The catch
INNO Ridge Cargo Box
For a family's packing list, eight cubic feet is too little.
Side by side
INNO BRA240BK vs Thule Pulse 2 M compared: INNO makes short-roof lifting lighter, and Thule adds six cubic feet and dual access
Quick verdict
INNO Ridge suits a very short roof and brings a 20-pound shell. Pulse 2 M is the pick if six more cubic feet and access from both sides matter to you.
Before you buy
Why, and what it costs you
Where these two really part ways
INNO Ridge Cargo Box is the better match for “Get under a low garage” and “Space for a bike rack is needed”. Thule Pulse 2 M is the better match for “Rear hatch stays clear” and “Load from both sides”.
Where this comes from
This lines up the current strong and useful fit ratings for the exact products. It does not roll them into one overall score.
The catch
Thule Pulse 2 M
Ordinary adult skis longer than 155 cm will not fit.
INNO Ridge Cargo Box
- Why pick it
- Space for a bike rack is needed
- Your garage is low
- The catch
- For a family's packing list, eight cubic feet is too little.
Thule Pulse 2 M
- Why pick it
- Rear hatch needs to stay clear
- Access from both sides
- The catch
- Ordinary adult skis longer than 155 cm will not fit.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
What this page compares
INNO BRA240BK and Thule Pulse 2 M, set side by side on volume, gear length, vehicle measurements, loading and hardware.
This one comes down to volume and gear length and vehicle measurements first, then to the limits of your own setup.
Which one fits
Pick the situations that sound like you
Rear hatch stays clear
It passes only if the measured front-crossbar-to-hatch distance is greater than the manufacturer's published clearance requirement.
- INNO Ridge Cargo Box
- Depends
- Thule Pulse 2 M
- Better fit
Space for a bike rack is needed
INNO Ridge Cargo Box lists “Single-side or rear opening” for loading and hardware, while Thule Pulse 2 M lists “Opens from either side”. Confirm the exact model and what comes in the box. This row covers the selected offer only. Other versions sold under the same family name may differ.
- INNO Ridge Cargo Box
- Better fit
- Thule Pulse 2 M
- Depends
Load from both sides
Dual-side opening is explicitly listed by the manufacturer.
- INNO Ridge Cargo Box
- Depends
- Thule Pulse 2 M
- Better fit
You want tool-free mounting
It comes with integrated tool-free clamps or manufacturer tool-free hardware.
- INNO Ridge Cargo Box
- Depends
- Thule Pulse 2 M
- Better fit
Your factory crossbars are wide
The published mount has to accept the entered bar width and profile, and universal wording alone does not settle that.
- INNO Ridge Cargo Box
- Depends
- Thule Pulse 2 M
- Better fit
Switch it between two cars
It has tool-free mounting, and each vehicle passes fit and load checks separately.
- INNO Ridge Cargo Box
- Good
- Thule Pulse 2 M
- Better fit
In practice
Differences you will notice
Where these two really part ways
INNO Ridge Cargo Box is the better match for “Get under a low garage” and “Space for a bike rack is needed”. Thule Pulse 2 M is the better match for “Rear hatch stays clear” and “Load from both sides”.
How we worked this out
This lines up the current strong and useful fit ratings for the exact products. It does not roll them into one overall score.
One of them covers more of your list
Thule Pulse 2 M meets 3 of the 3 needs this comparison is built around. INNO Ridge Cargo Box meets 2 and misses “Rear hatch stays clear”.
How we worked this out
The count uses the current strong and useful fit ratings for these two products. Each need counts once, with no made-up score added on top.
How many models fit “Rear hatch stays clear”
9 of the 26 roof cargo boxes checked fit this need. Thule Pulse 2 M makes the cut. INNO Ridge Cargo Box does not.
How we worked this out
The count filters every model in the current category for a strong or useful fit on this single need.
Models that handle “Your roof-load limit is light” and “Rear hatch stays clear”
3 of the 26 roof cargo boxes checked handle both “Your roof-load limit is light” and “Rear hatch stays clear”. Thule Pulse 2 M makes the cut. INNO Ridge Cargo Box does not.
How we worked this out
You can reproduce the count by filtering the current category for models with a strong or useful fit on both needs.
Option A
INNO, BRA240BK
INNO Ridge Cargo Box
It holds 8 cubic feet and opens on the passenger side.
- Best for
- suit a shorter roof and stay under a light roof-load limit
Facts we checked
- Capacity is 8 cubic feet.
- It opens on the passenger side.
- Published exterior dimensions are 55.1 x 27.6 x 13.4 inches.
Option B
Thule, Pulse 2 M
Thule Pulse 2 M
This box offers 14 cubic feet, and gear can be up to 155 centimeters long.
- Best for
- fit a shorter roof and leave the rear hatch free
Facts we checked
- Capacity is 14 cubic feet.
- Gear up to 155 centimeters long fits.
- Dualside access is how it opens.
- Published exterior dimensions are 68.9 x 32.1 x 16.6 inches.
Spec by spec
Where they really differ
| Spec | INNO Ridge Cargo Box | Thule Pulse 2 M | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume and gear length | 8 cu ft. Check the internal gear length before carrying skis | 14 cu ft. Gear up to 155 cm | Consider this a firm ceiling on the size or amount that fits in a single run. Shape can count as much as the headline number does. |
| Vehicle measurements | Check the maker vehicle-fit guide for crossbar spacing | Check the maker vehicle-fit guide for crossbar spacing. 44.8125 in hatch clearance | Fit can be a hard limit, so measure your space and mounting points before anything else. |
| Loading and hardware | Single-side or rear opening | Opens from either side | Confirm the exact model and what comes in the box. This row covers the selected offer only. Other versions sold under the same family name may differ. |
Trade-offs
What each pick costs you
With INNO Ridge Cargo Box
- Integrated clamps with dual-side access are handier than the passenger-side-only opening and U-bolt hardware here.
With Thule Pulse 2 M
- Fourteen cubic feet goes fast once four travelers pack their luggage.
Decision guide
How to decide
Where they differ
Ridge takes up 13.8 inches less length and weighs 11 pounds less.
Why the numbers matter
Ridge offers eight cubic feet against 14 cubic feet in Pulse 2 M.
What this page can’t tell you
- Vehicle compatibility cannot be certified by this screen.
- A published volume figure cannot promise that a given suitcase layout will fit.
- Roof limits depend on the vehicle configuration.
By the numbers
What the data shows
What we found across the roof cargo boxes we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
How many fit
Only 3 of the 26 models checked meet every need here: “Your roof is on the short side”, “Your roof-load limit is light”, and “Rear hatch stays clear”.
3 models fit, out of 26 checkedThe gap in numbers
Thule Pulse 2 M lists 14 cu ft for listed cargo volume, 75% more than the 8 cu ft on INNO Ridge Cargo Box.
- INNO Ridge Cargo Box
- 8 cu ft
- Thule Pulse 2 M
- 14 cu ft
- Models with this figure
- 20 of 26
Show the facts and the math
How we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “Your roof is on the short side”, “Your roof-load limit is light”, and “Rear hatch stays clear”. A need with no documented match is not counted.
How we calculatedFigures are the published exterior-category volume. Shape, mounting hardware and long gear can leave less room to pack. For context, 20 of 26 models publish comparable figures.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| INNO Ridge Cargo Box |
|
| |
| Thule Pulse 2 M |
|
|
Ready to buy
See today’s price and what owners say
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.
INNO Ridge Cargo Box
Space for a bike rack is needed
See price & reviews on AmazonThule Pulse 2 M
Rear hatch needs to stay clear
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money