The catch
Hurom H330
Lifting it out for each use means dealing with its 16 lb weight.
Side by side
Hurom H330 vs H320: The paint-free body of the H330 adds weight and no extra hopper or chamber capacity
Quick verdict
The H320 is the choice if you move the juicer often, since it states the same hopper and chamber sizes at a lower listed weight. The H330 is the choice if its paint-free body matters to you.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
The newer name may not change your daily batch
The 2 L ingredient hopper and 500 mL chamber are the same on both. If your household is already content with that routine, the H330 name gives no evidence of a larger batch or fewer refills. Pick it because you prefer its body. Do not assume a capacity upgrade.
Where this comes from
The exact US product pages for both give an identical hopper, chamber and 30-minute standard usage.
The catch
Hurom H320
After the recipe, the fine mesh strainer has to be cleaned.
Hurom H330
- Why pick it
- A paint-free body is a specific requirement for you
- You keep the juicer in a single spot
- The catch
- Lifting it out for each use means dealing with its 16 lb weight.
Hurom H320
- Why pick it
- You pick the machine up after each use
- Matching listed hopper and chamber capacity is what you want
- The catch
- After the recipe, the fine mesh strainer has to be cleaned.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
What this page compares
Hurom H330 vs H320 compared by ingredient hopper, juicing chamber and the practical limits that determine which juicer fits your daily routine.
The H320 is the choice if you move the juicer often, since it states the same hopper and chamber sizes at a lower listed weight. The H330 is the choice if its paint-free body matters to you.
Which one fits
Pick the situations that sound like you
Cupboard storage every day
The listed weight is lower on the H320.
- Hurom H330
- Good
- Hurom H320
- Better fit
You specifically want a paint-free exterior
The H330 documents that body option.
- Hurom H330
- Better fit
- Hurom H320
- Depends
Hoping for a bigger recipe hopper
Both list 2 L.
- Hurom H330
- Similar
- Hurom H320
- Similar
Switching between a fine and a coarser juice
The two juice strainers come with both.
- Hurom H330
- Good
- Hurom H320
- Good
In practice
Differences you will notice
The newer name may not change your daily batch
The 2 L ingredient hopper and 500 mL chamber are the same on both. If your household is already content with that routine, the H330 name gives no evidence of a larger batch or fewer refills. Pick it because you prefer its body. Do not assume a capacity upgrade.
How we worked this out
The exact US product pages for both give an identical hopper, chamber and 30-minute standard usage.
Storage is what makes the weight gap count
Going by current manufacturer specifications, the H320 weighs 2.3 lb less. Taking it out of a cupboard twice per session is where that difference is worth checking. With a permanent counter station, it counts for far less.
How we worked this out
The gap, 16 minus 13.7 = 2.3 lb, comes from listed appliance weight. No lifting test was measured.
Body material says nothing about juice quality
The H330 explicitly documents a paint-free body. The H320 lists an ABS body but does not say how it is coated. If documented paint-free construction is on your shopping list, the H330 gives you that confirmation. It does not show better extraction, nutrition or easier internal cleaning. Fine and coarse strainers come with both, and both need cleaning after use.
How we worked this out
The evidence is the H330 finish description plus both included-part lists. No matched yield, nutrient or cleaning-time test backs up a performance upgrade.
Option A
Hurom, H330
H330
The juice strainers in the box let you change the texture, and the body is paint-free with a large hopper for prepared ingredients.
- Best for
- A paint-free body is a specific requirement for you
Facts we checked
- Ingredient hopper holds 2 L
- Juicing chamber holds 500 mL
- The product weighs 16 lb
- Continuous use is limited to 30 minutes
Option B
Hurom, H320
H320
The self-feeding hopper takes your prepared recipe, and you decide between the fine and coarse strainer based on the result you want.
- Best for
- You pick the machine up after each use
Facts we checked
- Ingredient hopper holds 2 L
- Juicing chamber holds 500 mL
- The product weighs 13.7 lb
- Continuous use is limited to 30 minutes
Spec by spec
Where they really differ
| Spec | Hurom H330 | Hurom H320 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredient hopper | 2 L | 2 L | By this measure, neither one holds more per batch. |
| Juicing chamber | 500 mL | 500 mL | Chamber capacity stays the same too. |
| Product weight | 16 lb | 13.7 lb | The H320 is 2.3 lb lighter on listed appliance weight. |
| Continuous-use limit | 30 minutes | 30 minutes | The stated run allowance is not longer on the newer body. |
| Documented paint-free body | Explicitly confirmed by Hurom | Coating method not specified | A paint-free exterior requirement is what the H330 addresses. The H320 lists an ABS body and does not specify how it is coated. Nothing here establishes a difference in health or juice quality. |
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With Hurom H330
- You still have to clean the fine strainer after each use.
With Hurom H320
- The hopper's volume does not tell you how many glasses one recipe will yield.
Change of plan
When the answer changes
A paint-free body is a specific requirement for you
Go with Hurom H330. The H330 documents a paint-free exterior, and its hopper and chamber sizes are the same as the H320’s.
You pick the machine up after each use
Go with Hurom H320. Stated hopper and chamber capacity are the same on the H320, which lists an appliance weight 2.3 lb lower.
Your only reason to replace the H320 is more hopper capacity
Neither model fits. The listed H330 specifications show no increase in hopper or chamber capacity.
Decision guide
How to decide
If you move the juicer a lot and want the same stated hopper and chamber sizes but a lower listed weight, take the H320. If the paint-free body matters to you as a material choice, take the H330.
The newer name may not change your daily batch
The 2 L ingredient hopper and 500 mL chamber are the same on both. If your household is already content with that routine, the H330 name gives no evidence of a larger batch or fewer refills. Pick it because you prefer its body. Do not assume a capacity upgrade.
Storage is what makes the weight gap count
Going by current manufacturer specifications, the H320 weighs 2.3 lb less. Taking it out of a cupboard twice per session is where that difference is worth checking. With a permanent counter station, it counts for far less.
Body material says nothing about juice quality
The H330 explicitly documents a paint-free body. The H320 lists an ABS body but does not say how it is coated. If documented paint-free construction is on your shopping list, the H330 gives you that confirmation. It does not show better extraction, nutrition or easier internal cleaning. Fine and coarse strainers come with both, and both need cleaning after use.
What this page can’t tell you
- Specifications and stated operating limits from documentation drive these recommendations. Matched juice yield, noise, cleaning time and nutritional effects have not been measured by us.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the juicers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Show the facts and the math
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hurom H330 |
|
|
|
| Hurom H320 |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
See today’s price and what owners say
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Hurom H330
A paint-free body is a specific requirement for you
See price & reviews on AmazonHurom H320
You pick the machine up after each use
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money