The catch
IQAir GC MultiGas XE
Given the cabinet size and price, a 275-CFM maximum airflow is modest.
Side by side
If gases and persistent odors are the hard part, get the GC MultiGas XE. If particles, quiet operation and faster large-room cleaning matter, get the Atem X. They do such different jobs that the pollutant should settle it.
Before you buy
The published “Maximum published airflow” figure is 71% higher on IQAir Atem X: 471 CFM, against 275 CFM on IQAir GC MultiGas XE.
Where this comes from
Higher published output is useful only if your room, surface or workload calls for the extra headroom. It does not, by itself, prove better results. The percentage comes from the lower published figure.
The catch
Given the cabinet size and price, a 275-CFM maximum airflow is modest.
The catch
Without a substantial gas or odor filter, it offers poor value when VOCs are the main problem.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
IQAir's gas specialist meets its particle specialist, judged on airflow, carbon, sensors, sound and room fit.
This one comes down to main strength and maximum published airflow first, then to the limits of your own setup.
Day to day
Atem X has a CO2 sensor in addition to particle and climate readings, and that can help you spot a ventilation problem. Its particle filters do not establish any CO2-removal function. The carbon and chemisorption package in the GC MultiGas XE is aimed at certain gases, but it should not be assumed to fix elevated room CO2 either. Pick Atem for the extra monitoring if it's useful, and deal with ventilation separately instead of buying either as a CO2 scrubber.
Detecting a gas and treating it are separate capabilities. Neither source documents a room-CO2 removal specification, and a generic description of a gas filter does not make up for that.
Across its speeds, Atem X publishes airflow of 65 to 471 CFM. If you plan to run the quietest setting all the time, size for the low-speed condition and not for the maximum. The 275-CFM maximum of the GC MultiGas XE has no matched quiet-speed particle-delivery value here either. If a minimum cleaning rate is essential, decide on verified output at the setting you intend to use, and keep GC's gas-media role separate from Atem's focus on particles.
The 65-to-471 figures are raw airflow and not pollutant-specific CADR. Raw airflow and minimum decibels, on their own, cannot establish equivalent clean-air delivery or a guaranteed room size.
Which one fits
IQAir GC MultiGas XE lists “12 lb carbon and chemisorption” for gas media, while IQAir Atem X lists “No substantial gas stage listed”. This shows what the treatment path is designed to catch or reduce, and the upkeep it needs.
IQAir GC MultiGas XE lists “275 CFM” for maximum published airflow, while IQAir Atem X lists “471 CFM”. Extra published output only helps when your room, surface or workload needs the headroom. On its own, it does not prove better results.
Once you have handled the source and ventilated, the documented carbon stage can help with lighter smells that keep coming back.
In a room of the right size, its verified particle airflow and filter path are a good match for airborne pollen.
It is a useful pick for airborne dander given its particle performance and pet-home design.
Airflow aimed at dust can cut down particles while they are still in the air. Dust that has already settled stays where it is.
In practice
The published “Maximum published airflow” figure is 71% higher on IQAir Atem X: 471 CFM, against 275 CFM on IQAir GC MultiGas XE.
Higher published output is useful only if your room, surface or workload calls for the extra headroom. It does not, by itself, prove better results. The percentage comes from the lower published figure.

IQAir, GC MultiGas XE
Specialized for gases as well as particles, it carries 12 pounds of adsorption media, stages that can each be serviced on their own and current app automation.

IQAir, Atem X
This premium purifier is wide and shallow. It offers high particle airflow, eight speeds starting from a very low first speed, and richer room sensors.
Spec by spec
| Spec | IQAir GC MultiGas XE | IQAir Atem X | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum published airflow | 275 CFM | 471 CFM | Higher published output is useful only if your room, surface or workload calls for the extra headroom. It does not, by itself, prove better results. |
| Gas media | 12 lb carbon and chemisorption | No substantial gas stage listed | It shows what the treatment path is built to catch or reduce, and what upkeep that requires. |
| Sensors | PM2.5 | PM2.5, CO2, temperature and humidity | It sets how much it can detect, record or navigate on its own, without you stepping in. |
Trade-offs
Decision guide
Start by naming the pollutant. Gas capacity can't be replaced by particle airflow, and CADR can't be replaced by pounds of carbon.
Atem X is published at 471 CFM maximum and GC MultiGas XE at 275 CFM. For particles in a large room, that makes Atem X the clearer choice.
Its four cartridges hold 12 pounds of carbon and chemisorption media, and Atem X lists no equivalent gas bed.
By the numbers
What we found across the air purifiers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQAir GC MultiGas XE |
|
|
|
| IQAir Atem X |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

A documented 12-pound gas and chemical filter is something you need.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Getting the maximum particle airflow comes first.
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money