The catch
Kawai ES920
Recording audio to a USB flash drive does not make the piano a live USB audio interface.
Side by side
For 16-track arranging and direct USB audio, take the P-525. The ES920 is the pick for a lighter published body, two-part recording and USB audio-file capture.
Before you buy
Before rests, the ES920 is 375 mm deep and the P-525 is 376 mm, only 1 mm apart. Kawai lists 17 kg without its rest, and Yamaha lists 22 kg for the instrument. Confirm the basis of the complete setup, but do not assume these near-identical depths mean an equally manageable carry.
Where this comes from
Depth before the music rest: ES920 375 mm, P-525 376 mm. Listed instrument weight: ES920 17 kg (without music rest), P-525 22 kg. For the ES920 the weight is given without the music rest, while for the P-525 the weight basis was not established in the checked record. Any workflow reading here is conditional and drawn from these documented figures. There is no matched performance measurement behind it.
The catch
Recording audio to a USB flash drive does not make the piano a live USB audio interface.
The catch
Expect to pay more for a full three-pedal setup and the matching stand.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
Kawai ES920 vs Yamaha P-525, compared on listed instrument weight, internal recorder tracks and live USB audio interface, along with the practice routines that decide the better choice.
Two headphone connections, dedicated outputs and included half-pedals come with both of these upper-range portable pianos. Putting them on a shortlist makes sense for a player who wants a serious home instrument without a fixed cabinet.
Which one fits
Before rests, the ES920 is 375 mm deep and the P-525 is 376 mm, only 1 mm apart. Kawai lists 17 kg without its rest, and Yamaha lists 22 kg for the instrument. Confirm the basis of the complete setup, but do not assume these near-identical depths mean an equally manageable carry.
Saving audio to USB memory works on both. The P-525 also sends live USB audio into compatible software, but the ES920's computer connection is MIDI. If you are building a computer session, Yamaha's direct route helps. A self-contained audio-file take is possible on either piano.
Two recorder parts on the ES920 are enough for a hand-by-hand exercise. The P-525 offers 16 tracks, which suit more developed arrangements. If all you do is record one hand and practice the other, the extra tracks will not make a better lesson on their own. Let the action trial and the complete cost decide instead.
A suitable pedal comes with both. Compare the full stand setup and the recording workflow, since the pedal is not a benefit either one has to itself.
In practice
Before rests, the ES920 is 375 mm deep and the P-525 is 376 mm, only 1 mm apart. Kawai lists 17 kg without its rest, and Yamaha lists 22 kg for the instrument. Confirm the basis of the complete setup, but do not assume these near-identical depths mean an equally manageable carry.
Depth before the music rest: ES920 375 mm, P-525 376 mm. Listed instrument weight: ES920 17 kg (without music rest), P-525 22 kg. For the ES920 the weight is given without the music rest, while for the P-525 the weight basis was not established in the checked record. Any workflow reading here is conditional and drawn from these documented figures. There is no matched performance measurement behind it.
Saving audio to USB memory works on both. The P-525 also sends live USB audio into compatible software, but the ES920's computer connection is MIDI. If you are building a computer session, Yamaha's direct route helps. A self-contained audio-file take is possible on either piano.
Live USB audio interface: ES920 No, P-525 Yes. Audio recording to USB memory: ES920 Yes, P-525 Yes. USB MIDI: ES920 Yes, P-525 Yes. The workflow conclusion drawn from these documented inputs is conditional, and no matched performance measurement backs it.
Two recorder parts on the ES920 are enough for a hand-by-hand exercise. The P-525 offers 16 tracks, which suit more developed arrangements. If all you do is record one hand and practice the other, the extra tracks will not make a better lesson on their own. Let the action trial and the complete cost decide instead.
Internal recorder tracks: ES920 has 2, P-525 has 16. Keyboard mechanism: ES920 Responsive Hammer III, P-525 GrandTouch-S. This is a conditional workflow inference from documented inputs, with no matched performance measurement.

Kawai, ES920
Within the same listed footprint as the ES520, the ES920 packs a two-part recorder, USB audio-file recording and the included half-pedal. Its 17 kg body is heavier to carry.

Yamaha, P-525
If you build recordings at home as well as practice, the 16-track recorder, USB audio and included FC3A pedal fit the job. At 48 lb 8 oz, the body needs a thought-out plan for moving it.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Kawai ES920 | Yamaha P-525 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listed instrument weight | 17 kg (without music rest) | 22 kg | Work out the load you will be moving from the stated measurement basis, and then add the stand, case and accessories. |
| Internal recorder tracks | 2 | 16 | A large number by itself counts for less than track allocation and independent overdubbing. |
| Live USB audio interface | No | Yes | Whether compatible software can take the internal piano sound directly over USB depends on this. |
| Audio recording to USB memory | Yes | Yes | Live USB audio to a computer is not the same workflow as saving an audio file to a drive. |
| Depth before music rest | 375 mm | 376 mm | The music rest, cable route and comfortable playing clearance are all left out of bare depth. |
| Keyboard mechanism | Responsive Hammer III | GrandTouch-S | Try out the documented mechanism before taking its name as a guarantee about feel or mechanical noise. |
Trade-offs
Change of plan
Go with Kawai ES920. Before rests, the ES920 is 375 mm deep and the P-525 is 376 mm, only 1 mm apart. Kawai lists 17 kg without its rest, and Yamaha lists 22 kg for the instrument. Confirm the basis of the complete setup, but do not assume these near-identical depths mean an equally manageable carry.
Go with Yamaha P-525. Saving audio to USB memory works on both. The P-525 also sends live USB audio into compatible software, but the ES920's computer connection is MIDI. If you are building a computer session, Yamaha's direct route helps. A self-contained audio-file take is possible on either piano.
Neither model fits. Manufacturer records contain no matched test for those outcomes. Try the instruments under the conditions you intend to play in.
Decision guide
Before rests, the ES920 is 375 mm deep and the P-525 is 376 mm, only 1 mm apart. Kawai lists 17 kg without its rest, and Yamaha lists 22 kg for the instrument. Confirm the basis of the complete setup, but do not assume these near-identical depths mean an equally manageable carry.
Saving audio to USB memory works on both. The P-525 also sends live USB audio into compatible software, but the ES920's computer connection is MIDI. If you are building a computer session, Yamaha's direct route helps. A self-contained audio-file take is possible on either piano.
Two recorder parts on the ES920 are enough for a hand-by-hand exercise. The P-525 offers 16 tracks, which suit more developed arrangements. If all you do is record one hand and practice the other, the extra tracks will not make a better lesson on their own. Let the action trial and the complete cost decide instead.
By the numbers
What we found across the digital pianos we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kawai ES920 |
|
| |
| Yamaha P-525 |
|
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

The piano has to be moved around the home regularly
See price & reviews on Amazon
You capture the internal piano sound over USB straight into computer software
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money