Side by side

IQAir GC MultiGas XE vs Atem X: Different machines suit lingering gases and large-room particles

Quick verdict

If gases and persistent odors are the hard part, get the GC MultiGas XE. If particles, quiet operation and faster large-room cleaning matter, get the Atem X. They do such different jobs that the pollutant should settle it.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

Maximum published airflow: how big the gap is

The published “Maximum published airflow” figure is 71% higher on IQAir Atem X: 471 CFM, against 275 CFM on IQAir GC MultiGas XE.

Where this comes from

Higher published output is useful only if your room, surface or workload calls for the extra headroom. It does not, by itself, prove better results. The percentage comes from the lower published figure.

The catch

IQAir GC MultiGas XE

Given the cabinet size and price, a 275-CFM maximum airflow is modest.

The catch

IQAir Atem X

Without a substantial gas or odor filter, it offers poor value when VOCs are the main problem.

IQAir GC MultiGas XE

IQAir GC MultiGas XE

Why pick it
  • A documented 12-pound gas and chemical filter is something you need.
  • Alongside particles, you're concerned about smoke odor or off-gassing.
The catch
Given the cabinet size and price, a 275-CFM maximum airflow is modest.
See price & reviews on Amazon
IQAir Atem X

IQAir Atem X

Why pick it
  • Getting the maximum particle airflow comes first.
  • A very quiet first speed and richer room sensors are what you want.
The catch
Without a substantial gas or odor filter, it offers poor value when VOCs are the main problem.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

IQAir's gas specialist meets its particle specialist, judged on airflow, carbon, sensors, sound and room fit.

This one comes down to main strength and maximum published airflow first, then to the limits of your own setup.

Day to day

How each one fits your routine

Measuring CO2 does not mean the purifier takes CO2 out of the air

Atem X has a CO2 sensor in addition to particle and climate readings, and that can help you spot a ventilation problem. Its particle filters do not establish any CO2-removal function. The carbon and chemisorption package in the GC MultiGas XE is aimed at certain gases, but it should not be assumed to fix elevated room CO2 either. Pick Atem for the extra monitoring if it's useful, and deal with ventilation separately instead of buying either as a CO2 scrubber.

Where this comes from

Detecting a gas and treating it are separate capabilities. Neither source documents a room-CO2 removal specification, and a generic description of a gas filter does not make up for that.

Atem's wide fan range does not turn its minimum into a large-room rating

Across its speeds, Atem X publishes airflow of 65 to 471 CFM. If you plan to run the quietest setting all the time, size for the low-speed condition and not for the maximum. The 275-CFM maximum of the GC MultiGas XE has no matched quiet-speed particle-delivery value here either. If a minimum cleaning rate is essential, decide on verified output at the setting you intend to use, and keep GC's gas-media role separate from Atem's focus on particles.

Where this comes from

The 65-to-471 figures are raw airflow and not pollutant-specific CADR. Raw airflow and minimum decibels, on their own, cannot establish equivalent clean-air delivery or a guaranteed room size.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • I worry about fumes from paint or new furniture

    IQAir GC MultiGas XE lists “12 lb carbon and chemisorption” for gas media, while IQAir Atem X lists “No substantial gas stage listed”. This shows what the treatment path is designed to catch or reduce, and the upkeep it needs.

    IQAir GC MultiGas XE
    Better fit
    IQAir Atem X
    Depends
  • Smoke odors stay in the house

    IQAir GC MultiGas XE lists “275 CFM” for maximum published airflow, while IQAir Atem X lists “471 CFM”. Extra published output only helps when your room, surface or workload needs the headroom. On its own, it does not prove better results.

    IQAir GC MultiGas XE
    Better fit
    IQAir Atem X
    Depends
  • Cooking odors linger

    Once you have handled the source and ventilated, the documented carbon stage can help with lighter smells that keep coming back.

    IQAir GC MultiGas XE
    Better fit
    IQAir Atem X
    Depends
  • Pollen triggers my allergies

    In a room of the right size, its verified particle airflow and filter path are a good match for airborne pollen.

    IQAir GC MultiGas XE
    Good
    IQAir Atem X
    Better fit
  • Pet dander triggers my allergies

    It is a useful pick for airborne dander given its particle performance and pet-home design.

    IQAir GC MultiGas XE
    Good
    IQAir Atem X
    Better fit
  • Dust keeps settling back down too soon

    Airflow aimed at dust can cut down particles while they are still in the air. Dust that has already settled stays where it is.

    IQAir GC MultiGas XE
    Good
    IQAir Atem X
    Better fit

In practice

Differences you will notice

Maximum published airflow: how big the gap is

The published “Maximum published airflow” figure is 71% higher on IQAir Atem X: 471 CFM, against 275 CFM on IQAir GC MultiGas XE.

How we worked this out

Higher published output is useful only if your room, surface or workload calls for the extra headroom. It does not, by itself, prove better results. The percentage comes from the lower published figure.

Option A
IQAir GC MultiGas XE

IQAir, GC MultiGas XE

GC MultiGas XE

Specialized for gases as well as particles, it carries 12 pounds of adsorption media, stages that can each be serviced on their own and current app automation.

Best for
A documented 12-pound gas and chemical filter is something you need.

Facts we checked

  • Main strength: Gases, odors and particles
  • Maximum published airflow: 275 CFM
  • Gas media: 12 lb carbon and chemisorption
  • Sensors: PM2.5
Option B
IQAir Atem X

IQAir, Atem X

Atem X

This premium purifier is wide and shallow. It offers high particle airflow, eight speeds starting from a very low first speed, and richer room sensors.

Best for
Getting the maximum particle airflow comes first.

Facts we checked

  • Main strength: High-flow particle cleaning
  • Maximum published airflow: 471 CFM
  • Gas media: No substantial gas stage listed
  • Sensors: PM2.5, CO2, temperature and humidity

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where IQAir GC MultiGas XE and IQAir Atem X differ
SpecIQAir GC MultiGas XEIQAir Atem XIn practice
Maximum published airflow275 CFM471 CFMHigher published output is useful only if your room, surface or workload calls for the extra headroom. It does not, by itself, prove better results.
Gas media12 lb carbon and chemisorptionNo substantial gas stage listedIt shows what the treatment path is built to catch or reduce, and what upkeep that requires.
SensorsPM2.5PM2.5, CO2, temperature and humidityIt sets how much it can detect, record or navigate on its own, without you stepping in.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With IQAir GC MultiGas XE

  • Saturation of the gas media is something the particle sensor can't tell you.

With IQAir Atem X

  • A conventional cylinder uses less wall space than its 25.2-inch width.

Decision guide

How to decide

Start by naming the pollutant. Gas capacity can't be replaced by particle airflow, and CADR can't be replaced by pounds of carbon.

01

At maximum, Atem X moves 71 percent more air

Atem X is published at 471 CFM maximum and GC MultiGas XE at 275 CFM. For particles in a large room, that makes Atem X the clearer choice.

02

GC MultiGas brings the missing gas layer

Its four cartridges hold 12 pounds of carbon and chemisorption media, and Atem X lists no equivalent gas bed.

Check these before you buy

  • Work out if it's particles, gases or both
  • Get the closed room measured
  • Leave room for changing filters
  • Find the exact replacement set's price

What this page can’t tell you

  • The particle sensor on neither machine detects every gas
  • Quiet-mode output isn't described by the published maximum airflow

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the air purifiers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
2 models
Sources
2 covering these models
Product data updated
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
IQAir GC MultiGas XE
  • A documented 12-pound gas and chemical filter is something you need.
  • Alongside particles, you're concerned about smoke odor or off-gassing.
  • Your maintenance plan works with filter stages that you replace separately.
  • Main strength: Gases, odors and particles
  • Maximum published airflow: 275 CFM
  • Gas media: 12 lb carbon and chemisorption
  • Sensors: PM2.5
  • GC MultiGas XE pairs carbon and chemisorption media with PM2.5 sensing.
  • GC MultiGas XE publishes airflow of up to 275 CFM.
  • GC MultiGas XE: IQAir (maker specs)
IQAir Atem X
  • Getting the maximum particle airflow comes first.
  • A very quiet first speed and richer room sensors are what you want.
  • Against a wall, a 10-inch-deep profile fits better than a conventional floor cabinet.
  • Main strength: High-flow particle cleaning
  • Maximum published airflow: 471 CFM
  • Gas media: No substantial gas stage listed
  • Sensors: PM2.5, CO2, temperature and humidity
  • Atem X comes with a CO2 sensor and lacks a substantial gas-treatment stage.
  • Atem X publishes airflow of 65 to 471 CFM across eight fan speeds.
  • Atem X: IQAir (maker specs)

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money