The catch
Casio PX-870
The cabinet alone is 34.3 kg, before packaging or delivery access come into it.
Side by side
For phone music and wireless MIDI with no adapter to buy separately, the AP-S200 is the choice. When continuously detected damper response is the stronger priority, go with the PX-870.
Before you buy
Both are listed at 1393 mm wide and 299 mm deep. If that footprint already fits your room, switching between the models needs no more listed floor depth. The keyboard mechanisms differ, and they still deserve a trial. Equal dimensions do not mean equal key feel.
Where this comes from
Listed width: PX-870 1393 mm, AP-S200 1393 mm. Depth before music rest: PX-870 299 mm, AP-S200 299 mm. Keyboard mechanism: PX-870 Tri-sensor Scaled Hammer II, AP-S200 Smart Scaled Hammer. This is a conditional workflow inference drawn from these documented inputs. There is no matched performance measurement.
The catch
The cabinet alone is 34.3 kg, before packaging or delivery access come into it.
The catch
The damper has two levels plus off, which is not the continuous detection the PX-870 offers.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
Casio PX-870 vs Casio AP-S200, compared on keyboard mechanism, damper response and included Bluetooth audio reception, plus the practice routines that decide the better choice.
Both of these Casio consoles list the same width and depth and record audio to USB memory. Included wireless connectivity is what the AP-S200 adds, whereas the PX-870 documents continuous damper detection.
Which one fits
Both are listed at 1393 mm wide and 299 mm deep. If that footprint already fits your room, switching between the models needs no more listed floor depth. The keyboard mechanisms differ, and they still deserve a trial. Equal dimensions do not mean equal key feel.
The WU-BT10 for Bluetooth audio and MIDI comes with the AP-S200. Among the PX-870's listed connections, there is no comparable built-in or included wireless route. If your phone provides backing tracks and a note-responsive app, the AP-S200 handles both tasks through its supplied adapter.
Half-damper support is advertised on both, but the PX-870 documents continuous recognition and the AP-S200 specifies two levels plus off. If you are working on gradual pedal changes, treat this as a meaningful control difference and try the response. The half-pedal label they share would otherwise hide it.
It comes with both. Decide on pedal response, connectivity and complete price, and don't treat recording as a feature either one has to itself.
In practice
Both are listed at 1393 mm wide and 299 mm deep. If that footprint already fits your room, switching between the models needs no more listed floor depth. The keyboard mechanisms differ, and they still deserve a trial. Equal dimensions do not mean equal key feel.
Listed width: PX-870 1393 mm, AP-S200 1393 mm. Depth before music rest: PX-870 299 mm, AP-S200 299 mm. Keyboard mechanism: PX-870 Tri-sensor Scaled Hammer II, AP-S200 Smart Scaled Hammer. This is a conditional workflow inference drawn from these documented inputs. There is no matched performance measurement.
The WU-BT10 for Bluetooth audio and MIDI comes with the AP-S200. Among the PX-870's listed connections, there is no comparable built-in or included wireless route. If your phone provides backing tracks and a note-responsive app, the AP-S200 handles both tasks through its supplied adapter.
Included Bluetooth audio reception: PX-870 No, AP-S200 Yes. Included Bluetooth MIDI: PX-870 No, AP-S200 Yes. This is a conditional workflow inference drawn from these documented inputs. There is no matched performance measurement.
Half-damper support is advertised on both, but the PX-870 documents continuous recognition and the AP-S200 specifies two levels plus off. If you are working on gradual pedal changes, treat this as a meaningful control difference and try the response. The half-pedal label they share would otherwise hide it.
Damper response: PX-870 Continuous, AP-S200 Two levels plus off. Gradual damper support: PX-870 Yes, AP-S200 Yes. This is a conditional workflow inference drawn from these documented inputs. There is no matched performance measurement.

Casio, PX-870
On top of a shallow cabinet with three pedals and two headphone connections, the PX-870 records audio to a USB flash drive. It lists the same depth as the PX-770, so stepping up does not mean a deeper piano body.

Casio, AP-S200
Three pedals, a two-track recorder and the Bluetooth audio and MIDI adapter all come with the AP-S200. A cabinet depth of 299 mm keeps its permanent footprint manageable in a shared room.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Casio PX-870 | Casio AP-S200 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keyboard mechanism | Tri-sensor Scaled Hammer II | Smart Scaled Hammer | Try out the documented mechanism before taking its name as a guarantee about feel or mechanical noise. |
| Damper response | Continuous | Two levels plus off | Different response resolutions can sit behind the term half-pedal support, and they deserve a direct trial. |
| Included Bluetooth audio reception | No | Yes | What audio reception brings in is backing music from a supported device. It does not send sound to wireless headphones. |
| Included Bluetooth MIDI | No | Yes | For a compatible note-responsive app, MIDI support is what counts. An audio-only Bluetooth connection will not do. |
| Depth before music rest | 299 mm | 299 mm | The music rest, cable route and comfortable playing clearance are all left out of bare depth. |
| Audio recording to USB memory | Yes | Yes | Live USB audio to a computer is not the same workflow as saving an audio file to a drive. |
Trade-offs
Change of plan
Go with Casio PX-870. Half-damper support is advertised on both, but the PX-870 documents continuous recognition and the AP-S200 specifies two levels plus off. If you are working on gradual pedal changes, treat this as a meaningful control difference and try the response. The half-pedal label they share would otherwise hide it.
Go with Casio AP-S200. The WU-BT10 for Bluetooth audio and MIDI comes with the AP-S200. Among the PX-870's listed connections, there is no comparable built-in or included wireless route. If your phone provides backing tracks and a note-responsive app, the AP-S200 handles both tasks through its supplied adapter.
Neither model fits. Manufacturer records contain no matched test for those outcomes. Try the instruments under the conditions you intend to play in.
Decision guide
Both are listed at 1393 mm wide and 299 mm deep. If that footprint already fits your room, switching between the models needs no more listed floor depth. The keyboard mechanisms differ, and they still deserve a trial. Equal dimensions do not mean equal key feel.
The WU-BT10 for Bluetooth audio and MIDI comes with the AP-S200. Among the PX-870's listed connections, there is no comparable built-in or included wireless route. If your phone provides backing tracks and a note-responsive app, the AP-S200 handles both tasks through its supplied adapter.
Half-damper support is advertised on both, but the PX-870 documents continuous recognition and the AP-S200 specifies two levels plus off. If you are working on gradual pedal changes, treat this as a meaningful control difference and try the response. The half-pedal label they share would otherwise hide it.
By the numbers
What we found across the digital pianos we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Casio PX-870 |
|
| |
| Casio AP-S200 |
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Your lessons right now include gradual pedal control
See price & reviews on Amazon
You work with phone music and a compatible wireless MIDI app
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money