The catch
Hurom H320
After the recipe, the fine mesh strainer has to be cleaned.
Side by side
Hurom H320 vs H400: H320 lets you vary pulp texture, and H400 does without a conventional fine mesh strainer
Quick verdict
When people in your home want different pulp textures, the H320 is the one to choose. When skipping a conventional fine mesh strainer matters more to you than being able to swap between two juice strainers, choose the H400.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
A swappable strainer suits mixed texture preferences
Say one person dislikes pulp and another wants more texture. The H320 comes with two documented juice strainers, so the next recipe can use a different screen. The H400 matters more when scrubbing that screen is the reason you do not juice regularly.
Where this comes from
The H320 comes with fine and coarse strainers, while the H400 uses a two-part auger for separation and has no conventional mesh strainer. The comparison claims no matched pulp-content test.
The catch
Hurom H400
Even with no mesh strainer, the remaining food-contact parts still have to be cleaned.
Hurom H320
- Why pick it
- Finer juice for some in your household, coarser for others
- The documented 2 L ingredient hopper is what you want
- The catch
- After the recipe, the fine mesh strainer has to be cleaned.
Hurom H400
- Why pick it
- Scrubbing a fine mesh strainer is what holds you back
- A two-part mesh-free auger is your preference
- The catch
- Even with no mesh strainer, the remaining food-contact parts still have to be cleaned.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
What this page compares
See how the Hurom H320 vs H400 differ in separation system, chamber and the practical limits that decide which juicer suits your daily routine.
When people in your home want different pulp textures, the H320 is the one to choose. When skipping a conventional fine mesh strainer matters more to you than being able to swap between two juice strainers, choose the H400.
Which one fits
Pick the situations that sound like you
Two adults whose pulp preferences differ
H320 comes with two juice strainers to pick from.
- Hurom H320
- Better fit
- Hurom H400
- Depends
You skip juicing because of fine mesh cleaning
H400 does without that part.
- Hurom H320
- Caution
- Hurom H400
- Better fit
18-inch vertical space, fixed
Neither assembled height gets under it.
- Hurom H320
- Not suitable
- Hurom H400
- Not suitable
A longer rated session is the goal
Each lists 30 minutes.
- Hurom H320
- Similar
- Hurom H400
- Similar
In practice
Differences you will notice
A swappable strainer suits mixed texture preferences
Say one person dislikes pulp and another wants more texture. The H320 comes with two documented juice strainers, so the next recipe can use a different screen. The H400 matters more when scrubbing that screen is the reason you do not juice regularly.
How we worked this out
The H320 comes with fine and coarse strainers, while the H400 uses a two-part auger for separation and has no conventional mesh strainer. The comparison claims no matched pulp-content test.
Chamber size differs by just a tenth
The H400's juicing chamber holds 50 mL more, a 10% increase. On its own that is a weak reason to switch models. For a household weighing texture preferences against cleanup, the separation parts make the bigger everyday difference.
How we worked this out
The chamber capacities give (550 minus 500) divided by 500 = 10%. Yield was not measured.
Cabinet clearance can rule out both
If you have 18 inches under the upper cabinets, neither listed assembled height will fit. A space only slightly taller still needs room to open and take off the hopper. If your layout allows it safely, plan on pulling the appliance forward.
How we worked this out
The H320 measures 18.2 inches high, the H400 18.5. Extra clearance for opening the lid and disassembly is not measured here.
Option A
Hurom, H320
H320
The self-feeding hopper takes your prepared recipe, and you decide between the fine and coarse strainer based on the result you want.
- Best for
- Finer juice for some in your household, coarser for others
Facts we checked
- Separation system: A fine or a coarse juice strainer
- Chamber of 500 mL
- Assembled height of 18.2 inches
- Can run continuously for up to 30 minutes
Option B
Hurom, H400
H400
Its two-part auger does the separating with no conventional fine mesh screen, so you have different parts to clean after juicing.
- Best for
- Scrubbing a fine mesh strainer is what holds you back
Facts we checked
- Separation system: A two-part auger with no strainer
- Chamber of 550 mL
- Assembled height of 18.5 inches
- Can run continuously for up to 30 minutes
Spec by spec
Where they really differ
| Spec | Hurom H320 | Hurom H400 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Separation system | Fine or coarse juice strainer | Strainer-free two-part auger | With the H320 you pick a strainer on purpose. The H400 changes what cleaning involves. |
| Chamber | 500 mL | 550 mL | Next to the change in separation design, a 50 mL difference is modest. |
| Assembled height | 18.2 inches | 18.5 inches | A 17-inch shelf has room for neither. |
| Continuous use | Up to 30 minutes | Up to 30 minutes | A longer rated session does not come with a larger chamber. |
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With Hurom H320
- The hopper's volume does not tell you how many glasses one recipe will yield.
With Hurom H400
- Standing 18.5 inches high, it calls for tall storage and additional room for opening it.
Change of plan
When the answer changes
Finer juice for some in your household, coarser for others
Go with Hurom H320. You can swap the screen between recipes because the H320 supplies fine and coarse juice strainers.
Scrubbing a fine mesh strainer is what holds you back
Go with Hurom H400. A two-part separation auger takes the place of the conventional fine mesh screen on the H400.
You want evidence that one of them gets more juice out of your exact recipe
Neither model fits. No matched recipe-and-yield test appears in the specifications.
Decision guide
How to decide
Go with the H320 if pulp texture preferences differ across the people using it. Go with the H400 if you rank avoiding a conventional fine mesh strainer above the option to swap between two juice strainers.
A swappable strainer suits mixed texture preferences
Say one person dislikes pulp and another wants more texture. The H320 comes with two documented juice strainers, so the next recipe can use a different screen. The H400 matters more when scrubbing that screen is the reason you do not juice regularly.
Chamber size differs by just a tenth
The H400's juicing chamber holds 50 mL more, a 10% increase. On its own that is a weak reason to switch models. For a household weighing texture preferences against cleanup, the separation parts make the bigger everyday difference.
Cabinet clearance can rule out both
If you have 18 inches under the upper cabinets, neither listed assembled height will fit. A space only slightly taller still needs room to open and take off the hopper. If your layout allows it safely, plan on pulling the appliance forward.
What this page can’t tell you
- Everything recommended here follows documented specifications and stated operating limits. We have not measured matched juice yield, noise, cleaning time or nutritional effects.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the juicers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Show the facts and the math
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hurom H320 |
|
|
|
| Hurom H400 |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
See today’s price and what owners say
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Hurom H320
Finer juice for some in your household, coarser for others
See price & reviews on AmazonHurom H400
Scrubbing a fine mesh strainer is what holds you back
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money