The catch
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro
Even though it holds 50% more battery energy, the 220W solar input is the same ceiling as on the RIVER 2 Max.
Side by side
Easier travel with small appliances points to the RIVER 2 Pro. For supported loads above 800W and a longer built-in reserve, step up to the AC180.
Before you buy
With a steady 300W load, the model gives EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro about 2 hours and BLUETTI AC180 3.1 hours.
Where this comes from
Hours = nominal Wh × 0.8 / 300W, with 768Wh and 1152Wh going in. The 80% factor is a shared planning allowance for unusable energy and conversion losses. It does not come from a measured efficiency. Runtime moves with idle draw, temperature and the real load.
The catch
Even though it holds 50% more battery energy, the 220W solar input is the same ceiling as on the RIVER 2 Max.
The catch
It weighs about 35.27 pounds, much more than newer 1kWh models, and has just one USB-C port.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
The RIVER 2 Pro is the choice for easier travel with small appliances. The AC180 is the step up for supported loads above 800W and a longer built-in reserve.
Output rises more than capacity does
Which one fits
At 18.2 lb versus 35.27 lb, RIVER 2 Pro saves 17.07 lb, which is useful on a longer walk as long as its 800W rating and 768Wh battery cover the trip.
RIVER 2 Pro is rated at 800W continuous against 1,800W for AC180. A 1,000W running appliance calls for the higher rating, but check startup demand and outlet requirements first.
Under the common planning assumptions, EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro reaches 2 hours and BLUETTI AC180 reaches 3.1. Measure the real wattage before you pick the overnight reserve you require.
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro accepts up to 220W of input and BLUETTI AC180 up to 500W. This total is only one check. Your panel strings must also meet the voltage and current limits.
In practice
With a steady 300W load, the model gives EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro about 2 hours and BLUETTI AC180 3.1 hours.
Hours = nominal Wh × 0.8 / 300W, with 768Wh and 1152Wh going in. The 80% factor is a shared planning allowance for unusable energy and conversion losses. It does not come from a measured efficiency. Runtime moves with idle draw, temperature and the real load.
BLUETTI AC180 stores 32.7 nominal watt-hours per pound, while EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro stores about 42.2.
These figures are nominal energy over published weight, 768 / 18.2 and 1152 / 35.27. They compare stored energy per lifted weight and not measured efficiency or handle comfort.
Over RIVER 2 Pro, AC180 brings 125% more continuous output and 50% more nominal capacity, and about 94% more weight.
(35.27 / 18.2 - 1) × 100 = 93.8%. 1152 / 768 - 1 = 0.5. 1800 / 800 - 1 = 1.25.

EcoFlow, EFR620
This 768Wh camping station has 800W continuous AC output and a handy 100W USB-C port. You get extra battery reserve without the weight of a full 1kWh unit.

BLUETTI, AC180
This 1,152Wh station has four US AC outlets, a wireless charging pad and a 1,800W inverter. The extra battery reserve means a noticeably heavier carry.
Spec by spec
| Spec | EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro | BLUETTI AC180 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal battery energy | 768 Wh | 1152 Wh | The starting runtime budget comes from stored energy. |
| Continuous AC output | 800 W | 1800 W | Load screening uses this sustained rating, which is separate from surge and boost modes. |
| Lifting weight | 18.2 lb | 35.27 lb | Flat ground is where wheels help. A trunk, step or shelf still takes a lift. |
| Maximum solar input | 220 W | 500 W | Panel voltage, current and per-port limits have to fit as well. |
| Dedicated battery expansion | Fixed base capacity | Fixed base capacity | Integrated battery expansion is not the same as charging from an external source. |
| Published transfer limit | 30 ms | 20 ms | Check the exact device being connected. Even a short transfer specification can’t guarantee that every load runs without interruption. |
Trade-offs
Decision guide
Pick the RIVER 2 Pro for easier travel with small appliances. Step up to the AC180 for supported loads above 800W and a longer built-in reserve.
The AC180 takes the continuous inverter rating from 800W to 1,800W, more than double, while battery capacity grows by half.
The AC180 comes in at 35.27 pounds, against 18.2. It’s a better fit for a vehicle or a fixed position than for a long walk to a picnic spot.
The AC180 takes 500W of solar, versus 220W for the RIVER 2 Pro. You only get that benefit with enough compatible panel area and usable sunlight.
By the numbers
What we found across the portable power stations we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Only 6 of the 50 models checked meet every need here: “I need power at campsites and on weekends away”, “I want backup power for the essentials at home”, and “Solar will be a real part of how I recharge”.
6 models fit, out of 50 checkedBLUETTI AC180 lists 1,800 W for continuous AC output rating, 125% more than the 800 W on EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro.
How we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “I need power at campsites and on weekends away”, “I want backup power for the essentials at home”, and “Solar will be a real part of how I recharge”. A need with no documented match is not counted.
How we calculatedFigures are the continuous output rating. Surge numbers and boost modes that lower voltage do not count. For context, 47 of 50 models publish comparable figures.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro |
|
|
|
| BLUETTI AC180 |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Move the unit a longer distance
See price & reviews on Amazon
A supported appliance of yours goes above 800W
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money