Side by side

HOOKII Neomow X2 SE vs MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000: X2 SE covers more area, while MOVA fits narrow gates and 3.5-inch grass

Quick verdict

MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 fits a divided half-acre lawn with a narrow gate or a 3.5-inch cutting target. X2 SE fits a larger lawn up to three-quarter acre with wider routes and a cut below about 3.35 inches. Neither needs an RTK antenna.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

A thirty-inch opening falls just short for X2 SE

At 76.2 cm, thirty inches is under X2 SE’s 77 cm minimum. MOVA asks for 60 cm, which leaves 16.2 cm of nominal width margin. It guarantees nothing about turning clearance, but it does change which mower is a plausible candidate.

Where this comes from

HOOKII Neomow X2 SE: Minimum passage 77 cm. MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000: Minimum passage 60 cm. 30 × 2.54 = 76.2 cm.

The catch

HOOKII Neomow X2 SE

The extra area capacity can go to waste because of its passage requirement and lower cutting ceiling.

The catch

MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000

Bigger lawns are out because of the half-acre limit, even if height and routes work.

HOOKII Neomow X2 SE

HOOKII Neomow X2 SE

Why pick it
  • Your grass area is over half acre but under 0.75 acre
  • Your routes clear 77 cm
The catch
The extra area capacity can go to waste because of its passage requirement and lower cutting ceiling.
See price & reviews on Amazon
MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000

MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000

Why pick it
  • A connector falls under 77 cm yet meets MOVA’s 60 cm specification
  • Your grass is kept at 3.5 inches
The catch
Bigger lawns are out because of the half-acre limit, even if height and routes work.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

Neomow X2 SE vs MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000. Choose between extra lawn capacity and a narrower passage requirement, and note the useful difference in taller cuts.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • A straight 70 cm connector on a half-acre lawn

    The width threshold is cleared by MOVA alone. Turns and setbacks need checking.

    HOOKII Neomow X2 SE
    Not suitable
    MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000
    Better fit
  • Wide routes and a two-inch cut on a 0.6-acre lawn

    The area allowance is met only by X2 SE.

    HOOKII Neomow X2 SE
    Better fit
    MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000
    Not suitable
  • Less than half an acre with a 3.5-inch cut

    MOVA alone gets to that height.

    HOOKII Neomow X2 SE
    Not suitable
    MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000
    Better fit
  • A 3.5-inch cut on a 0.6-acre lawn

    Both are out under the two requirements.

    HOOKII Neomow X2 SE
    Not suitable
    MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000
    Not suitable

In practice

Differences you will notice

A thirty-inch opening falls just short for X2 SE

At 76.2 cm, thirty inches is under X2 SE’s 77 cm minimum. MOVA asks for 60 cm, which leaves 16.2 cm of nominal width margin. It guarantees nothing about turning clearance, but it does change which mower is a plausible candidate.

How we worked this out

HOOKII Neomow X2 SE: Minimum passage 77 cm. MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000: Minimum passage 60 cm. 30 × 2.54 = 76.2 cm.

More acreage and taller grass can send you in opposite directions

Neither model fits a 0.6-acre lawn kept at 3.5 inches. X2 SE covers the area but cuts too low, while MOVA gets to the height and goes over its half-acre rating. Take a closer look at a larger high-cut model.

How we worked this out

HOOKII Neomow X2 SE: 0.75-acre rating and 85 mm maximum. MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000: 0.5-acre rating and 3.9-inch maximum. 3.5 inches equals 88.9 mm.

On a divided property, the smaller tier can get to more of it

Take a half-acre lawn split by a 70 cm connector. MOVA meets the stated passage width and X2 SE does not. A rating that is a quarter-acre bigger does not help when the mower cannot use the only route between the two sections.

How we worked this out

HOOKII Neomow X2 SE: 77 cm passage requirement and 0.75-acre rating. MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000: 60 cm passage requirement and 0.5-acre rating.

Plug in your numbers

Can either mower handle your yard?

This checks hard limits only. Personal preferences are left out of the math.

HOOKII Neomow X2 SE

Works with your numbers

Its rating covers 0.75 acre and 45% grades inside the boundary, with no wire to lay. You entered 0.25 acre and a 20% grade.

MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000

Works with your numbers

Its rating covers 0.5 acre and 45% grades inside the boundary, with no wire to lay. You entered 0.25 acre and a 20% grade.

The area check uses the published maximum with no reserve added. When a systematic mowing rating is shown, the mower has to follow that pattern to reach the maximum area. Slopes at the boundary can have a lower limit than the interior. You still need to check trees, gates and separate zones.

Option A
HOOKII Neomow X2 SE

HOOKII, X2 SE

Neomow X2 SE

This three-quarter-acre LiDAR mower states a longer mowing cycle than the older X SE. The triple-camera automatic-mapping module is optional and bought separately.

Best for
Your grass area is over half acre but under 0.75 acre

Facts we checked

  • Area rating: 0.75 acre
  • Minimum passage: 77 cm
  • Cutting height: 30 to 85 mm
  • Interior slope rating: 45 percent
Option B
MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000

MOVA, LiDAX Ultra 2000

LiDAX Ultra 2000

This half-acre LiDAX navigates by LiDAR with no RTK, cuts up to 3.9 inches and maps zones with unusual flexibility.

Best for
A connector falls under 77 cm yet meets MOVA’s 60 cm specification

Facts we checked

  • Area rating: 0.5 acre
  • Minimum passage: 60 cm
  • Cutting height: 1.2 to 3.9 inches
  • Interior slope rating: 45 percent

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where HOOKII Neomow X2 SE and MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 differ
SpecHOOKII Neomow X2 SEMOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000In practice
Area rating0.75 acre0.5 acreThe smaller area limit is not overcome by an advantage at the passage.
Minimum passage77 cm60 cmMeasure the opening and its latch, plus any turns close by.
Cutting height30 to 85 mm1.2 to 3.9 inchesAt the upper end, a different lawn-care routine fits.
Interior slope rating45 percent45 percentA number both share does not compare wet-grass traction.
PositioningLiDAR and visionLiDAR and visionNo separately placed RTK antenna is required by either.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With HOOKII Neomow X2 SE

  • A four-inch grass routine is out of range, since the maximum cut height is 3.35 inches.

With MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000

  • Even with a high zone limit, you still have to check each connecting route.

Change of plan

When the answer changes

Your grass area is over half acre but under 0.75 acre

Go with HOOKII Neomow X2 SE. Your routes clear 77 cm

A connector falls under 77 cm yet meets MOVA’s 60 cm specification

Go with MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000. Your grass is kept at 3.5 inches

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the robotic lawn mowers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
2 models
Sources
3 covering these models
Product data updated
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
HOOKII Neomow X2 SE
  • Your grass area is over half acre but under 0.75 acre
  • Your routes clear 77 cm
  • You need a cutting height under 85 mm
  • Area rating: 0.75 acre
  • Minimum passage: 77 cm
  • Cutting height: 30 to 85 mm
  • Interior slope rating: 45 percent
  • Positioning: LiDAR and vision
MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000
  • A connector falls under 77 cm yet meets MOVA’s 60 cm specification
  • Your grass is kept at 3.5 inches
  • Your total grass area is within half acre
  • Area rating: 0.5 acre
  • Minimum passage: 60 cm
  • Cutting height: 1.2 to 3.9 inches
  • Interior slope rating: 45 percent
  • Positioning: LiDAR and vision

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money