The catch
Nama J2
Its 17.7-inch height rules out a 17-inch shelf before the hopper is even opened.
Side by side
Nama J2 vs J3: Daily cupboard storage points to J3, larger prepared counter batches to J2
Quick verdict
If the juicer has to return to a cupboard after every use, the J3 is the one to get. If it can stay on the counter and you regularly make larger prepared recipes, go with the J2.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
Cupboard height can flip the choice
Picture a renter with a shared counter and a 17-inch shelf. The J3 clears that closed-height limit and is lighter to lift. The J2 stands 0.7 inches above the shelf, so its larger batch format does nothing for you if the juicer must be kept somewhere else.
Where this comes from
17 minus 15.4 = 1.6 inches is the closed-height allowance for J3. The height of J2 is 17.7 inches. Open-lid clearance is left out.
The catch
Nama J3
A big recipe may take more rounds of loading because of the smaller format.
Nama J2
- Why pick it
- The juicer can stay assembled on your counter
- A larger batch format suits you better
- The catch
- Its 17.7-inch height rules out a 17-inch shelf before the hopper is even opened.
Nama J3
- Why pick it
- The shelf you store it on is just 17 inches high
- Putting away a lighter machine matters to you
- The catch
- A big recipe may take more rounds of loading because of the smaller format.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
What this page compares
Weigh the Nama J2 vs J3 on assembled height, listed body rectangle and the practical limits that decide which juicer suits your daily routine.
If the juicer has to return to a cupboard after every use, the J3 is the one to get. If it can stay on the counter and you regularly make larger prepared recipes, go with the J2.
Which one fits
Pick the situations that sound like you
A 17-inch storage shelf in a small apartment
J3 alone meets that closed-height screen.
- Nama J2
- Not suitable
- Nama J3
- Better fit
Larger prepared recipes at a permanent counter station
The larger batch format suits the J2 better.
- Nama J2
- Better fit
- Nama J3
- Good
Lifting it out of a low cupboard every day
The J3 is 2.4 lb lighter.
- Nama J2
- Caution
- Nama J3
- Better fit
Expecting a set number of glasses from one hopper
Output shifts with fruit, cut size and recipe.
- Nama J2
- Caution
- Nama J3
- Caution
In practice
Differences you will notice
Cupboard height can flip the choice
Picture a renter with a shared counter and a 17-inch shelf. The J3 clears that closed-height limit and is lighter to lift. The J2 stands 0.7 inches above the shelf, so its larger batch format does nothing for you if the juicer must be kept somewhere else.
How we worked this out
17 minus 15.4 = 1.6 inches is the closed-height allowance for J3. The height of J2 is 17.7 inches. Open-lid clearance is left out.
Measure the full counter setup
Compared with the J2, the J3 body rectangle is about 34% smaller. That may free up usable room next to a cutting board, yet the juice and pulp containers still need a place to sit. Measure the assembled station before you decide.
How we worked this out
For J2 the rectangle is 9.8 × 9 = 88.2 square inches. For J3 it is 8.9 × 6.5 = 57.85. That is a reduction of 34.4%. The figure is a bounding rectangle and not an operating footprint.
Put-away routines make the weight gap count for more
At 2.4 lb lighter, the J3 weighs roughly 20% less than the J2. Lifting it out and putting it away every morning is when that counts. When either machine stays on the counter, the advantage matters far less and batch size can drive the decision.
How we worked this out
The gap is 12.1 minus 9.7 = 2.4 lb, and 2.4 divided by 12.1 = 19.8%. Neither comfort nor grip was tested.
Option A
Nama, J2
J2
A good match if you like to load prepared ingredients in one go and can give the assembled machine a permanent spot.
- Best for
- The juicer can stay assembled on your counter
Facts we checked
- Assembled height of 17.7 inches
- Body rectangle listed at 9.8 by 9 inches
- Weighs 12.1 lb with the chamber
- Ingredient loading: Via a self-feeding hopper
Option B
Nama, J3
J3
When storage space is tighter but you still want to load prepared ingredients together, the shorter and lighter J3 fits.
- Best for
- The shelf you store it on is just 17 inches high
Facts we checked
- Assembled height of 15.4 inches
- Body rectangle listed at 8.9 by 6.5 inches
- Weighs 9.7 lb with the chamber
- Ingredient loading: Via a self-feeding hopper
Spec by spec
Where they really differ
| Spec | Nama J2 | Nama J3 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assembled height | 17.7 inches | 15.4 inches | The assembled J2 cannot go on a 17-inch shelf, but the J3 leaves 1.6 inches before handling clearance is counted. |
| Listed body rectangle | 9.8 by 9 inches | 8.9 by 6.5 inches | A smaller body rectangle comes with the J3, and both still need their own room for collection containers. |
| Weight with chamber | 12.1 lb | 9.7 lb | Each lift is 2.4 lb lighter with the smaller model. |
| Ingredient loading | Self-feeding hopper | Self-feeding hopper | Loading prepared ingredients together works on both, so the compact size does not mean feeding one piece at a time down a chute. |
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With Nama J2
- Loading the hopper does not promise a set juice yield.
With Nama J3
- Measure with the lid open and along your route to storage. Measuring the closed machine alone is not enough.
Change of plan
When the answer changes
The juicer can stay assembled on your counter
Go with Nama J2. On a permanent station, the J2’s height and extra 2.4 lb are less of a bother.
The shelf you store it on is just 17 inches high
Go with Nama J3. At 15.4 inches high and 9.7 lb, the J3 fits under the stated shelf and is lighter to lift.
Every hopper load has to give you a guaranteed amount of finished juice
Neither model fits. No product sheet converts ingredient volume into a fixed recipe yield for either model.
Decision guide
How to decide
Go with the J3 if a cupboard is where the juicer ends up after each use. Go with the J2 if it can live on the counter and your routine regularly includes larger prepared recipes.
Cupboard height can flip the choice
Picture a renter with a shared counter and a 17-inch shelf. The J3 clears that closed-height limit and is lighter to lift. The J2 stands 0.7 inches above the shelf, so its larger batch format does nothing for you if the juicer must be kept somewhere else.
Measure the full counter setup
Compared with the J2, the J3 body rectangle is about 34% smaller. That may free up usable room next to a cutting board, yet the juice and pulp containers still need a place to sit. Measure the assembled station before you decide.
Put-away routines make the weight gap count for more
At 2.4 lb lighter, the J3 weighs roughly 20% less than the J2. Lifting it out and putting it away every morning is when that counts. When either machine stays on the counter, the advantage matters far less and batch size can drive the decision.
What this page can’t tell you
- These recommendations come from documented specifications and stated operating limits. We have not measured matched juice yield, noise, cleaning time or nutritional effects.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the juicers we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Show the facts and the math
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nama J2 |
|
| |
| Nama J3 |
|
|
Ready to buy
See today’s price and what owners say
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Nama J2
The juicer can stay assembled on your counter
See price & reviews on AmazonNama J3
The shelf you store it on is just 17 inches high
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money