Side by side

ASUSTOR AS5402T vs AS5404T: Four NVMe slots on each, though only 5404T holds four hard drives

Quick verdict

If two hard drives cover your storage plan and you want the narrower case, go with the AS5402T. For a larger hard-drive array, or two-drive fault tolerance with RAID 6, go with the AS5404T. Four NVMe slots, the same processor family and dual 2.5GbE come on both already, so none of those features calls for the larger chassis.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

Capacity with one-drive protection can triple with four hard drives

Take compatible equal 12 TB drives. Two-drive RAID 1 gives 12 TB before overhead, and four-drive RAID 5 gives 36 TB. That means AS5404T delivers three times the illustrative usable capacity and still tolerates one drive failure, though you pay for two more drives.

Where this comes from

For RAID 1, 2 × 12 TB mirrored = 12 TB. For RAID 5, (4 - 1) × 12 TB = 36 TB. 36 / 12 = 3. A separate backup is still necessary.

The catch

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

The internal hard-drive array is held back by having two SATA bays.

The catch

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2

The chassis runs 60 mm wider.

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

Why pick it
  • Stay with two hard drives in a narrower case
  • Put together an NVMe project with no extra SATA bays to buy
The catch
The internal hard-drive array is held back by having two SATA bays.
See price & reviews on Amazon
ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2

Why pick it
  • Set up a larger protected array of three or four hard drives
  • Run RAID 6 protection across four hard drives
The catch
The chassis runs 60 mm wider.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

Family storage, Plex and SSD projects on ASUSTOR AS5402T vs AS5404T. Two extra hard-drive bays change usable capacity, but they add no faster networking.

If two hard drives cover your storage plan and you want the narrower case, go with the AS5402T. For a larger hard-drive array, or two-drive fault tolerance with RAID 6, go with the AS5404T. Four NVMe slots, the same processor family and dual 2.5GbE come on both already, so none of those features calls for the larger chassis.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • My capacity needs are covered by two mirrored hard drives

    That layout fits AS5402T, which has a narrower enclosure.

    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Better fit
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2
    Good
  • I plan on RAID 6 across four hard drives

    The four SATA bays that internal hard-drive array needs are on AS5404T.

    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Not suitable
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2
    Better fit
  • I plan on four NVMe drives

    Four M.2 positions are on each. Check which drives are compatible and what storage configuration you intend.

    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Good
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2
    Good
  • Speed per Ethernet port is what I want to raise

    Each supplies 2.5GbE ports, and the larger chassis does not raise their link rate.

    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Similar
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2
    Similar

In practice

Differences you will notice

Capacity with one-drive protection can triple with four hard drives

Take compatible equal 12 TB drives. Two-drive RAID 1 gives 12 TB before overhead, and four-drive RAID 5 gives 36 TB. That means AS5404T delivers three times the illustrative usable capacity and still tolerates one drive failure, though you pay for two more drives.

How we worked this out

For RAID 1, 2 × 12 TB mirrored = 12 TB. For RAID 5, (4 - 1) × 12 TB = 36 TB. 36 / 12 = 3. A separate backup is still necessary.

The hard-drive plan shifts with two-drive protection

RAID 6 across four 12 TB hard drives gives 24 TB before overhead and tolerates two drive failures. AS5402T cannot build that four-hard-drive array internally. The four NVMe slots on it are a separate storage option and do not count as extra hard-drive bays.

How we worked this out

Usable capacity for RAID 6 is (4 - 2) × 12 TB = 24 TB. SATA bays number 2 on one model and 4 on the other.

The bigger model gives an all-NVMe plan no extra slots

For a project that uses only NVMe drives, both models have four positions. The four-bay version is 60 mm wider in the case and has no more slots for it. The smaller chassis can therefore handle the same four-NVMe layout.

How we worked this out

4 NVMe slots on both models, while AS5404T has 174 - 114 = 60 mm more case width.

Option A
ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

ASUSTOR, AS5402T

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

A 2-bay chassis whose fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.

Best for
Stay with two hard drives in a narrower case

Facts we checked

  • SATA bays inside: 2
  • NVMe slots: 4
  • Processor: Intel Celeron N5105
  • Installed / maximum RAM: 4 GB / 16 GB
Option B
ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2

ASUSTOR, AS5404T

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2

A 4-bay chassis whose fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.

Best for
Set up a larger protected array of three or four hard drives

Facts we checked

  • SATA bays inside: 4
  • NVMe slots: 4
  • Processor: Intel Celeron N5105
  • Installed / maximum RAM: 4 GB / 16 GB

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2 and ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2 differ
SpecASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2In practice
Internal SATA bays24More hard drives can go into a single internal array on the larger model.
NVMe slots44Stepping up brings no extra NVMe positions.
ProcessorIntel Celeron N5105Intel Celeron N5105Both use the same CPU specification. A higher model number does not show more transcoding capacity.
Installed / maximum RAM4 GB / 16 GB4 GB / 16 GBThe official memory ceiling is identical on both.
Built-in EthernetTwo 2.5GbE portsTwo 2.5GbE portsMoving up leaves the speed of each individual network port unchanged.
Case width114 mm174 mmIn the datasheets, height and depth match and the four-bay chassis needs 60 mm more width.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

  • Growing the hard-drive pool later may mean replacing the enclosure.

With ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2

  • It brings no extra NVMe slots, RAM ceiling or faster built-in Ethernet.

Change of plan

When the answer changes

I'm after four internal hard drives

Go with ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2. Four SATA bays are found only on AS5404T.

I want four NVMe slots and at most two SATA drives

Go with ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2. That slot layout fits AS5402T in a narrower case.

I require native 10GbE

Neither model fits. Built-in Ethernet is 2.5GbE on both, not 10GbE.

Decision guide

How to decide

01

Settle the protected capacity first, then the enclosure

Begin with the files you must keep, how much you expect them to grow and a separate backup copy. For a household, two large mirrored hard drives may be enough. A video archive that keeps growing can make four bays the cheaper way to expand, though you are then buying more drives and a wider case.

02

Plan hard drives and NVMe on separate tracks

From its name, the AS5402T might seem limited to two storage devices, yet it also has four NVMe positions. Those slots suit compatible SSD storage or caching, but they cannot take large SATA hard drives. Work out which medium your workload needs before leaning on total slot count.

03

More bays will not fix a slow network

Dual 2.5GbE comes on both models. A computer that still goes through a 1GbE switch stays limited by that path. Extra drives may help a storage workload, but the slow network segment will not go away. Before paying for a larger chassis to fix a transfer-speed problem, check the client, switch and cabling.

Check these before you buy

  • Add the compatible drives to the price of the diskless NAS.
  • Important files need an independent backup too.
  • Work out if the project calls for SATA capacity, NVMe storage or both.

What this page can’t tell you

  • Storage figures assume compatible drives of equal capacity and decimal TB, counted before formatting, system space and metadata. RAID covers the drive failures it is specified for, but it does not replace a separate backup.
  • Treat network figures as link rates. They are not measured file-transfer speeds. For the exact model you buy, check software support, memory revision, drive compatibility and the rest of the network.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the NAS devices we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
2 models
Sources
2 covering these models
Product data updated
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
  • Stay with two hard drives in a narrower case
  • Put together an NVMe project with no extra SATA bays to buy
  • SATA bays inside: 2
  • NVMe slots: 4
  • Processor: Intel Celeron N5105
  • Installed / maximum RAM: 4 GB / 16 GB
  • Onboard Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE ports
  • Case width: 114 mm
ASUSTOR Nimbustor 4 Gen2
  • Set up a larger protected array of three or four hard drives
  • Run RAID 6 protection across four hard drives
  • SATA bays inside: 4
  • NVMe slots: 4
  • Processor: Intel Celeron N5105
  • Installed / maximum RAM: 4 GB / 16 GB
  • Onboard Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE ports
  • Case width: 174 mm

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money