The catch
LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz
Unlike a docking monitor, it offers no USB-C video or laptop charging.
Side by side
Take the 32GR93U if you want a flat 4K gaming screen. If you sit centered and welcome a strong curve, Mini-LED dimming and 240Hz, the Neo G8 is the fit.
Before you buy
LS32BG852NNXGO comes to 137.7 pixels per inch, against about 139.9 for 32GR93U-B. A denser panel can draw finer text at the same logical size, while comfortable scaling determines workspace.
Where this comes from
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. The inputs are 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches and 3840 × 2160 at 32 inches. The figures are approximate because the diagonals are published nominal values.
The catch
Unlike a docking monitor, it offers no USB-C video or laptop charging.
The catch
A strong 1000R curve won't suit every shared desk or design-oriented desk.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
A flat 4K gaming screen points to the 32GR93U. The Neo G8 suits a centered gaming position where a strong curve, Mini-LED dimming and 240Hz are welcome.
A curve alters shared viewing and desk use
Which one fits
Neo G8 has a 1000R curve, while LG 32GR93U is flat. Off-center viewing and mixed desktop layouts may suit a flat screen better.
VA Mini-LED local dimming is what Neo G8 uses. LG uses IPS without the same Mini-LED dimming arrangement, though dimming quality still depends on the scene.
Up to 144 Hz, LG offers a flat 4K image. When 144 Hz already meets the target, Neo G8's higher 240 Hz ceiling is no reason to accept its curved design.
A 1000R curve and a 240 Hz 4K ceiling go together on Neo G8. LG is flat and stops at 144 Hz.
In practice
LS32BG852NNXGO comes to 137.7 pixels per inch, against about 139.9 for 32GR93U-B. A denser panel can draw finer text at the same logical size, while comfortable scaling determines workspace.
Pixels per inch = √(width² + height²) / diagonal. The inputs are 3840 × 2160 at 31.5 inches and 3840 × 2160 at 32 inches. The figures are approximate because the diagonals are published nominal values.
32GR93U-B draws 8.3 million native pixels per frame, and LS32BG852NNXGO draws 8.3 million as well. The refresh ceilings are 144Hz and 240Hz respectively.
Native pixels = width × height. Refresh interval =1000 / Hz, giving 6.9 and 4.2 ms. None of these are measured frame rates, input lag or pixel response, only signal and cadence calculations.
At 240Hz the theoretical interval is 4.17 ms, and at 144Hz it is 6.94 ms.
1000 / 240 = 4.17 ms and 1000 / 144 = 6.94 ms. That describes refresh cadence and is not measured input lag or pixel response.

LG, 32GR93U-B
Games get more physical room on this flat 32-inch 4K screen, and there are plenty of pixels left for work. A 144Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 inputs make it a simple choice for both PC and console.

Samsung, LS32BG852NNXGO
4K detail, a 240Hz ceiling and Mini LED local dimming come together in the Neo G8. Its pronounced curve makes it more of a deliberate gaming-desk pick than a flat office screen.
Spec by spec
| Spec | LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz | Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 32-inch | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 | Usable logical workspace changes with operating-system scaling. |
| Panel diagonal | 31.5 in | 32 in | The measured active diagonal may differ slightly from a nominal screen class. |
| Maximum refresh | 144Hz | 240Hz | Look at the exact input, resolution and overclock conditions. |
| Panel technology | IPS | VA Mini LED | A measured color or motion winner is not established by panel type alone. |
| Laptop power | No USB-C laptop charging | No USB-C laptop charging | For the desired delivery, the host, cable and negotiated power profile all have to support it. |
| Chassis width | 714 mm | Check exact drawing | Leave additional room for cables, arms and neighboring equipment. |
| Stand depth | 278 mm | Check exact drawing | More desk depth can be taken by the included stand than by the display cabinet. |
Trade-offs
Decision guide
The 32GR93U is for a flat 4K gaming screen. The Neo G8 is for a centered gaming position where a strong curve, Mini-LED dimming and 240Hz are welcome.
The Neo G8 has a 1000R curve, whereas the LG is flat. A player sitting centered may like the wrap. Side-by-side work and off-center viewing can favor a flat layout.
About 8.29 million pixels per frame are rendered on each. To use the full ceiling, Samsung's 240Hz needs much higher frame delivery than LG's 144Hz.
VA Mini-LED local dimming is what Samsung uses. LG's IPS differs in black level and viewing angle. A badge alone does not establish how good the dimming is in every scene.
By the numbers
What we found across the computer monitors we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
This guide keeps all 50 models in play. The pick rests on the facts and trade-offs on this page.
50 models fit, out of 50 checkedSamsung Odyssey Neo G8 32-inch lists 240 Hz for top refresh rate, 67% more than the 144 Hz on LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz.
How we countedNo needs are preselected here. Open the matcher and add the ones that apply to your home, room or setup.
How we calculatedFigures use the fastest published refresh mode. Resolution, connection and color settings decide when you get that rate. For context, 44 of 50 models publish comparable figures.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| LG UltraGear 32-inch 4K 144Hz | None of these needs is a documented match |
|
|
| Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 32-inch | None of these needs is a documented match |
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Favor a flat panel for mixed work
See price & reviews on Amazon
Look for Mini-LED local dimming
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money