The catch
Aqara Smart Lock B50
A compatible Aqara hub is still needed for Matter.
Side by side
Aqara Smart Lock B50 vs Schlage Arrive Camelot: Both already manage codes over Wi-Fi, and Arrive supplies physical buttons
Quick verdict
B50 is the choice if you want direct Wi-Fi control now and a documented route into Matter through an Aqara hub later. Schlage Arrive Camelot is the choice for its physical silicone buttons and documented 250-code capacity. For that basic task, remote app control over 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, neither needs an extra bridge.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
Having no hub is a narrower claim than universal smart-home access
Each reaches its own app directly over Wi-Fi. If the requirement shifts to Matter, B50 needs additional compatible Aqara hardware, so that future system deserves a budget line of its own.
Where this comes from
Aqara documents built-in Wi-Fi for remote control, and for Matter it separately requires compatible hubs such as M3, G5 or M100. Direct Wi-Fi app access is what Schlage documents.
The catch
Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel
The Arrive documentation that was reviewed establishes no Matter path.
Aqara Smart Lock B50
- Why pick it
- Bring in Matter down the road via a supported Aqara hub
- Have a USB-C emergency-power option on the exterior
- The catch
- A compatible Aqara hub is still needed for Matter.
Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel
- Why pick it
- Work with physical backlit silicone buttons
- Handle as many as 250 access codes in Schlage Home
- The catch
- The Arrive documentation that was reviewed establishes no Matter path.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
What this page compares
On a US door, how do Aqara B50 and Schlage Arrive Camelot compare for direct Wi-Fi control, guest codes, keypad feel and an optional Matter bridge?
B50 is the choice if you want direct Wi-Fi control now and a documented route into Matter through an Aqara hub later. Schlage Arrive Camelot is the choice for its physical silicone buttons and documented 250-code capacity. For that basic task, remote app control over 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, neither needs an extra bridge.
Which one fits
Pick the situations that sound like you
I want remote control and don’t want to buy a hub
Each uses direct 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi for the remote controls in its own app.
- Aqara Smart Lock B50
- Good
- Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel
- Good
Later on, I want this lock added to Matter
A documented route through a compatible Aqara hub exists for B50. The Arrive page that was reviewed doesn’t establish Matter support.
- Aqara Smart Lock B50
- Better fit
- Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel
- Caution
I must assign 200 separate guest codes
A 250-code capacity is published for Arrive. For that workload, B50’s capacity needs confirming.
- Aqara Smart Lock B50
- Depends
- Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel
- Better fit
I’d like raised physical buttons
Its backlit silicone push-button keypad is specifically documented by Schlage.
- Aqara Smart Lock B50
- Depends
- Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel
- Better fit
In practice
Differences you will notice
Having no hub is a narrower claim than universal smart-home access
Each reaches its own app directly over Wi-Fi. If the requirement shifts to Matter, B50 needs additional compatible Aqara hardware, so that future system deserves a budget line of its own.
How we worked this out
Aqara documents built-in Wi-Fi for remote control, and for Matter it separately requires compatible hubs such as M3, G5 or M100. Direct Wi-Fi app access is what Schlage documents.
Arrive has a published answer for a 200-code plan
Arrive’s stated 250-code ceiling has room for two hundred unique codes, with 50 slots left unused. The B50 page that was reviewed doesn’t establish an equivalent capacity, so none can be promised for that plan.
How we worked this out
250 documented Arrive codes - 200 planned codes = 50 spare slots. No numerical code limit is asserted for B50.
Battery failure and Wi-Fi failure call for different responses
Neither lock’s batteries are drained by a Wi-Fi outage in itself. A depleted B50 can get temporary external power through its USB-C port. With Arrive, keep the physical backup key on hand and don’t expect the app to power the lock.
How we worked this out
Four AA batteries power both. USB-C emergency power is documented by Aqara. Schlage documents that codes keep working during network outages and supplies a backup key.
Option A
Aqara, DL-D12E
Smart Lock B50
Remote app control works without an extra hub on this Wi-Fi keypad deadbolt, which also has physical backup keys and optional Aqara Matter bridging.
- Best for
- Bring in Matter down the road via a supported Aqara hub
Facts we checked
- Remote app control: Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- Matter path: Via a compatible Aqara hub
- Keypad: Backlit keypad with anti-peep codes
- Guest-code documentation: Permanent and offline password options
Option B
Schlage, BE459WB CAM 619
Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel
Physical backlit buttons, remote code management and a physical backup key come on a deadbolt that uses direct-Wi-Fi.
- Best for
- Work with physical backlit silicone buttons
Facts we checked
- Remote app control: Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- Matter path: No Matter route documented on the reviewed Arrive page
- Keypad: Physical silicone buttons, backlit
- Guest-code documentation: Up to 250 access codes with scheduling
Spec by spec
Where they really differ
| Spec | Aqara Smart Lock B50 | Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remote app control | Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi | Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi | For the remote lock controls in its own app, neither needs a separate bridge. |
| Matter path | Via a compatible Aqara hub | No Matter route documented on the reviewed Arrive page | Remote control without a hub on B50 and its Matter support that depends on a hub are different features. |
| Keypad | Backlit keypad with anti-peep codes | Backlit physical silicone buttons | Buyers who want buttons they can feel are who Arrive specifically suits. |
| Guest-code documentation | Permanent and offline password options | Up to 250 access codes with scheduling | The capacity is clearly published by Schlage. No B50 capacity is inferred in this comparison. |
| Emergency power | Exterior USB-C emergency-power port | Four AA batteries and physical backup key | B50 has an external power route as well. Even so, both need a planned backup entry method. |
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With Aqara Smart Lock B50
- Its maximum guest-code capacity isn’t established by the page that was reviewed.
With Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel
- No documented exterior USB-C emergency-power option comes with it.
Change of plan
When the answer changes
I need a capacity of 200 codes that is published
Go with Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel. Arrive lists 250 code slots.
I want the Aqara-to-Matter bridge route that is documented
Go with Aqara Smart Lock B50. Compatible Aqara hubs give B50 Matter support.
Decision guide
How to decide
B50 suits you if you want direct Wi-Fi control now and a documented route into Matter through an Aqara hub later. Schlage Arrive Camelot suits you if physical silicone buttons and documented 250-code capacity matter. For basic remote app control over 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, both work without an extra bridge.
Keep today's remote control apart from tomorrow's integrations
A simple Wi-Fi installation, where the main job is checking and operating the door from the manufacturer's app, suits both locks. B50 gets interesting if you already use Aqara devices or plan to add Matter. The bridge requirement comes with that later integration and not with the basic Wi-Fi function.
Guest access may come down to capacity
Arrive's published 250-code limit gives you a concrete number to plan around if the household is large or the visitor list changes often. In the page reviewed here, B50 documents several password workflows but no comparable limit. If you need a large access-code roster, confirm the required capacity directly before relying on it.
Fit and a backup way in come first
This comparison assumes a conventional, compatible US deadbolt installation. Check the exact bore, backset, door clearance and supplied strike hardware, and keep a physical key where it will be useful. The emergency-power port on B50 gives you another way to recover, and Arrive's physical buttons may suit people who dislike touchscreen-style entry.
What this page can’t tell you
- Radio range, battery runtime, keypad usability and resistance to forced entry have not been measured by us. We leave B50's unspecified code capacity as unknown.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the smart locks we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
Show the facts and the math
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aqara Smart Lock B50 |
|
| |
| Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel |
|
|
Ready to buy
See today’s price and what owners say
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
Aqara Smart Lock B50
Bring in Matter down the road via a supported Aqara hub
See price & reviews on AmazonSchlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel
Work with physical backlit silicone buttons
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money