Side by side

Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70 vs Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80: 20x80 gives more distant detail, with 69.4% more weight for the tripod to support

Quick verdict

The SkyMaster Pro 15x70 is the pick for easier transport and a wider view. The 20x80 is for stationary distant detail, as long as your tripod, head and storage plan can handle its 86.4 oz body. That extra magnification costs 69.4% more binocular weight.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

More power changes the support budget

Going from 15x to 20x brings 33.3% more magnification but 69.4% more binocular weight. A tripod picked for the lighter model should be rechecked and not assumed to be suitable.

Where this comes from

The weights are 51 and 86.4 oz, an increase of 35.4/51. Magnification goes up from 15x to 20x. Tripod-head behavior hasn’t been measured here.

The catch

Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70

Lower magnification for a distant subject that stays still

The catch

Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80

Comes out 35.4 oz heavier, with a substantially narrower field

Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70

Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70

Why pick it
  • The setup travels with you to a viewing spot
  • A wider scene and extra eye-relief allowance are what you want
The catch
Lower magnification for a distant subject that stays still
See price & reviews on Amazon
Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80

Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80

Why pick it
  • The viewing setup mostly stays in one spot
  • You are after 20x detail and already have support suited to the heavier body
The catch
Comes out 35.4 oz heavier, with a substantially narrower field
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70 vs 20x80. Moving to the 20x80 means 69.4% more body weight and a narrower view. Ask whether your distant subject justifies the heavier setup.

Two waterproof SkyMaster Pro models for supported viewing, where the move to 20x brings a large change in equipment weight.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • You take the whole setup with you away from home

    Before support equipment, 15x70 takes 35.4 oz off the binocular weight.

    Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70
    Better fit
    Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80
    Caution
  • A fixed setup is aimed at stationary distant detail

    With suitable support, 20x gives more magnification.

    Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70
    Good
    Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80
    Better fit
  • A daytime subject stands 55 ft off

    15x70 alone reaches the published focus distance.

    Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70
    Better fit
    Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80
    Not suitable
  • Several viewers need help finding a broad area of sky

    More surrounding scene comes with the wider 231 ft field.

    Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70
    Better fit
    Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80
    Good

In practice

Differences you will notice

More power changes the support budget

Going from 15x to 20x brings 33.3% more magnification but 69.4% more binocular weight. A tripod picked for the lighter model should be rechecked and not assumed to be suitable.

How we worked this out

The weights are 51 and 86.4 oz, an increase of 35.4/51. Magnification goes up from 15x to 20x. Tripod-head behavior hasn’t been measured here.

A narrow balcony view gets narrower still through the binocular

The 20x80 cuts the stated field width by 27.3%. That may be acceptable for a stationary distant feature, but locating and sharing a broad sky area favors the 15x70.

How we worked this out

At 1,000 yd the fields are 231 and 168 ft, a reduction of 63/231, or 27.3%.

A daytime subject at 55 ft flips the preference for high power

At 55 ft the 15x70 can focus, but the 20x80 can’t meet that distance. A mixed day-and-night setup needs the daytime distance checked too.

How we worked this out

The close-focus distances are 49.2 and 66.2 ft. On the larger model eye relief also falls, from 17 to 15.5 mm.

Option A
Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70

Celestron, SkyMaster Pro 15x70

SkyMaster Pro 15x70

Waterproof construction is the addition, since the Pro has the same 231 ft field as the standard 15x70. At 51 oz it still calls for a realistic plan for support and storage.

Best for
The setup travels with you to a viewing spot

Facts we checked

  • Weight before support: 51 oz
  • Magnification: 15x
  • Scene width: 231 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Closest focus: 49.2 ft
Option B
Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80

Celestron, SkyMaster Pro 20x80

SkyMaster Pro 20x80

Choose the support carefully for an 86.4 oz body at 20x. Compared with the Pro 15x70, the 168 ft field is narrower and the 15.5 mm eye relief is shorter.

Best for
The viewing setup mostly stays in one spot

Facts we checked

  • Weight before support: 86.4 oz
  • Magnification: 20x
  • Scene width: 168 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Closest focus: 66.2 ft

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70 and Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80 differ
SpecCelestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80In practice
Weight before support51 oz86.4 ozThe 20x80 body weighs 69.4% more.
Magnification15x20x20x is up 33.3%.
Scene width231 ft at 1,000 yd168 ft at 1,000 yd27.3% of the listed field is lost with 20x80.
Closest focus49.2 ft66.2 ftOnly 15x70 suits the 55 ft example.
Eye relief17 mm15.5 mmOn paper, 15x70 gives 1.5 mm extra.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70

  • Even before support, it’s still a 51 oz body

With Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80

  • Eye relief is shorter and the near-focus limit is 66.2 ft

Change of plan

When the answer changes

Moving the gear and finding broad sky areas matter most

Go with Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70. 15x70 is favored by the lighter body and wider field.

A fixed suitable mount is in place, and you want stationary distant detail

Go with Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80. The heavier system can be justified by the extra magnification.

The daytime job you share is a garden view at 30 ft

Neither model fits. Neither minimum focus distance is short enough.

Decision guide

How to decide

Go with the SkyMaster Pro 15x70 if you value easier transport and a wider view. Go with the 20x80 for stationary distant detail if your tripod, head and storage plan can take its 86.4 oz body, remembering the extra magnification adds 69.4% binocular weight.

01

More power changes the support budget

Going from 15x to 20x brings 33.3% more magnification and 69.4% more binocular weight. A tripod chosen around the lighter model needs another look and should not be assumed to suit the heavier one. Weights are 51 and 86.4 oz, an increase of 35.4/51, and magnification rises from 15x to 20x. Tripod-head behavior is not measured here.

02

A narrow balcony view gets narrower still through the binocular

Stated field width is 27.3% smaller on the 20x80. That can be acceptable for a stationary distant feature, but the 15x70 is better for locating and sharing a broad sky area. The fields are 231 and 168 ft at 1,000 yd, a reduction of 63/231, or 27.3%.

03

A daytime subject at 55 ft flips the preference for high power

Only the 15x70 can focus at 55 ft, because the 20x80 cannot meet that distance. A setup used day and night needs the daytime distance checked as well. Close focus is 49.2 and 66.2 ft, and eye relief on the larger model falls from 17 to 15.5 mm.

Check these before you buy

  • Verify which Pro model it is, and check the tripod-head load and how freely it aims. A listed tripod load by itself does not establish comfort at high viewing angles.
  • Check eye spacing, eyecup position and the full view while wearing your own glasses. Treat eye-relief figures as a way to screen options.
  • Choose a compatible support in advance, and make sure the Amazon package you pick contains the mounting parts you need.
  • Never aim these binoculars at the Sun. Adults need to supervise children.

What this page can’t tell you

  • This all rests on manufacturer specifications and comparisons that can be reproduced. It involves no hands-on tests of sharpness, steadiness or brightness.
  • Dividing objective diameter by magnification gives the exit pupil. That figure does not establish measured light transmission or a winner in low light.
  • Neither published eye relief nor body dimensions guarantees a personal glasses fit or clearance inside a packed case.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the binoculars we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
2 models
Sources
2 covering these models
Product data updated
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
Celestron SkyMaster Pro 15x70
  • The setup travels with you to a viewing spot
  • A wider scene and extra eye-relief allowance are what you want
  • Weight before support: 51 oz
  • Magnification: 15x
  • Scene width: 231 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Closest focus: 49.2 ft
  • Eye relief of 17 mm
Celestron SkyMaster Pro 20x80
  • The viewing setup mostly stays in one spot
  • You are after 20x detail and already have support suited to the heavier body
  • Weight before support: 86.4 oz
  • Magnification: 20x
  • Scene width: 168 ft at 1,000 yd
  • Closest focus: 66.2 ft
  • Eye relief of 15.5 mm

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money