Side by side

Thule Force 3 L vs L Sport: Sport has a narrower shell, leaving shared roof space without shortening ski fit

Quick verdict

Wider luggage points to Force 3 L, while crossbars that must also carry a bicycle point to L Sport. The Sport narrows the shell and still has the same 175 cm ski allowance.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

The Sport frees up bar width

Measured outside, L Sport comes in 8.6 inches narrower than Force 3 L.

Where this comes from

On the same rack, 33.3 - 24.7 = 8.6 inches of nominal width is freed up.

The catch

Thule Force 3 L

Skis from 180 to 200 cm are too long for it.

The catch

Thule Force 3 L Sport

Longer touring and Nordic skis exceed its 175 cm ski limit.

Thule Force 3 L

Thule Force 3 L

Why pick it
  • Your suitcases are wide
  • The cargo box gets the whole roof
The catch
Skis from 180 to 200 cm are too long for it.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Thule Force 3 L Sport

Thule Force 3 L Sport

Why pick it
  • A bike has to fit next to the box
  • The box comes off often
The catch
Longer touring and Nordic skis exceed its 175 cm ski limit.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

See how Force 3 L and L Sport differ in roof width, box weight and interior shape, and in how much luggage fits beside another roof-mounted carrier.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • Your suitcases are wide

    Outside, Force 3 L is 8.6 inches wider. Compare actual case dimensions with each interior opening.

    Thule Force 3 L
    Better fit
    Thule Force 3 L Sport
    Depends
  • A bike has to fit next to the box

    Although L Sport is narrower, usable bar space and the other carrier still call for a combined fit check.

    Thule Force 3 L
    Depends
    Thule Force 3 L Sport
    Better fit
  • The cargo box gets the whole roof

    L Sport has 11 cubic feet, against 16 cubic feet for Force 3 L. What L Sport gives in return is nine pounds less empty weight.

    Thule Force 3 L
    Better fit
    Thule Force 3 L Sport
    Good
  • Your narrow box has to take skis over 175 cm and up to 210 cm

    Neither of the compared boxes goes past 175 cm. Horizon Alpine lists a 210 cm ski allowance and passenger-side access.

    Thule Force 3 L
    Not suitable
    Thule Force 3 L Sport
    Not suitable

In practice

Differences you will notice

The Sport frees up bar width

Measured outside, L Sport comes in 8.6 inches narrower than Force 3 L.

How we worked this out

On the same rack, 33.3 - 24.7 = 8.6 inches of nominal width is freed up.

The loss of volume is big

Sport loses five cubic feet but keeps the 175 cm ski limit.

How we worked this out

16 - 11 = 5 cubic feet, and 5 / 16 × 100 = 31.25% less nominal space.

The narrow shell suits frequent removal

With L Sport, the empty lift drops from 43 to 34 pounds.

How we worked this out

43 - 34 = 9 pounds of empty weight saved.

Option A
Thule Force 3 L

Thule, Force 3 L

Thule Force 3 L

It offers 16 cubic feet and fits gear up to 175 centimeters in length.

Best for
take skis along with the seats left up and suit a shorter roof

Facts we checked

  • Capacity is 16 cubic feet.
  • Gear up to 175 centimeters long fits.
  • Dualside access is how it opens.
  • Its published exterior size is 76.8 x 33.3 x 16.8 inches.
Option B
Thule Force 3 L Sport

Thule, 645650

Force 3 L Sport

Built for smaller loads that share the roof with other gear, this narrow box uses the Force 3 mounting and locking hardware.

Best for
Leaving space on the crossbars for a bike carrier

Facts we checked

  • Advertised volume of 11 cubic feet
  • Published maximum ski length of 175 cm
  • Measures 75.2 by 24.7 by 16.7 inches outside
  • Empty: 34 pounds
  • Published internal height of 14.4 inches

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where Thule Force 3 L and Thule Force 3 L Sport differ
SpecThule Force 3 LThule Force 3 L SportIn practice
Cargo volume16 cu ft11 cu ftOnce each bag's dimensions are checked, compare the space they need.
Exterior length76.8 in75.2 inLook at where the shell sits on the roof, how the hatch moves and where it is stored.
Exterior width33.3 in24.7 inIt takes up crossbar room that could otherwise go to a bike carrier.
Empty box weight43 lb34 lbBefore you allocate cargo, take the shell and rack off the vehicle roof limit.
Exterior height16.8 in16.7 inOverall shell height is useful for comparing bulk and says nothing certain about installed garage clearance.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With Thule Force 3 L

  • At 16.8 inches above the crossbar, it is not built for low garages.

With Thule Force 3 L Sport

  • With a 20.2-inch interior that is narrow, wide suitcases fit poorly.

Change of plan

When the answer changes

Your narrow box has to take skis over 175 cm and up to 210 cm

Neither model fits. With passenger-side access, Horizon Alpine lists a 210 cm ski allowance and a 21-inch exterior width. Confirm roof fit and hatch clearance.

Decision guide

How to decide

01

The Sport frees up bar width

Since a bike carrier needs room for its mounts, handlebar and pedal, the 8.6-inch difference only gives you a starting point and does not guarantee a fit. Place both carriers on your real bars first, before you assume the bicycle can sit safely beside the box.

02

The loss of volume is big

Two skiers whose boots ride in the trunk may find the slim shell sufficient. A family putting several broad bags on the roof will get more from the regular L. Having an identical ski limit does not mean equal room for poles, helmets and clothing.

03

The narrow shell suits frequent removal

Each time the box comes off for garage storage, you feel the weight difference. Both have PowerClick clamps and dual-side access, so pick the Sport because the box itself is narrower and lighter. The mounting routine is the same.

Check these before you buy

  • Get the dimensions of your longest and tallest cargo before settling on a shell.
  • Look up the fit guide for your exact vehicle and crossbars, then add up the weight of the rack, empty box and luggage.

What this page can’t tell you

  • Wind noise, fuel use and the way a given bag packs around the mounting hardware are things cargo dimensions and manufacturer load ratings cannot predict.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the roof cargo boxes we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

How many fit

18 of the 26 models checked meet every need here: “Haul camping gear” and “Load from both sides”.

18 models fit, out of 26 checked
Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
26 models
Sources
3 covering these models
Product data updated

How we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “Haul camping gear” and “Load from both sides”. A need with no documented match is not counted.

The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
Thule Force 3 L
  • Haul camping gear
  • Load from both sides
  • Capacity is 16 cubic feet.
  • Gear up to 175 centimeters long fits.
  • Dualside access is how it opens.
Thule Force 3 L Sport
  • Haul camping gear
  • Load from both sides
  • Advertised volume of 11 cubic feet
  • Published maximum ski length of 175 cm
  • Measures 75.2 by 24.7 by 16.7 inches outside

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money