Side by side

QNAP TS-264 vs Synology DS425+ Compared: QNAP leaves a route for a network card, while Synology adds HDD bays

Quick verdict

If two hard drives are enough and you want more installed RAM or a PCIe network-upgrade route, the TS-264-8G is the fit. For a larger internal hard-drive array and DSM backups, go with the DS425+. Two NVMe slots come on both, so the main decision is storage growth against hardware flexibility around a smaller drive pair.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

In the same drive-size example, four bays can give 24 TB more

Using equal compatible 12 TB drives, a two-drive mirror in QNAP gives 12 TB before overhead, while a four-drive RAID 5 array in DS425+ gives 36 TB. The extra 24 TB comes from buying two more drives and using a different RAID layout, and not from the enclosure alone.

Where this comes from

RAID 1 on QNAP gives 12 TB. RAID 5 on Synology gives (4 - 1) × 12 = 36 TB. 36 - 12 = 24 TB of additional nominal usable capacity.

The catch

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

Hard-drive growth is limited by having two SATA bays.

The catch

Synology DiskStation DS425+

Supplied RAM is just 2 GB, and the official maximum is 6 GB.

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

Why pick it
  • Start with 8 GB RAM in place and two hard drives
  • Leave a compatible PCIe route open for a networking upgrade
The catch
Hard-drive growth is limited by having two SATA bays.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Synology DiskStation DS425+

Synology DiskStation DS425+

Why pick it
  • Scale up to three or four internal hard drives
  • Combine the DSM workflow with RAID 6 on four drives
The catch
Supplied RAM is just 2 GB, and the official maximum is 6 GB.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

A diskless NAS purchase, QNAP TS-264 vs Synology DS425+, weighed on storage growth, home apps, protected hard-drive capacity, RAM and networking.

If two hard drives are enough and you want more installed RAM or a PCIe network-upgrade route, the TS-264-8G is the fit. For a larger internal hard-drive array and DSM backups, go with the DS425+. Two NVMe slots come on both, so the main decision is storage growth against hardware flexibility around a smaller drive pair.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • My long-term storage need is covered by two mirrored hard drives

    That starting layout works on both, and QNAP comes with more memory.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Good
    Synology DiskStation DS425+
    Good
  • I plan on a single internal array of four hard drives

    There are four SATA bays on DS425+.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Not suitable
    Synology DiskStation DS425+
    Better fit
  • The applications I run call for 8 GB of RAM

    That memory comes with the QNAP 8G model, whereas Synology officially supports up to 6 GB.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Good
    Synology DiskStation DS425+
    Not suitable
  • I want two NVMe positions in addition to the hard drives

    Two slots are on each, and each platform has its own drive and storage-mode requirements.

    QNAP TS-264-8G-US
    Good
    Synology DiskStation DS425+
    Good

In practice

Differences you will notice

In the same drive-size example, four bays can give 24 TB more

Using equal compatible 12 TB drives, a two-drive mirror in QNAP gives 12 TB before overhead, while a four-drive RAID 5 array in DS425+ gives 36 TB. The extra 24 TB comes from buying two more drives and using a different RAID layout, and not from the enclosure alone.

How we worked this out

RAID 1 on QNAP gives 12 TB. RAID 5 on Synology gives (4 - 1) × 12 = 36 TB. 36 - 12 = 24 TB of additional nominal usable capacity.

Synology's official RAM ceiling sits below where the smaller chassis starts

The selected TS-264-8G arrives with 8 GB, but DS425+ officially supports up to 6 GB, even after expansion. If your chosen applications require 8 GB, the extra hard-drive bays on Synology do not fix that memory requirement.

How we worked this out

QNAP comes with 8 GB and Synology tops out at 6 GB. 8 - 6 = 2 GB over the official Synology ceiling.

The right hard-drive layout is needed for two-drive fault tolerance

In Synology RAID 6, four equal 12 TB drives give 24 TB before overhead and tolerate two drive failures, while a two-drive mirror in QNAP tolerates one. QNAP does not become a four-hard-drive chassis because of two NVMe slots.

How we worked this out

For RAID 6, (4 - 2) × 12 = 24 TB, with two-drive fault tolerance. Two-drive RAID 1 keeps the capacity of one drive and tolerates one drive failure.

Option A
QNAP TS-264-8G-US

QNAP, TS-264-8G-US

QNAP TS-264-8G-US

This two-bay NAS has two built-in NVMe slots, dual 2.5GbE and a PCIe slot that takes supported SSD or network expansion. The current 8G configuration selected here comes with 8 GB RAM.

Best for
Start with 8 GB RAM in place and two hard drives

Facts we checked

  • SATA drive bays: 2
  • NVMe slots: 2
  • Installed memory: 8 GB
  • Official maximum memory: 16 GB on the current SODIMM revision
Option B
Synology DiskStation DS425+

Synology, DS425+

Synology DiskStation DS425+

A 4-bay chassis whose fastest documented network path is 2.5 Gbps.

Best for
Scale up to three or four internal hard drives

Facts we checked

  • SATA drive bays: 4
  • NVMe slots: 2
  • Installed memory: 2 GB
  • Official maximum memory: 6 GB

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where QNAP TS-264-8G-US and Synology DiskStation DS425+ differ
SpecQNAP TS-264-8G-USSynology DiskStation DS425+In practice
SATA drive bays24A larger internal hard-drive array is supported by Synology.
NVMe slots22For a two-NVMe plan, neither one leads on slot count.
Installed memory8 GB2 GBDespite its smaller hard-drive chassis, QNAP includes more RAM.
Official maximum memory16 GB on the current SODIMM revision6 GBBefore upgrading, confirm the QNAP revision and supported modules.
Built-in EthernetTwo 2.5GbEOne 2.5GbE and one 1GbEA single 2.5GbE client path works on both.
PCIe network expansionOne slot with compatible card optionsNo internal PCIe card slotSupported faster networking can be added to QNAP, at extra cost.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With QNAP TS-264-8G-US

  • Using its single PCIe slot, optional network expansion also costs extra.

With Synology DiskStation DS425+

  • No upgrade path for an internal PCIe card.

Change of plan

When the answer changes

I am moving up to three or four internal hard drives next

Go with Synology DiskStation DS425+. The additional SATA positions are on DS425+.

Two hard drives are enough and 8 GB RAM is needed right away

Go with QNAP TS-264-8G-US. That memory comes with the selected QNAP 8G model.

I want four SATA bays together with officially supported RAM above 6 GB

Neither model fits. Another model is needed for this combination.

Decision guide

How to decide

01

Keep the storage plan and the app plan apart

Four bays do not automatically make a NAS the more capable application server. The DS425+ has more SATA positions, whereas the TS-264-8G has more supplied memory and a PCIe slot. Estimate protected storage capacity first, and only then check the CPU and memory requirements of the applications you plan to run.

02

Count the drives in your four-bay budget

Four purchased drives are assumed in the larger RAID examples. Starting a four-bay enclosure with only two drives does not give you four-drive RAID 5 or RAID 6 capacity right away. Before changing an array later, check the supported migration path and keep a verified backup.

03

Having NVMe slots is not unrestricted SSD support

Two M.2 positions come on both. Synology permits M.2 storage pools under its verified SSD requirements, and QNAP likewise calls for checking drive compatibility and the chosen storage mode. A matching physical drive size does not show that an SSD will work as planned on both systems.

Check these before you buy

  • Compare the full cost of the diskless unit plus drives for your intended RAID layout.
  • Check application memory needs and the QNAP hardware revision.
  • Ahead of a storage migration, copy important files to a separate backup destination.

What this page can’t tell you

  • Storage figures assume compatible drives of equal capacity and decimal TB, counted before formatting, system space and metadata. RAID covers the drive failures it is specified for, but it does not replace a separate backup.
  • Treat network figures as link rates. They are not measured file-transfer speeds. For the exact model you buy, check software support, memory revision, drive compatibility and the rest of the network.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the NAS devices we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
2 models
Sources
2 covering these models
Product data updated
The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
QNAP TS-264-8G-US
  • Start with 8 GB RAM in place and two hard drives
  • Leave a compatible PCIe route open for a networking upgrade
  • SATA drive bays: 2
  • NVMe slots: 2
  • Installed memory: 8 GB
  • Official maximum memory: 16 GB on the current SODIMM revision
  • Built-in Ethernet: Two 2.5GbE
  • PCIe network expansion: One slot with compatible card options
Synology DiskStation DS425+
  • Scale up to three or four internal hard drives
  • Combine the DSM workflow with RAID 6 on four drives
  • SATA drive bays: 4
  • NVMe slots: 2
  • Installed memory: 2 GB
  • Official maximum memory: 6 GB
  • Built-in Ethernet: One 2.5GbE and one 1GbE
  • PCIe network expansion: No internal PCIe card slot

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money