Side by side

ASUSTOR Flashstor 6 vs Nimbustor 2 Gen2 Compared: Only Nimbustor keeps SATA drives, while Flashstor takes six SSDs

Quick verdict

Flashstor 6 is the pick for an all-NVMe storage layout built on six M.2 drives. The AS5402T is the pick when two SATA drives must stay in the plan next to up to four NVMe drives. Dual 2.5GbE ports come on both, so six SSDs do not automatically make one computer transfer files faster.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

Hard drives you already own can settle the enclosure

Two internal SATA drives fit in AS5402T, while Flashstor 6 has no SATA bays.

Where this comes from

Each chassis lists six total drive positions, yet the media formats differ.

The catch

ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

This chassis cannot take existing SATA HDDs.

The catch

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

NVMe drives are accepted by just four positions.

ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

Why pick it
  • Go with six internal NVMe drives
  • Make the whole drive layout SSD
The catch
This chassis cannot take existing SATA HDDs.
See price & reviews on Amazon
ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

Why pick it
  • Carry over two compatible SATA drives
  • Add HDD capacity to four NVMe positions
The catch
NVMe drives are accepted by just four positions.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

Reusing hard drives, six NVMe positions and identical dual 2.5GbE networking: Flashstor 6 against AS5402T.

Flashstor 6 is the pick for an all-NVMe storage layout built on six M.2 drives. The AS5402T is the pick when two SATA drives must stay in the plan next to up to four NVMe drives. Dual 2.5GbE ports come on both, so six SSDs do not automatically make one computer transfer files faster.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • Repurpose two internal SATA HDDs

    Flashstor lacks SATA bays.

    ASUSTOR Flashstor 6
    Not suitable
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Better fit
  • Fit six internal NVMe drives

    Four M.2 slots are on AS5402T.

    ASUSTOR Flashstor 6
    Better fit
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Not suitable
  • Run one built-in 2.5GbE connection

    The per-port rating is the same on both.

    ASUSTOR Flashstor 6
    Similar
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Similar
  • Need eight internal NVMe drives

    Six slots come with Flashstor 6 and four with AS5402T.

    ASUSTOR Flashstor 6
    Not suitable
    ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
    Not suitable

In practice

Differences you will notice

Hard drives you already own can settle the enclosure

Two internal SATA drives fit in AS5402T, while Flashstor 6 has no SATA bays.

How we worked this out

Each chassis lists six total drive positions, yet the media formats differ.

A different capacity plan comes with six NVMe drives

Two more M.2 positions than AS5402T come with Flashstor.

How we worked this out

Two additional NVMe positions come from six minus four. The figure assigns no RAID level and promises no usable capacity.

An all-SSD box still ends up on the same network sockets

Each built-in port on both chassis is 2.5GbE.

How we worked this out

Limits on drive media and on network line rate are separate. Combining ports takes a supported complete setup.

Option A
ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

ASUSTOR, FS6706T

ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

Its fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps, and the chassis offers 6 primary M.2 NVMe storage slots.

Best for
Go with six internal NVMe drives

Facts we checked

  • Bays for SATA: None
  • NVMe slots in M.2: 6
  • Onboard Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE ports
  • RAM installed: 4 GB
Option B
ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

ASUSTOR, AS5402T

ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

A 2-bay chassis whose fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.

Best for
Carry over two compatible SATA drives

Facts we checked

  • SATA bays: 2
  • NVMe slots in M.2: 4
  • Onboard Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE ports
  • RAM installed: 4 GB

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where ASUSTOR Flashstor 6 and ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2 differ
SpecASUSTOR Flashstor 6ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2In practice
SATA baysNone2The Nimbustor chassis or separate external storage is what existing SATA HDDs need.
M.2 NVMe slots64Only on Flashstor is the sixth drive position an NVMe position.
Built-in EthernetTwo 2.5GbE portsTwo 2.5GbE portsThe drive media leaves per-port networking unchanged.
Installed RAM4 GB4 GBRAM capacity at the start is the same in the selected packages.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With ASUSTOR Flashstor 6

  • The available network interfaces are still shared by six NVMe drives.

With ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2

  • Two HDDs fill both SATA bays right away.

Change of plan

When the answer changes

You need six NVMe positions

Go with ASUSTOR Flashstor 6. Six M.2 slots are on Flashstor.

Two SATA HDDs have to stay internal

Go with ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2. Two SATA bays are on AS5402T.

I require a built-in 10GbE port

Neither model fits. Unlike another model in its family, the six-slot Flashstor is dual 2.5GbE.

Decision guide

How to decide

01

Hard drives you already own can settle the enclosure

When two compatible NAS HDDs already hold the archive, the AS5402T can take them into a new layout that also has four NVMe positions. Flashstor needs an all-NVMe plan, or separate storage for those HDDs. Reusing drives does not mean an existing array can simply be inserted without migration, so verify the data-transfer rules first.

02

A different capacity plan comes with six NVMe drives

Of these two models, a planned six-drive NVMe array requires Flashstor. The AS5402T can reach six physical drives by mixing two SATA and four NVMe positions, but that is a different media layout. Before calculating useful capacity, check that the operating system supports the pools and redundancy you intend.

03

An all-SSD box still ends up on the same network sockets

Pick Flashstor for its media layout. Do not assume it gives faster single-cable access. The AS5402T can use NVMe too, and both connect through the same per-port speed rating. For one workstation, verify its adapter and storage workload. No matched evidence here shows that one produces better editing performance or lower room noise.

Check these before you buy

  • Confirm the exact FS6706T identity instead of borrowing Flashstor 12 Pro specifications.
  • Map out the data migration and keep a separate backup.

What this page can’t tell you

  • Comparative noise, transfer and editing benchmarks were not performed.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the NAS devices we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
2 models
Sources
4 covering these models
Product data updated
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
ASUSTOR Flashstor 6
  • Go with six internal NVMe drives
  • Make the whole drive layout SSD
  • Bays for SATA: None
  • NVMe slots in M.2: 6
  • Onboard Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE ports
  • RAM installed: 4 GB
ASUSTOR Nimbustor 2 Gen2
  • Carry over two compatible SATA drives
  • Add HDD capacity to four NVMe positions
  • SATA bays: 2
  • NVMe slots in M.2: 4
  • Onboard Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE ports
  • RAM installed: 4 GB

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money