The catch
BLUETTI AC180
It weighs about 35.27 pounds, much more than newer 1kWh models, and has just one USB-C port.
Side by side
Carrying the station often, or possibly adding a battery, points to the C1000. A fixed spot suits the AC180, which has a little more built-in energy.
Before you buy
Modeled at a steady 300W load, BLUETTI AC180 lasts about 3.1 hours and Anker SOLIX C1000 2.8 hours.
Where this comes from
Hours = nominal Wh × 0.8 / 300W, with inputs of 1152Wh and 1056Wh. The 80% factor is a planning allowance shared by both for unusable energy and conversion losses, and it isn’t a measured efficiency. Idle draw, temperature and the real load all change runtime.
The catch
It weighs about 35.27 pounds, much more than newer 1kWh models, and has just one USB-C port.
The catch
Compared with the C1000 Gen 2 it weighs more and has a lower continuous AC rating. The two generations also don’t share the same expansion path.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
The C1000 is the pick if you carry the station often or might add a battery. For a fixed spot, the AC180 packs a little more built-in energy.
A little extra runtime costs a lot to carry
Which one fits
The AC180 stores 96Wh more and weighs 6.83 pounds more. In our 300W example that extra energy buys only about 15 minutes, so stairs may settle this purchase.
AC180 weighs 35.27 lb against 28.44 lb for C1000. Saving 6.83 lb helps on repeated trips between a vehicle and campsite, at the cost of about 15 modeled minutes at 300W.
Under the shared planning case, BLUETTI AC180 comes to 3.1 hours and Anker SOLIX C1000 to 2.8. Measure real wattage before settling on a required overnight reserve.
BLUETTI AC180 takes a maximum input of 500W and Anker SOLIX C1000 600W. Check your actual panel strings against the voltage and current limits as well as this total.
In practice
Modeled at a steady 300W load, BLUETTI AC180 lasts about 3.1 hours and Anker SOLIX C1000 2.8 hours.
Hours = nominal Wh × 0.8 / 300W, with inputs of 1152Wh and 1056Wh. The 80% factor is a planning allowance shared by both for unusable energy and conversion losses, and it isn’t a measured efficiency. Idle draw, temperature and the real load all change runtime.
BLUETTI AC180 comes to about 32.7 nominal watt-hours per pound and Anker SOLIX C1000 to 37.1.
Divide nominal energy by published weight: 1152 / 35.27 and 1056 / 28.44. The result compares stored energy per lifting weight and is not a measure of efficiency or handle comfort.
In this model, the AC180 gains about 15 minutes at a constant 300W and adds 6.83 lb over the C1000.
(1152 - 1056) × 0.8 / 300 × 60 = 15.36 minutes, and 35.27 - 28.44 = 6.83 lb. The 80% usable-energy factor is an assumption made for planning.

BLUETTI, AC180
This 1,152Wh station has four US AC outlets, a wireless charging pad and a 1,800W inverter. The extra battery reserve means a noticeably heavier carry.

Anker SOLIX, A1761
The original C1000 combines 1,056Wh with an 1,800W inverter and can take a matching expansion battery. It still makes sense when adding capacity is a higher priority than saving weight.
Spec by spec
| Spec | BLUETTI AC180 | Anker SOLIX C1000 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal battery energy | 1152 Wh | 1056 Wh | The starting runtime budget comes from stored energy. |
| Continuous AC output | 1800 W | 1800 W | Load screening uses this sustained rating, which is separate from surge and boost modes. |
| Lifting weight | 35.27 lb | 28.44 lb | Flat ground is where wheels help. A trunk, step or shelf still takes a lift. |
| Maximum solar input | 500 W | 600 W | Panel voltage, current and per-port limits have to fit as well. |
| Dedicated battery expansion | Fixed base capacity | Supported with compatible equipment | Integrated battery expansion is not the same as charging from an external source. |
| Published transfer limit | 20 ms | 20 ms | Check the exact device being connected. Even a short transfer specification can’t guarantee that every load runs without interruption. |
Trade-offs
Decision guide
Pick the C1000 if you often carry the station or may add a battery. For a fixed spot, the AC180 offers a bit more built-in energy.
The AC180 stores 96Wh more and weighs 6.83 pounds more. In our 300W example that extra energy buys only about 15 minutes, so stairs may settle this purchase.
Each is rated for 1,800W continuous output. A boost mode’s bigger number doesn’t make either one the right supply for a voltage-sensitive appliance above that rating.
A dedicated expansion option exists for the original C1000. The AC180 can be recharged from a compatible external source, though that is a charging arrangement and not the same integrated battery system.
By the numbers
What we found across the portable power stations we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Only 6 of the 50 models checked meet every need here: “I need power at campsites and on weekends away”, “I want backup power for the essentials at home”, and “Solar will be a real part of how I recharge”.
6 models fit, out of 50 checkedBLUETTI AC180 lists 1,152 Wh for battery capacity, 9% more than the 1,056 Wh on Anker SOLIX C1000.
How we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “I need power at campsites and on weekends away”, “I want backup power for the essentials at home”, and “Solar will be a real part of how I recharge”. A need with no documented match is not counted.
How we calculatedThese are nominal watt-hour ratings. How much energy you get out depends on inverter losses, temperature and load. For context, 50 of 50 models publish comparable figures.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| BLUETTI AC180 |
|
|
|
| Anker SOLIX C1000 |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Park the station next to the appliance
See price & reviews on Amazon
Move it between car and campsite
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money