethernet calculations as lower bounds, since disk performance, network protocol and other traffic add time.
  • Neither application speed nor a VM count follows from memory capacity alone.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the NAS devices we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

How many fit

Only 8 of the 32 models checked meet every need here: “Four drives to start” and “Keep going after one drive fails”.

8 models fit, out of 32 checked
Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
32 models
Sources
4 covering these models
Product data updated

How we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “Four drives to start” and “Keep going after one drive fails”. A need with no documented match is not counted.

The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
TerraMaster F4-425
  • Four drives to start
  • Keep going after one drive fails
  • 0 M.2 slots alongside 4 SATA drive bays
  • Fastest network port included: 2.5GbE
  • Comes with 4GB of RAM, expandable to 16GB
UGREEN NASync DXP2800
  • Keep going after one drive fails
  • Storage comes in a 2-bay chassis.
  • The fastest network path documented for it runs at 2.5 Gbps.
  • It supports serving media through Plex.

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money