Schlage Arrive vs Encode: Encode uses a touchscreen, while Arrive offers physical buttons and more codes
Quick verdict
Physical-button users and anyone with a larger access-code roster are the fit for Arrive. Encode is aimed at buyers who prefer a touchscreen and its explicitly documented built-in forced-entry alarm.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
150 additional code slots come with Arrive
Its stated capacity is 2.5 times what Encode has.
Where this comes from
250 minus 100 is 150. 250 divided by 100 is 2.5. This measures roster capacity and says nothing about security strength.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States
What this page compares
Schlage Arrive and Encode Camelot are set against each other on physical buttons, code capacity, exterior size and documented alarm features for a direct-Wi-Fi door.
In practiceDon’t assume parity. Functions that aren’t documented should be treated as unknown.
Door range
Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin NickelMaker 1.375 to 2 inches, exact listing says 1.75 maximum
Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim1.375 to 1.75 inches
In practiceBefore relying on the broader maker figure for Arrive, confirm the kit.
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt, Camelot Satin Nickel
Stored codes keep working through a network outage, but operating the lock remotely requires 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi.
With Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot trim
You get neither Apple Home Key nor a fingerprint reader.
Change of plan
When the answer changes
Apple home key is non-negotiable
Neither model fits. Neither standard Encode nor Arrive provides Apple home key, and Encode Plus adds it.
Decision guide
How to decide
For physical buttons and a larger access-code roster, pick Arrive. For a touchscreen and the explicitly documented built-in forced-entry alarm, pick Encode.
01
If you host guests often
Only when many individual codes must stay active does Arrive's 250-code capacity help. A small household may never come near either limit. Good code management still comes down to removing old access and giving each visitor a suitable schedule.
02
In day-to-day keypad use
Physical buttons give your fingers a distinct tactile target. The Encode touchscreen is flatter and works differently. Base the choice on the people who use the door, not on an assumption that the newer interface is easier for everyone.
03
For the door finish you have
An unpainted outline left by a larger old escutcheon may show around the narrower Arrive exterior. Measure the old footprint and the distance to the handle. Even when the deadbolt holes line up, a smaller smart lock can mean more cosmetic work.
Check these before you buy
Before ordering, verify the exact model, the hub that is included and the door-preparation diagram.
Test a backup entry plan, whether a physical key or something else. Network outages and depleted lock batteries are different failures.
Make sure every household phone, hub and app supports the entry feature you plan to use.
What this page can’t tell you
This page compares features and installation. It is not a destructive security test.
Compatible hubs, software and devices are what remote and wallet features depend on.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the smart locks we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
01
How many fit
12 of the 25 models checked meet every need here: “Hand a code to family and guests”, “Run it remotely without needing a hub”, “Pair it with Alexa”, and “Pair it with Google Home”.
12 models fit, out of 25 checked
Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
25 models
Sources
4 covering these models
Product data updated
How we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “Hand a code to family and guests”, “Run it remotely without needing a hub”, “Pair it with Alexa”, and “Pair it with Google Home”. A need with no documented match is not counted.
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation