The catch
UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus
Additional drives are needed to get the capacity advantage.
Side by side
UGREEN DXP8800 Plus vs DXP6800 Pro Compared: Having two more bays does not mean a six-drive workload runs faster
Quick verdict
Seven or eight internal SATA drives, or spare physical positions once six are installed, make the case for the DXP8800 Plus. When six bays are enough, the DXP6800 Pro does the job. The published processor, native Ethernet, NVMe socket count and memory ceiling are the same on both, so the eight-bay name does not establish a faster six-drive workload.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
Capacity left after parity changes with eight drives
Equal 12 TB drives in RAID 6 give a nominal 72 TB against 48 TB before overhead.
Where this comes from
(8 minus 2) times 12 comes to 72, and (6 minus 2) times 12 comes to 48. That is a gap of 24 TB, or 50 percent.
The catch
UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro
A six-drive installation uses up every SATA bay.
UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus
- Why pick it
- Fit seven or eight SATA drives inside
- Leave two SATA positions open once six drives are in
- The catch
- Additional drives are needed to get the capacity advantage.
UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro
- Why pick it
- Plan on six internal SATA drives or fewer
- Get the same published CPU and native network setup
- The catch
- A six-drive installation uses up every SATA bay.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
What this page compares
Eight versus six SATA bays, spare-drive positions and shared hardware, with DXP8800 Plus and DXP6800 Pro compared.
Seven or eight internal SATA drives, or spare physical positions once six are installed, make the case for the DXP8800 Plus. When six bays are enough, the DXP6800 Pro does the job. The published processor, native Ethernet, NVMe socket count and memory ceiling are the same on both, so the eight-bay name does not establish a faster six-drive workload.
Which one fits
Pick the situations that sound like you
Fit eight SATA drives inside
Eight bays are found only on DXP8800 Plus.
- UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus
- Better fit
- UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro
- Not suitable
Six drives go in and two bays stay empty
The six-bay model has no free bay left.
- UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus
- Better fit
- UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro
- Not suitable
Run two native 10GbE ports
That arrangement is included in both.
- UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus
- Good
- UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro
- Good
Need supported RAM above 64 GB
Each publishes a 64 GB ceiling.
- UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus
- Not suitable
- UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro
- Not suitable
In practice
Differences you will notice
Capacity left after parity changes with eight drives
Equal 12 TB drives in RAID 6 give a nominal 72 TB against 48 TB before overhead.
How we worked this out
(8 minus 2) times 12 comes to 72, and (6 minus 2) times 12 comes to 48. That is a gap of 24 TB, or 50 percent.
Starting with six drives leaves different physical options
Six SATA drives fill DXP6800 Pro completely and leave two bays empty in DXP8800 Plus.
How we worked this out
Two spare physical positions result from eight minus six, and zero from six minus six.
An eighth bay does not upgrade the processor
The same Core i5-1235U, dual 10GbE, two NVMe sockets and 64 GB RAM ceiling appear in both listings.
How we worked this out
Because that hardware is documented as common to both, it gives no reason to expect a better six-drive application result.
Option A
UGREEN, DXP8800 Plus
UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus
One chassis holds eight SATA bays and two NVMe sockets, with dual native 10GbE, for a larger drive plan.
- Best for
- Fit seven or eight SATA drives inside
Facts we checked
- SATA bays inside: 8
- CPU: Intel Core i5-1235U
- Built-in Ethernet: Two 10GbE ports
- Sockets for NVMe: 2
Option B
UGREEN, DXP6800 Pro
UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro
It has two native 10GbE ports, six SATA bays, two NVMe sockets and a supported memory ceiling of 64 GB.
- Best for
- Plan on six internal SATA drives or fewer
Facts we checked
- SATA bays inside: 6
- CPU: Intel Core i5-1235U
- Built-in Ethernet: Two 10GbE ports
- Sockets for NVMe: 2
Spec by spec
Where they really differ
| Spec | UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus | UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internal SATA bays | 8 | 6 | The long-term physical drive plan shifts with two additional bays. |
| Processor | Intel Core i5-1235U | Intel Core i5-1235U | Here the model names do not point to different CPU generations. |
| Native Ethernet | Two 10GbE ports | Two 10GbE ports | Identical rated interfaces do not guarantee identical measured speed. |
| NVMe sockets | 2 | 2 | SATA drives go in the two extra bays, and additional onboard NVMe drives do not. |
| Installed and maximum memory | 8 GB, expandable to 64 GB | 8 GB, expandable to 64 GB | The stated capacity boundary for a memory-heavy application is the same. |
| RAID 6 support | Supported | Supported | Over different bay totals, the same two-drive parity allocation applies. |
| Illustrative RAID 6 capacity with equal 12 TB SATA drives | 72 TB before overhead with eight drives | 48 TB before overhead with six drives | Two drives worth of capacity is reserved for parity in the example, which leaves out formatting, system use and growth reserve. |
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus
- A larger bay count leaves the published RAM and NVMe limit unchanged.
With UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro
- Larger drives or a different storage plan may be needed for growth.
Change of plan
When the answer changes
I require more than six internal SATA drives
Go with UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus. Eight bays come with DXP8800 Plus.
The lifetime plan is covered by six internal drives
Go with UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro. The same published CPU and interface class come with DXP6800 Pro.
I require eight onboard NVMe SSDs
Neither model fits. Two M.2 sockets come with each.
Decision guide
How to decide
Capacity left after parity changes with eight drives
A library already past the six-drive example has a concrete reason to use the DXP8800 Plus. The extra capacity comes from buying and installing two additional drives. Leave room for system data, formatting, snapshots and growth. The NVMe sockets are not part of these totals, and no particular rebuild time is promised.
Starting with six drives leaves different physical options
When growth is likely, decide now whether the empty positions are worth reserving. They may take a later supported expansion or a separately planned pool, but an empty bay does not prove the current RAID configuration can grow without being recreated. Check the UGOS migration instructions before making that part of the purchase case.
An eighth bay does not upgrade the processor
For a fixed six-drive project, compare the chassis purchase and placement requirements. Do not assume the DXP8800 Plus will run containers or Plex faster. The larger box adds SATA positions. It adds no onboard NVMe positions and no higher published memory limit. No matched application or storage test establishes a speed advantage here.
What this page can’t tell you
- Capacity figures are illustrative decimal values taken before overhead. There is no matched throughput, noise, energy or failure-rate result.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the NAS devices we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Show the facts and the math
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus |
|
|
|
| UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
See today’s price and what owners say
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
UGREEN NASync DXP8800 Plus
Fit seven or eight SATA drives inside
See price & reviews on AmazonUGREEN NASync DXP6800 Pro
Plan on six internal SATA drives or fewer
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money