Side by side

Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42 vs Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42 Compared: Eye relief falls from 20.2 to 15.7 mm as 10x brings more distant detail

Quick verdict

If glasses stay on and you want the longer eye relief, look at the Prostaff P7 8x42 first. The 10x42 is the choice for distant detail, adding 25% magnification at a small cost in field width, though eye relief falls from 20.2 to 15.7 mm.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

Normally you lose more field, but here the loss is small

Only 10 ft of listed field width is lost on the 10x42, and it gains 25% magnification. For a distant stationary subject, that trade is more interesting than the 8x and 10x labels by themselves would suggest.

Where this comes from

At 1,000 yd the fields are 377 and 367 ft, a reduction of 10/377, or 2.7%. Magnification goes up from 8x to 10x.

The catch

Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42

Lower magnification for distant detail

The catch

Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42

Published eye relief is 4.5 mm shorter

Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42

Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42

Why pick it
  • Glasses are on and you want the option with longer eye relief
  • You plan an evening trial of your own to compare its larger calculated exit pupil
The catch
Lower magnification for distant detail
See price & reviews on Amazon
Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42

Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42

Why pick it
  • You mostly watch distant subjects that stay still
  • 10x magnification is worth shorter eye relief to you
The catch
Published eye relief is 4.5 mm shorter
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42 vs 10x42. You get 25% more magnification from the 10x for just 2.7% less field width, though it gives up 4.5 mm of eye relief. See how your glasses fit.

Two P7 models of almost the same size, where the gap in eye relief is far bigger than the gap in field width.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • Birding with glasses on from a set chair

    The 8x42 has more eye-relief allowance to try out.

    Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42
    Better fit
    Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42
    Depends
  • Seeing distant detail by day

    With the 10x42 you get more magnification and only a small stated loss in field.

    Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42
    Good
    Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42
    Better fit
  • On the balcony, a feeder is 8 ft away

    Each needs the subject farther away.

    Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42
    Not suitable
    Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42
    Not suitable
  • You stay where you are while watching into dusk

    The exit-pupil geometry isn’t the same, yet this research doesn’t name a winner for low-light image quality. Compare the view and eye fit for yourself.

    Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42
    Depends
    Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42
    Depends

In practice

Differences you will notice

Normally you lose more field, but here the loss is small

Only 10 ft of listed field width is lost on the 10x42, and it gains 25% magnification. For a distant stationary subject, that trade is more interesting than the 8x and 10x labels by themselves would suggest.

How we worked this out

At 1,000 yd the fields are 377 and 367 ft, a reduction of 10/377, or 2.7%. Magnification goes up from 8x to 10x.

Glasses are where the real compromise shows

Published eye relief is 4.5 mm shorter on the 10x42. A buyer who wears glasses could lose more usable view through a poor personal fit than the field table implies.

How we worked this out

The eye relief figures are 20.2 and 15.7 mm. This doesn’t measure the usable field with any particular pair of glasses.

Stepping up does not bring the feeder any closer

Close focus ends at 9.8 ft on both models. When a small balcony puts the feeder 8 ft away, neither model works for that setup.

How we worked this out

Both official model pages list 9.8 ft close focus, and both adjust across 56–72 mm of eye spacing.

Option A
Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42

Nikon, Prostaff P7 8x42

Prostaff P7 8x42

The 20.2 mm eye relief and the locking diopter are what earn this model a spot on your shortlist. On a small balcony, a feeder may still be too close, as close focus is 9.8 ft.

Best for
Glasses are on and you want the option with longer eye relief

Facts we checked

  • Magnification: 8x
  • Scene width: 377 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Eye relief of 20.2 mm
  • Closest focus of 9.8 ft
Option B
Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42

Nikon, Prostaff P7 10x42

Prostaff P7 10x42

A 367 ft field and a locking diopter come together in the 10x42. The body looks much like the full-size 8x42, but eye relief is shorter.

Best for
You mostly watch distant subjects that stay still

Facts we checked

  • Magnification: 10x
  • Scene width: 367 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Eye relief of 15.7 mm
  • Closest focus of 9.8 ft

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42 and Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42 differ
SpecNikon Prostaff P7 8x42Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42In practice
Magnification8x10x10x is a 25% step up from 8x.
Scene width377 ft at 1,000 yd367 ft at 1,000 ydThe 10x gives up just 2.7% of listed width.
Eye relief20.2 mm15.7 mmFor glasses fit, the 4.5 mm loss is the check that matters more.
Closest focus9.8 ft9.8 ftAn 8 ft feeder is beyond both.
Calculated exit pupil5.25 mm, calculated4.2 mm, calculatedThe geometric beam is larger on the 8x42.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42

  • It still can’t focus any closer than 9.8 ft

With Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42

  • A smaller calculated exit pupil with the same objective diameter

Change of plan

When the answer changes

The 8x42 suits your own glasses better

Go with Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42. That fit is worth more than the extra magnification.

Distant detail is the priority and your glasses work well with both

Go with Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42. In that case the 10x is worth more, since the field-width loss is limited.

The balcony wildlife is close, at 8 ft

Neither model fits. A model with shorter close focus is needed.

Decision guide

How to decide

Start with the Prostaff P7 8x42 if you wear glasses and want the longer eye-relief candidate. Take the 10x42 for distant detail, since a small field-width reduction buys 25% more magnification, with eye relief dropping from 20.2 to 15.7 mm.

01

Normally you lose more field, but here the loss is small

Listed field width drops by only 10 ft on the 10x42, and magnification goes up 25%. With a distant, stationary subject, that trade is more interesting than the 8x and 10x labels alone would suggest. The fields are 377 and 367 ft at 1,000 yd, a reduction of 10/377, or 2.7%, and magnification climbs from 8x to 10x.

02

Glasses are where the real compromise shows

Published eye relief is 4.5 mm shorter on the 10x42. Someone who needs glasses could lose more usable view to a poor personal fit than the field table implies. The figures are 20.2 versus 15.7 mm, and usable field with any particular pair of glasses is not measured here.

03

Stepping up does not bring the feeder any closer

Close focus ends at 9.8 ft on both models, so neither one handles a small balcony that puts the feeder 8 ft away. The two official model pages each list 9.8 ft close focus, and both use 56–72 mm eye-spacing adjustment.

Check these before you buy

  • Both are similar in outer size, so confirm whether you are selecting the 8x42 or the 10x42. Then test whether your glasses allow the full view.
  • With your own glasses on, try the eye spacing, the eyecup position and the full view. Eye-relief figures only help you screen.
  • Count the supplied case, caps and any harness toward bag space and weight. Listed body size does not guarantee the pair will fit.

What this page can’t tell you

  • Nothing here comes from hands-on sharpness, steadiness or brightness tests. The comparisons rest on manufacturer specifications and can be reproduced.
  • Exit pupil is simple arithmetic, objective diameter over magnification. It proves nothing about measured light transmission or which pair wins in low light.
  • Eye relief and body dimensions as published do not guarantee that your glasses fit or that the packed case clears.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the binoculars we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
2 models
Sources
4 covering these models
Product data updated
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
Nikon Prostaff P7 8x42
  • Glasses are on and you want the option with longer eye relief
  • You plan an evening trial of your own to compare its larger calculated exit pupil
  • Magnification: 8x
  • Scene width: 377 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Eye relief of 20.2 mm
  • Closest focus of 9.8 ft
  • Calculated exit pupil: 5.25 mm, calculated
Nikon Prostaff P7 10x42
  • You mostly watch distant subjects that stay still
  • 10x magnification is worth shorter eye relief to you
  • Magnification: 10x
  • Scene width: 367 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Eye relief of 15.7 mm
  • Closest focus of 9.8 ft
  • Calculated exit pupil: 4.2 mm, calculated

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money