Side by side

Thule Motion 3 L vs Force 3 L: Motion fits 176–180 cm skis, and Force takes up less roof width

Quick verdict

Skis between 176 and 180 cm, or a slightly taller interior, favor Motion 3 L. Force 3 L is the one when its narrower shell fits the roof better and 175 cm skis cover your needs.

Before you buy

Why, and what it costs you

A few centimeters of ski length can settle the purchase

Five centimeters more ski length fit on Motion.

Where this comes from

180 - 175 = 5 cm, and a 178 cm ski goes 3 cm past Force guidance.

The catch

Thule Motion 3 L

Skis of 200 cm do not fit.

The catch

Thule Force 3 L

Skis from 180 to 200 cm are too long for it.

Thule Motion 3 L

Thule Motion 3 L

Why pick it
  • Your skis go a bit past 175 cm
  • More interior height is needed for your rigid luggage
The catch
Skis of 200 cm do not fit.
See price & reviews on Amazon
Thule Force 3 L

Thule Force 3 L

Why pick it
  • You need a slimmer outer shell
  • None of your skis exceeds 175 cm
The catch
Skis from 180 to 200 cm are too long for it.
See price & reviews on Amazon

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money

Comparison updated , Product data updated , Amazon.com / United States

What this page compares

Motion 3 L and Force 3 L both have 16-cubic-foot volume. See how they differ in ski limits, usable height, roof width and weight.

Which one fits

Pick the situations that sound like you

  • Your skis run past 175 cm but not past 180 cm

    Force stops at 175 cm, while Motion lists 180 cm.

    Thule Motion 3 L
    Better fit
    Thule Force 3 L
    Not suitable
  • You need a slimmer outer shell

    Outside, Force is narrower by 0.9 inch. Check the combined carrier and crossbar space.

    Thule Motion 3 L
    Depends
    Thule Force 3 L
    Better fit
  • More interior height is needed for your rigid luggage

    Force has 14.4 inches of internal height, against 15 inches listed for Motion.

    Thule Motion 3 L
    Better fit
    Thule Force 3 L
    Depends
  • Your skis fit 175 cm, and frequent lifting is what matters most

    At 35.3 pounds, Pulse 2 L offers the same 16-cubic-foot volume and is lighter than both compared models.

    Thule Motion 3 L
    Caution
    Thule Force 3 L
    Caution

In practice

Differences you will notice

A few centimeters of ski length can settle the purchase

Five centimeters more ski length fit on Motion.

How we worked this out

180 - 175 = 5 cm, and a 178 cm ski goes 3 cm past Force guidance.

Motion offers more height, Force more floor length

Against 14.4 for Force, Motion lists 15 inches of internal height, while Force has 73.6 inches of internal length against 72.

How we worked this out

In Motion, 15 - 14.4 = 0.6 inches taller. In Force, 73.6 - 72 = 1.6 inches longer.

On weight, it is close to a tie

Force saves just 0.6 pounds, though it makes the exterior 0.9 inches narrower.

How we worked this out

Weight: 43.6 - 43 = 0.6 pounds. 34.2 - 33.3 = 0.9 inches.

Option A
Thule Motion 3 L

Thule, Motion 3 L Titan Glossy

Thule Motion 3 L

Its 16 cubic feet can take gear up to 180 centimeters long.

Best for
move skis with the seats left up while keeping the rear hatch clear

Facts we checked

  • Capacity is 16 cubic feet.
  • Gear up to 180 centimeters long fits inside.
  • Dualside access is how it opens.
  • Its published exterior size is 76.5 x 34.2 x 16.5 inches.
Option B
Thule Force 3 L

Thule, Force 3 L

Thule Force 3 L

It offers 16 cubic feet and fits gear up to 175 centimeters in length.

Best for
take skis along with the seats left up and suit a shorter roof

Facts we checked

  • Capacity is 16 cubic feet.
  • Gear up to 175 centimeters long fits.
  • Dualside access is how it opens.
  • Its published exterior size is 76.8 x 33.3 x 16.8 inches.

Spec by spec

Where they really differ

Where Thule Motion 3 L and Thule Force 3 L differ
SpecThule Motion 3 LThule Force 3 LIn practice
Maximum ski length180 cm175 cmAny ski longer than this documented limit calls for a different carrier.
Exterior length76.5 in76.8 inLook at where the shell sits on the roof, how the hatch moves and where it is stored.
Exterior width34.2 in33.3 inIt takes up crossbar room that could otherwise go to a bike carrier.
Empty box weight43.6 lb43 lbBefore you allocate cargo, take the shell and rack off the vehicle roof limit.
Internal height15 in14.4 inYour tallest suitcase or boots have to fit under the curved lid with no need to force it closed.

Trade-offs

What each pick costs you

With Thule Motion 3 L

  • For a trip with four people, 16 cubic feet leaves less slack than the XL or XXL does.

With Thule Force 3 L

  • At 16.8 inches above the crossbar, it is not built for low garages.

Change of plan

When the answer changes

Frequent lifting matters most to you, and your skis stay within 175 cm

Neither model fits. With a 35.3-pound empty weight, Pulse 2 L offers the same 16-cubic-foot volume.

Decision guide

How to decide

01

A few centimeters of ski length can settle the purchase

The advantage is a narrow one that applies to equipment near the boundary. It does not mean the Motion takes significantly longer Nordic skis. Measure the actual ski and bag, and leave space for how the bindings and poles sit inside.

02

Motion offers more height, Force more floor length

Build the choice around the least flexible item you are carrying. A tall rigid case and a long folded stroller put pressure on different parts of the box. Equal volume cannot tell you which will fit, and for skis the stated ski rating is still the safer guide.

03

On weight, it is close to a tie

The weight gap is unlikely to change how removal feels, while the width could count next to a bike rack. Both are approximately 43-pound shells with dual-side access and PowerClick mounting. Let the tightest vehicle or cargo dimension decide.

Check these before you buy

  • Get the dimensions of your longest and tallest cargo before settling on a shell.
  • Look up the fit guide for your exact vehicle and crossbars, then add up the weight of the rack, empty box and luggage.

What this page can’t tell you

  • Wind noise, fuel use and the way a given bag packs around the mounting hardware are things cargo dimensions and manufacturer load ratings cannot predict.

By the numbers

What the data shows

What we found across the roof cargo boxes we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.

How many fit

18 of the 26 models checked meet every need here: “Haul camping gear” and “Load from both sides”.

18 models fit, out of 26 checked
Show the facts and the math
Models in the comparison
26 models
Sources
2 covering these models
Product data updated

How we countedThe count uses each product's current fit ratings for “Haul camping gear” and “Load from both sides”. A need with no documented match is not counted.

The facts and sources behind each product in this recommendation
ProductNeeds it meetsFacts we checkedSources
Thule Motion 3 L
  • Haul camping gear
  • Load from both sides
  • Capacity is 16 cubic feet.
  • Gear up to 180 centimeters long fits inside.
  • Dualside access is how it opens.
Thule Force 3 L
  • Haul camping gear
  • Load from both sides
  • Capacity is 16 cubic feet.
  • Gear up to 175 centimeters long fits.
  • Dualside access is how it opens.

Ready to buy

See today’s price and what owners say

Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

Each link opens in a new tab.

We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money