The catch
Traeger Woodridge Pro Pellet Grill
It has no direct-flame searing system.
Side by side
Woodridge Pro is the one for more rack area and a larger pellet hopper. Searwood 600 is the one when direct-flame cooking and a 600 F ceiling count for more than maximum smoking space.
Before you buy
The main rack is roughly thirty-nine percent larger, and for a single broad cut that counts for more than total area by itself.
Where this comes from
(585 - 420) / 420 = 39%, rounded. Total area counts the upper racks too, so it is not a single continuous surface.
The catch
It has no direct-flame searing system.
The catch
Its primary grate has 165 fewer square inches.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
Rack area, hopper capacity, direct-flame cooking and phone monitoring for everyday barbecue, compared for Woodridge Pro and Searwood 600.
extra smoking room or finishing over direct flame
Which one fits
Woodridge has a 585-square-inch primary rack and Weber's is 420. Measure your actual cuts and leave gaps for airflow.
For this method, Searwood's DirectFlame system is the documented fit.
Twenty-four pounds gives four more pounds of capacity, but neither hopper promises a particular refill interval.
Both come with connected cooking systems, so decide on area and finishing method.
In practice
The main rack is roughly thirty-nine percent larger, and for a single broad cut that counts for more than total area by itself.
(585 - 420) / 420 = 39%, rounded. Total area counts the upper racks too, so it is not a single continuous surface.
Compared with Weber's twenty-pound hopper, the twenty-four-pound hopper holds twenty percent more pellets.
(24 - 20) / 20 = 20%. Burn rate varies with temperature, weather and how the grill is run, so you cannot work out time from hopper mass by itself.
A searing workflow is covered by DirectFlame and the six-hundred-degree ceiling, and more smoking rack area cannot stand in for them.
The Woodridge Pro listing gives indirect cooking and a 500 F ceiling, and Searwood's gives DirectFlame and a 600 F ceiling.

Traeger, TFB97JLH
Cooking area totals 970 square inches, and the pellet hopper holds 24 pounds.

Weber, 1500120
You get 648 square inches of cooking area and a pellet hopper that holds 20 pounds.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Traeger Woodridge Pro Pellet Grill | Weber Searwood 600 Pellet Grill | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total cooking area | 970 sq in | 648 sq in | Across all racks, Woodridge has 322 more square inches. |
| Main rack area | 585 sq in | 420 sq in | The Woodridge's primary level is larger too, along with the upper rack. |
| Pellet hopper | 24 lb | 20 lb | Woodridge holds four extra pounds, with no runtime guarantee. |
| Maximum set temperature | 500 F | 600 F | Weber's stated range reaches a hundred degrees further. |
| Direct-flame cooking | Indirect pellet cooking | DirectFlame system | Weber brings a different way to finish as well as a higher setpoint. |
| Phone connection | WiFIRE | Wi-Fi and Bluetooth | Connected cooking is supported on both, so needing a phone does not decide it. |
Trade-offs
Change of plan
Go with Weber Searwood 600 Pellet Grill. Searwood offers that cooking method along with a higher set temperature.
Go with Traeger Woodridge Pro Pellet Grill. The 585-square-inch main rack has more room than the 420-square-inch main grate on Searwood.
Decision guide
Go with Woodridge Pro if you want more rack area and a larger pellet hopper. Go with Searwood 600 if direct-flame cooking and a 600 F ceiling outweigh maximum smoking space.
A big total may be spread over several levels. Woodridge leads in both total and main-rack area here, so its advantage counts for a broad main-level load. Vertical clearance and food shape still matter.
Long, larger smoking sessions fit Woodridge's space and pellet reserve. Weber's DirectFlame design is aimed at a different task. When direct exposure is the finish you want, a larger smoker does not automatically stand in for it.
Connected information stays available on both. That connectivity does not remove the need for pellet checks, grease management or supervision, and hopper size alone cannot promise eight or twelve unattended hours.
By the numbers
What we found across the pellet grills and smokers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Only 2 of the 22 models checked meet every need here: “Cook for a family of four”, “Give burgers a direct-flame finish”, and “Watch the cook on my phone”.
2 models fit, out of 22 checkedTraeger Woodridge Pro Pellet Grill lists 970 sq in for listed cooking area, 50% more than the 648 sq in on Weber Searwood 600 Pellet Grill.
How we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “Cook for a family of four”, “Give burgers a direct-flame finish”, and “Watch the cook on my phone”. A need with no documented match is not counted.
How we calculatedFigures are the maker's total cooking area. Upper racks and odd-shaped layouts do not give you the same direct-grate space. For context, 17 of 22 models publish comparable figures.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traeger Woodridge Pro Pellet Grill |
|
|
|
| Weber Searwood 600 Pellet Grill |
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

You smoke on a large main grate plus an upper rack.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Direct-flame access for finishing is what you want.
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money