Side by side

Thule Pulse 2 M vs Force 3 M: SlideLock costs Force six extra pounds, and both stop at 155 cm skis

Quick verdict

Pulse 2 M is the lighter box for occasional use. Pick Force 3 M for SlideLock if that handling detail matters more to you than the six-pound increase. Both stop at 155 cm skis.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

Six pounds saved counts for a lot here

Force 3 M comes in at 37 pounds, against 31 for Pulse 2 M.

Where this comes from

37 - 31 = 6 pounds, and 6 / 37 × 100 = 16.2% less empty weight.

The catch

Thule Pulse 2 M

Ordinary adult skis longer than 155 cm will not fit.

The catch

Thule Force 3 M

Most adult skis are longer than its 155 cm limit.

Thule Pulse 2 M

Thule Pulse 2 M

Why pick it
  • The carrier comes off after the occasional holiday
  • Roof-load allowance on your small car is limited
The catch
Ordinary adult skis longer than 155 cm will not fit.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Thule Force 3 M

Thule Force 3 M

Why pick it
  • The Force SlideLock mechanism appeals to you
  • Your bags are unaffected by a slight gap in interior width
The catch
Most adult skis are longer than its 155 cm limit.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

Pulse 2 M and Force 3 M share a 14-cubic-foot capacity. See how they differ in handling weight, overhead height, usable interior and locking.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • The carrier comes off after the occasional holiday

    Force 3 M weighs 37 pounds, while Pulse 2 M weighs 31 pounds.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Better fit
    Thule Force 3 M
    Good
  • You need the Force SlideLock mechanism

    Pulse uses a central locking system, whereas SlideLock comes with Force.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Not suitable
    Thule Force 3 M
    Better fit
  • Roof-load allowance on your small car is limited

    Before cargo, Pulse uses six fewer pounds of the roof-load allowance. The total still has to stay within every vehicle and rack limit.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Better fit
    Thule Force 3 M
    Good
  • Your skis run past 155 cm but not past 175 cm

    Neither M size goes past 155 cm. Pulse 2 L stretches the allowance to 175 cm.

    Thule Pulse 2 M
    Not suitable
    Thule Force 3 M
    Not suitable

In practice

Differences you will notice

Six pounds saved counts for a lot here

Force 3 M comes in at 37 pounds, against 31 for Pulse 2 M.

How we worked this out

37 - 31 = 6 pounds, and 6 / 37 × 100 = 16.2% less empty weight.

A lower shell can still have a tall interior

Outside, Pulse is 0.8 inches lower, and its published internal height is 0.2 inches more.

How we worked this out

Outside: 17.4 - 16.6 = 0.8 inches. Inside: 15.3 - 15.1 = 0.2 inches.

Trim level does not raise the ski limit

The 155 cm listed for both M sizes leaves a 165 cm ski ten centimeters out.

How we worked this out

165 - 155 = 10 cm over both published ski limits.

Option A
Thule Pulse 2 M

Thule, Pulse 2 M

Thule Pulse 2 M

This box offers 14 cubic feet, and gear can be up to 155 centimeters long.

Best for
fit a shorter roof and leave the rear hatch free

Facts we checked

  • Capacity is 14 cubic feet.
  • Gear up to 155 centimeters long fits.
  • Dualside access is how it opens.
  • Published exterior dimensions are 68.9 x 32.1 x 16.6 inches.
Option B
Thule Force 3 M

Thule, Force 3 M

Thule Force 3 M

It holds 14 cubic feet, and the longest gear it accepts is 155 centimeters.

Best for
suit a shorter roof and stay clear of the rear hatch

Facts we checked

  • Capacity is 14 cubic feet.
  • Gear up to 155 centimeters long fits.
  • Dualside access is how it opens.
  • Its published exterior size is 69 x 32 x 17.4 inches.

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where Thule Pulse 2 M and Thule Force 3 M differ
SpecThule Pulse 2 MThule Force 3 MIn practice
Empty box weight31 lb37 lbBefore you allocate cargo, take the shell and rack off the vehicle roof limit.
Exterior length68.9 in69 inLook at where the shell sits on the roof, how the hatch moves and where it is stored.
Exterior width32.1 in32 inIt takes up crossbar room that could otherwise go to a bike carrier.
Exterior height16.6 in17.4 inOverall shell height is useful for comparing bulk and says nothing certain about installed garage clearance.
Internal height15.3 in15.1 inYour tallest suitcase or boots have to fit under the curved lid with no need to force it closed.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With Thule Pulse 2 M

  • Fourteen cubic feet goes fast once four travelers pack their luggage.

With Thule Force 3 M

  • With its tall 17.4-inch profile, it adds more garage height than low-profile boxes do.

Change of plan

When the answer changes

Your skis fall between 156 and 175 cm

Neither model fits. Pulse 2 L raises the documented ski allowance to 175 cm and lifts volume to 16 cubic feet.

Decision guide

How to decide

01

Six pounds saved counts for a lot here

Compact carriers tend to be mounted and removed more often than a permanent road-trip setup. The lighter shell helps at removal time, and it frees up six more pounds for contents while the vehicle limit stays the same.

02

A lower shell can still have a tall interior

These figures show why outside size cannot stand in for interior fit. Both interiors are curved, so a bag near the published limit needs a real check. Choose the shell to suit your luggage. A taller exterior alone is not a reason.

03

Trim level does not raise the ski limit

Should this box carry adult skis, check their lengths before you compare lock systems. Plenty of common alpine skis are longer than the M limit. A small shell that suits the car perfectly can still be the wrong shape for the only gear you plan to carry.

Check these before you buy

  • Get the dimensions of your longest and tallest cargo before settling on a shell.
  • Look up the fit guide for your exact vehicle and crossbars, then add up the weight of the rack, empty box and luggage.

What this page can’t tell you

  • Wind noise, fuel use and the way a given bag packs around the mounting hardware are things cargo dimensions and manufacturer load ratings cannot predict.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the roof cargo boxes we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

How many fit

18 of the 26 models checked meet every need here: “Haul camping gear” and “Load from both sides”.

18 models fit, out of 26 checked
Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
26 models
Sources
2 covering these models
Product data updated

How we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “Haul camping gear” and “Load from both sides”. A need with no documented match is not counted.

The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
Thule Pulse 2 M
  • Haul camping gear
  • Load from both sides
  • Capacity is 14 cubic feet.
  • Gear up to 155 centimeters long fits.
  • Dualside access is how it opens.
Thule Force 3 M
  • Haul camping gear
  • Load from both sides
  • Capacity is 14 cubic feet.
  • Gear up to 155 centimeters long fits.
  • Dualside access is how it opens.

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money