The catch
Nama J2
Its 17.7-inch height rules out a 17-inch shelf before the hopper is even opened.
Side by side
Nama J2 vs Hurom H400: J2 is easier to store and lift, H400 drops conventional fine-mesh cleaning
Quick verdict
The J2 is the pick if its lower listed weight and height suit your daily storage routine. The H400 is the pick if avoiding a conventional fine mesh strainer is why you are switching juicers.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
These two split at an 18-inch shelf
On paper the J2 sits 0.3 inches under an 18-inch shelf, and the H400 sits 0.5 inches over it. That small J2 margin only tells you whether it can be stored there. You still need to be able to lift the machine out and open the hopper safely.
Where this comes from
18 minus 17.7 = 0.3, while the H400 stands 18.5 high. Closed appliance dimensions do not establish operating clearance.
The catch
Hurom H400
Even with no mesh strainer, the remaining food-contact parts still have to be cleaned.
Nama J2
- Why pick it
- The juicer gets moved after each use
- Your space is better matched to a 17.7-inch height
- The catch
- Its 17.7-inch height rules out a 17-inch shelf before the hopper is even opened.
Hurom H400
- Why pick it
- A mesh-free separation design is what you want
- There is a taller space where the juicer can remain assembled
- The catch
- Even with no mesh strainer, the remaining food-contact parts still have to be cleaned.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
What this page compares
Nama J2 vs Hurom H400 weighed on loading, height and the practical limits that decide which juicer fits your daily routine.
The J2 is the pick if its lower listed weight and height suit your daily storage routine. The H400 is the pick if avoiding a conventional fine mesh strainer is why you are switching juicers.
Which one fits
Pick the situations that sound like you
A shared counter with lifting again and again
On the listed specifications, the J2 weighs less.
- Nama J2
- Better fit
- Hurom H400
- Good
Your main complaint is fine mesh cleaning
That specific component differs on the H400.
- Nama J2
- Depends
- Hurom H400
- Better fit
18-inch shelf for closed storage
On paper the J2 fits under it, and the H400 does not.
- Nama J2
- Good
- Hurom H400
- Not suitable
Loading a recipe in one go
That routine works with both.
- Nama J2
- Good
- Hurom H400
- Good
In practice
Differences you will notice
These two split at an 18-inch shelf
On paper the J2 sits 0.3 inches under an 18-inch shelf, and the H400 sits 0.5 inches over it. That small J2 margin only tells you whether it can be stored there. You still need to be able to lift the machine out and open the hopper safely.
How we worked this out
18 minus 17.7 = 0.3, while the H400 stands 18.5 high. Closed appliance dimensions do not establish operating clearance.
A lighter machine may see more use in a shared kitchen
The J2 is 2.7 lb lighter. When your counter also serves as prep space and the juicer has to be moved every morning, that gap deserves attention. When it stays put, the H400's separation design may be the advantage that matters more.
How we worked this out
The difference is 14.8 minus 12.1 = 2.7 lb, about 18% of the H400 listed weight. No claim is made about anyone’s lifting ability.
Batch loading does not decide cleanup
You can preload prepared ingredients on both, so a hands-free label cannot separate the whole routine. Look instead at what is left in the sink afterward. The H400 does away with the conventional mesh strainer, yet the auger and chamber still have to be cleaned.
How we worked this out
Self-feeding hoppers are documented on both manufacturer pages. The H400 documents a strainer-free multi-auger. There is no matched cleaning-time test.
Option A
Nama, J2
J2
A good match if you like to load prepared ingredients in one go and can give the assembled machine a permanent spot.
- Best for
- The juicer gets moved after each use
Facts we checked
- Loading: Via a self-feeding hopper
- Height of 17.7 inches
- Weight: 12.1 lb
- Separation approach: A chamber that uses a strainer
Option B
Hurom, H400
H400
Its two-part auger does the separating with no conventional fine mesh screen, so you have different parts to clean after juicing.
- Best for
- A mesh-free separation design is what you want
Facts we checked
- Loading: Via a self-feeding hopper
- Height of 18.5 inches
- Weighs 14.8 lb
- Separation approach: A two-part auger without a strainer
Spec by spec
Where they really differ
| Spec | Nama J2 | Hurom H400 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading | Self-feeding hopper | Self-feeding hopper | Prepared recipes loaded together suit both. |
| Height | 17.7 inches | 18.5 inches | For a storage shelf, this difference can settle things before recipe preferences come into it. |
| Weight | 12.1 lb | 14.8 lb | A lift with the J2 is 2.7 lb lighter. |
| Separation approach | Strainer-based chamber | Strainer-free two-part auger | With the H400, cleanup no longer includes a conventional mesh strainer. |
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With Nama J2
- Loading the hopper does not promise a set juice yield.
With Hurom H400
- Standing 18.5 inches high, it calls for tall storage and additional room for opening it.
Change of plan
When the answer changes
The juicer gets moved after each use
Go with Nama J2. Listed specifications make the J2 lighter by 2.7 lb and shorter by 0.8 inches.
A mesh-free separation design is what you want
Go with Hurom H400. Cleanup is different on the H400 because the conventional fine mesh juice strainer is gone.
The assembled unit has to fit under a 17-inch shelf
Neither model fits. Each stands above 17 inches, and that is before you open the hopper.
Decision guide
How to decide
Go with the J2 if the lower listed weight and height work better with how you store it each day. Go with the H400 if you are changing juicers to get away from a conventional fine mesh strainer.
These two split at an 18-inch shelf
On paper the J2 sits 0.3 inches under an 18-inch shelf, and the H400 sits 0.5 inches over it. That small J2 margin only tells you whether it can be stored there. You still need to be able to lift the machine out and open the hopper safely.
A lighter machine may see more use in a shared kitchen
The J2 is 2.7 lb lighter. When your counter also serves as prep space and the juicer has to be moved every morning, that gap deserves attention. When it stays put, the H400's separation design may be the advantage that matters more.
Batch loading does not decide cleanup
You can preload prepared ingredients on both, so a hands-free label cannot separate the whole routine. Look instead at what is left in the sink afterward. The H400 does away with the conventional mesh strainer, yet the auger and chamber still have to be cleaned.
What this page can’t tell you
- Recommendations here rely on documented specifications and stated operating limits. Matched juice yield, noise, cleaning time and nutritional effects are outside what we have measured.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the juicers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Show the facts and the math
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nama J2 |
|
| |
| Hurom H400 |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
See today’s price and what owners say
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Nama J2
The juicer gets moved after each use
See price & reviews on AmazonHurom H400
A mesh-free separation design is what you want
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money