The catch
Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320
Serious banks are ruled out by the 30 percent slope limit.
Side by side
Their half-acre ratings are the same. On moderate ground, the WR320 is the one to use. Once measured slopes or rough transitions go beyond the two-wheel model's 30 percent limit, the WR342 is worth it.
Before you buy
Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 is the better match for “Satellite view gets interrupted by trees or buildings” and “A restrained daytime sound level is what I want”. Worx Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR342 is the better match for “Long steep slopes run across the lawn” and “The terrain is rough, rutted or otherwise uneven”.
Where this comes from
This lines up the current strong and useful fit ratings for the exact products. It does not roll them into one overall score.
The catch
Serious banks are ruled out by the 30 percent slope limit.
The catch
Installing the specified edging hardware lowers the 84 percent rating.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
These half-acre Vision Cloud mowers come with two-wheel drive or four-wheel drive.
This one comes down to drive and published slope first, then to the limits of your own setup.
Which one fits
Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 lists “Two-wheel drive” for drive, while Worx Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR342 lists “Four-wheel drive”. This describes the hardware or mechanism doing the work. The label alone does not prove faster or better results.
When satellite positioning gets difficult, its vision or LiDAR system can support navigation.
On changing terrain, it gets more traction from driven front wheels or an articulating chassis.
Hose-safe deck cleaning is documented by the manufacturer.
Daytime scheduling near living areas suits its documented sound level or low-speed electric drive.
Many warm-season lawns need a taller setting, and its adjustment range reaches it.
In practice
Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 is the better match for “Satellite view gets interrupted by trees or buildings” and “A restrained daytime sound level is what I want”. Worx Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR342 is the better match for “Long steep slopes run across the lawn” and “The terrain is rough, rutted or otherwise uneven”.
This lines up the current strong and useful fit ratings for the exact products. It does not roll them into one overall score.
Worx Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR342 meets 3 of the 3 needs this comparison is built around. Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 meets 2 and misses “Long steep slopes run across the lawn”.
The count uses the current strong and useful fit ratings for these two products. Each need counts once, with no made-up score added on top.
32 of the 56 robotic lawn mowers checked fit this need. Worx Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR342 makes the cut. Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 does not.
The count filters every model in the current category for a strong or useful fit on this single need.
12 of the 56 robotic lawn mowers checked handle both “Long steep slopes run across the lawn” and “I am unable to place an RTK antenna”. Worx Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR342 makes the cut. Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 does not.
You can reproduce the count by filtering the current category for models with a strong or useful fit on both needs.
Plug in your numbers
This checks hard limits only. Personal preferences are left out of the math.
Its rating covers 0.5 acre and 30% grades inside the boundary, with no wire to lay. You entered 0.25 acre and a 20% grade.
Its rating covers 0.5 acre and 84% grades inside the boundary, with no wire to lay. You entered 0.25 acre and a 20% grade.
The area check uses the published maximum with no reserve added. When a systematic mowing rating is shown, the mower has to follow that pattern to reach the maximum area. Slopes at the boundary can have a lower limit than the interior. You still need to check trees, gates and separate zones.

Worx, WR320.1
The half-acre Vision Cloud combines antenna-free RTK with vision on a two-wheel-drive chassis.

Worx, WR342
This half-acre Landroid has four-wheel drive for steeper grades and rougher transitions.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 | Worx Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR342 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive | Two-wheel drive | Four-wheel drive | It names the hardware or mechanism that does the work. A label by itself does not prove faster or better results. |
| Published slope | 30 percent | Up to 84 percent in the base configuration | If your site, surface or working range lies outside the published limits, this alone can decide your shortlist. |
| Rated area | 0.5 acre | 0.5 acre | Both models show the same result for “Rated area”, so this row won't decide between them. |
Trade-offs
By the numbers
What we found across the robotic lawn mowers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Only 8 of the 56 models checked meet every need here: “About half an acre is what I need to cover”, “Long steep slopes run across the lawn”, and “I am unable to place an RTK antenna”.
8 models fit, out of 56 checkedHow we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “About half an acre is what I need to cover”, “Long steep slopes run across the lawn”, and “I am unable to place an RTK antenna”. A need with no documented match is not counted.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 |
|
|
|
| Worx Landroid Vision Cloud 4WD WR342 |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Grades in your yard stay below 30 percent
See price & reviews on Amazon
Parts of your yard are much steeper
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money