The catch
Kawai ES920
Computer USB carries MIDI, and no mic input is listed. While a Bluetooth MIDI connection is active, the wired MIDI routes are disabled.
Side by side
Kawai ES920 vs Roland FP-60X for home practice or a singing setup: Roland records vocals and USB audio, while Kawai carries lighter yet sits deeper
Quick verdict
ES920 is the choice for separate left/right internal recording, chord-following backing styles and a lighter carry when music-rest weights are matched. FP-60X is the choice for a mic input and direct USB-audio recording into a computer. Kawai weighs 17.5 kg with its rest against Roland’s 19.3 kg, yet its bare body is 31 mm deeper. Continuous damper pedals and two headphone sockets come with both. Kawai’s USB computer connection is MIDI, and Bluetooth MIDI disables its wired MIDI connections while connected.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
A parent can get the other hand recorded and the laptop stays out of it
When a child practices one hand at a time, the ES920’s two internal recording parts let a parent or teacher prepare the other hand separately. The FP-60X has a single-part internal MIDI recorder and doesn’t offer that kind of separate-part arrangement. Roland can work with compatible computer software over MIDI or audio, but then the computer is part of the practice setup. For a family that wants the piano ready without borrowing the work laptop, Kawai’s two-part recorder is handy. It doesn’t show that the child will learn faster or that audio singing gets recorded on independent tracks.
Where this comes from
Two internal MIDI parts versus one. The example shows what the workflow means in practice and is separate from USB audio or multitrack vocals.
The catch
Roland FP-60X
Its internal MIDI recorder has one part. Recording each hand separately takes another workflow, and the instrument weighs more with the rest fitted.
Kawai ES920
- Why pick it
- You want to record two keyboard parts separately and use the onboard chord-following Rhythm Section with no computer.
- Now and then you move the piano, you favor the documented 17.5 kg with-rest weight, and you have room for its deeper body.
- The catch
- Computer USB carries MIDI, and no mic input is listed. While a Bluetooth MIDI connection is active, the wired MIDI routes are disabled.
Roland FP-60X
- Why pick it
- A suitable microphone is how you sing, and the input should be built into the piano.
- Direct USB audio removes the need for a separate audio input when your regular computer project records the piano’s own sound live.
- The catch
- Its internal MIDI recorder has one part. Recording each hand separately takes another workflow, and the instrument weighs more with the rest fitted.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
What this page compares
Shared practice and recording, ES920 or FP-60X? Compare separate hand parts, backing styles, mic connections and the real trade-off between carrying and desk space.
Both are established upper-midrange portable weighted pianos with speakers, two headphones and continuous pedals. A home player can realistically choose Kawai’s practice/arranger tools or Roland’s mic/computer-audio setup.
Which one fits
Pick the situations that sound like you
A learner wants each hand as a separate part, no computer involved
Kawai has two internal MIDI parts. Roland has one, so that job needs another workflow.
- Kawai ES920
- Better fit
- Roland FP-60X
- Caution
An adult sings and records the hardware sound on a computer
The mic input and USB-audio route are both included with Roland. Kawai calls for suitable extra audio equipment.
- Kawai ES920
- Depends
- Roland FP-60X
- Better fit
Carrying counts for more than a few centimeters of desk depth
With rests fitted, Kawai is 1.8 kg lighter, but its body is 31 mm deeper. Try the whole handling task.
- Kawai ES920
- Better fit
- Roland FP-60X
- Good
A tablet MIDI app has to run along with wired MIDI gear
On Kawai, USB and DIN MIDI are disabled while Bluetooth MIDI is connected. Verify the exact Roland routing, and don’t assume it handles every simultaneous setup.
- Kawai ES920
- Caution
- Roland FP-60X
- Depends
In practice
Differences you will notice
A parent can get the other hand recorded and the laptop stays out of it
When a child practices one hand at a time, the ES920’s two internal recording parts let a parent or teacher prepare the other hand separately. The FP-60X has a single-part internal MIDI recorder and doesn’t offer that kind of separate-part arrangement. Roland can work with compatible computer software over MIDI or audio, but then the computer is part of the practice setup. For a family that wants the piano ready without borrowing the work laptop, Kawai’s two-part recorder is handy. It doesn’t show that the child will learn faster or that audio singing gets recorded on independent tracks.
How we worked this out
Two internal MIDI parts versus one. The example shows what the workflow means in practice and is separate from USB audio or multitrack vocals.
A lighter carry comes with more depth on the shared table
Counting the music rests, the ES920 is 1.8 kg lighter. Its bare body, though, is 31 mm deeper and 49 mm wider than the FP-60X. That is a real trade-off when one adult carries the instrument out for lessons and then clears a work table. Kawai reduces the listed load, and Roland leaves more depth free on a bare table. Measure with the rest and stand you use, and try the full lift. Neither figure shows that a long weighted keyboard is comfortable for a given person to carry.
How we worked this out
19.3 minus 17.5 = 1.8 kg, using weights that include the rest. 375 minus 344 = 31 mm in depth and 1340 minus 1291 = 49 mm in width, both without rests.
A family singer and a solo player each need something different on top
For someone playing alone, the ES920 has a chord-following backing section, but its Line In is not a microphone input. A family member who wants to sing through it needs a suitable line-level feed from other equipment. The FP-60X comes with a mic input and USB audio, which suits singing and recording around a computer, though it lacks Kawai’s equivalent onboard backing-style library. Pick based on which missing piece you’d otherwise have to supply. A long list of piano and synth sounds can’t stand in for a microphone input or accompaniment that follows your chords.
How we worked this out
Based on the complete connector and rhythm-function lists, with Roland’s USB audio and Kawai’s computer MIDI. Line In is not assumed to power or amplify just any microphone.
Option A
Kawai, ES920
ES920
You want to record two keyboard parts separately and use the onboard chord-following Rhythm Section with no computer.
- Best for
- You want to record two keyboard parts separately and use the onboard chord-following Rhythm Section with no computer.
Facts we checked
- Separate internal parts: Two-part MIDI recorder
- Backing arrangement: 100 chord-following Rhythm Section styles
- Computer sound capture: USB-MIDI, audio files to flash
- Singing input: Stereo Line In, no microphone input
Option B
Roland, FP-60X
FP-60X
A suitable microphone is how you sing, and the input should be built into the piano.
- Best for
- A suitable microphone is how you sing, and the input should be built into the piano.
Facts we checked
- Separate internal parts: One-part MIDI recorder
- Backing arrangement: Piano voices and metronome, no matching style library
- Computer sound capture: USB audio/MIDI
- Singing input: Mic input plus stereo analog input
Spec by spec
Where they really differ
| Spec | Kawai ES920 | Roland FP-60X | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Separate internal parts | Two-part MIDI recorder | One-part MIDI recorder | On Kawai, a learner can keep each hand apart with no move to computer software. |
| Backing arrangement | 100 chord-following Rhythm Section styles | Piano voices and metronome, no matching style library | More tones don’t do the same job as musical accompaniment. |
| Computer sound capture | USB-MIDI, audio files to flash | USB audio/MIDI | Recording to flash doesn’t make a live USB-audio interface. |
| Singing input | Stereo Line In, no microphone input | Mic input plus stereo analog input | A suitable mic-level route can spare a simple singing setup one more box. |
| Weight with music rest | 17.5 kg | 19.3 kg | Under these matched definitions, Kawai weighs 1.8 kg less. |
| Body depth without rest | 375 mm | 344 mm | Before rests and cables, Kawai is lighter but 31 mm deeper. |
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With Kawai ES920
- What a line input expects is a suitable line-level source. A bare microphone can’t simply be plugged in instead.
With Roland FP-60X
- A stand and a full three-pedal setup are still optional, even with the DP-10 continuous pedal in the box.
Change of plan
When the answer changes
The main jobs are two-part practice and accompaniment without a computer
Go with Kawai ES920. Those onboard functions come with the ES920, and a continuous pedal is included.
Singing and recording live computer sound turn into weekly activities
Go with Roland FP-60X. The mic and USB-audio inputs for that routine are on the FP-60X.
You need a practice location that runs on batteries
Neither model fits. Each needs its documented AC supply. Go with a model that has a verified battery option.
Decision guide
Before you buy
Lessons, adult music time and occasional moves all have to work on the piano, yet the lighter instrument may need more depth and extra equipment for a singer.
What this page can’t tell you
- No winner has been measured for key action, learning outcome or acoustic noise.
- The carrying figures leave out stands and cases.
- Compatible external equipment is required for a line-level connection.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the digital pianos we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Show the facts and the math
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kawai ES920 |
|
| |
| Roland FP-60X |
|
|
Ready to buy
See today’s price and what owners say
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Kawai ES920
You want to record two keyboard parts separately and use the onboard chord-following Rhythm Section with no computer.
Now and then you move the piano, you favor the documented 17.5 kg with-rest weight, and you have room for its deeper body.
See price & reviews on AmazonRoland FP-60X
A suitable microphone is how you sing, and the input should be built into the piano.
Direct USB audio removes the need for a separate audio input when your regular computer project records the piano’s own sound live.
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money