The catch
Kawai ES520
Confirm the delivery timing before you schedule lessons around this exact offer.
Side by side
Pick the ES920 for two-part recording and audio files saved to USB memory. Lighter carrying and an action you like are the reasons to go with the ES520, if they matter more than those recording features.
Before you buy
Without the music rest, each measures 1340 by 375 mm, and with it the depth is 430 mm. That means the ES920's audio recorder and different action fit within the same published footprint. Room still has to be measured separately for the bench, stand and cable route.
Where this comes from
Listed width: ES520 1340 mm, ES920 1340 mm. Depth before music rest: ES520 375 mm, ES920 375 mm. Depth with music rest: ES520 430 mm, ES920 430 mm. This is a conditional workflow inference drawn from these documented inputs. There is no matched performance measurement.
The catch
Confirm the delivery timing before you schedule lessons around this exact offer.
The catch
Recording audio to a USB flash drive does not make the piano a live USB audio interface.


We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money
Kawai ES520 vs Kawai ES920, compared on keyboard mechanism, listed instrument weight and depth before music rest, along with the practice routines that decide the better choice.
Listed width and depth are the same on these Kawai portables, and both include an F-10H half-pedal. The ES920 brings a more capable recording workflow and a different action, at a higher carrying weight.
Which one fits
Without the music rest, each measures 1340 by 375 mm, and with it the depth is 430 mm. That means the ES920's audio recorder and different action fit within the same published footprint. Room still has to be measured separately for the bench, stand and cable route.
Each of three songs on the ES520 holds one recorded part. The ES920 gives you two parts and ten songs, along with WAV and MP3 audio recording to USB memory. For layering a practice part and exporting the actual sound without an external recorder, that makes the ES920 the more useful option.
Without their rests, the weights are 14.5 and 17 kg, so the ES920 adds 2.5 kg to the same wide load. If you carry the piano between rooms every day, you may prefer the ES520 even though the ES920's features are attractive. The selected white ES520 offer showed a long dispatch estimate, so check delivery before you settle on it.
F-10H comes with both. That need by itself is no reason to move up to the ES920.
In practice
Without the music rest, each measures 1340 by 375 mm, and with it the depth is 430 mm. That means the ES920's audio recorder and different action fit within the same published footprint. Room still has to be measured separately for the bench, stand and cable route.
Listed width: ES520 1340 mm, ES920 1340 mm. Depth before music rest: ES520 375 mm, ES920 375 mm. Depth with music rest: ES520 430 mm, ES920 430 mm. This is a conditional workflow inference drawn from these documented inputs. There is no matched performance measurement.
Each of three songs on the ES520 holds one recorded part. The ES920 gives you two parts and ten songs, along with WAV and MP3 audio recording to USB memory. For layering a practice part and exporting the actual sound without an external recorder, that makes the ES920 the more useful option.
Internal recorder tracks: ES520 1, ES920 2. Audio recording to USB memory: ES520 No, ES920 Yes. This is a conditional workflow inference drawn from these documented inputs. There is no matched performance measurement.
Without their rests, the weights are 14.5 and 17 kg, so the ES920 adds 2.5 kg to the same wide load. If you carry the piano between rooms every day, you may prefer the ES520 even though the ES920's features are attractive. The selected white ES520 offer showed a long dispatch estimate, so check delivery before you settle on it.
Listed instrument weight: ES520 14.5 kg (without music rest), ES920 17 kg (without music rest). Weight basis: ES520 without music rest, ES920 without music rest. This is a conditional workflow inference drawn from these documented inputs. There is no matched performance measurement.

Kawai, ES520
Kawai's portable format gains Four Hands mode and an included F-10H pedal in the ES520. At the time of checking, the selected white offer could be ordered, and it carried a four-to-five-week dispatch estimate.

Kawai, ES920
Within the same listed footprint as the ES520, the ES920 packs a two-part recorder, USB audio-file recording and the included half-pedal. Its 17 kg body is heavier to carry.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Kawai ES520 | Kawai ES920 | In practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keyboard mechanism | Responsive Hammer Compact II | Responsive Hammer III | Try out the documented mechanism before taking its name as a guarantee about feel or mechanical noise. |
| Listed instrument weight | 14.5 kg (without music rest) | 17 kg (without music rest) | Work out the load you will be moving from the stated measurement basis, and then add the stand, case and accessories. |
| Depth before music rest | 375 mm | 375 mm | The music rest, cable route and comfortable playing clearance are all left out of bare depth. |
| Internal recorder tracks | 1 | 2 | A large number by itself counts for less than track allocation and independent overdubbing. |
| Audio recording to USB memory | No | Yes | Live USB audio to a computer is not the same workflow as saving an audio file to a drive. |
Trade-offs
Change of plan
Go with Kawai ES520. Without their rests, the weights are 14.5 and 17 kg, so the ES920 adds 2.5 kg to the same wide load. If you carry the piano between rooms every day, you may prefer the ES520 even though the ES920's features are attractive. The selected white ES520 offer showed a long dispatch estimate, so check delivery before you settle on it.
Go with Kawai ES920. Without the music rest, each measures 1340 by 375 mm, and with it the depth is 430 mm. That means the ES920's audio recorder and different action fit within the same published footprint. Room still has to be measured separately for the bench, stand and cable route.
Neither model fits. Manufacturer records contain no matched test for those outcomes. Try the instruments under the conditions you intend to play in.
Decision guide
Without the music rest, each measures 1340 by 375 mm, and with it the depth is 430 mm. That means the ES920's audio recorder and different action fit within the same published footprint. Room still has to be measured separately for the bench, stand and cable route.
Each of three songs on the ES520 holds one recorded part. The ES920 gives you two parts and ten songs, along with WAV and MP3 audio recording to USB memory. For layering a practice part and exporting the actual sound without an external recorder, that makes the ES920 the more useful option.
Without their rests, the weights are 14.5 and 17 kg, so the ES920 adds 2.5 kg to the same wide load. If you carry the piano between rooms every day, you may prefer the ES520 even though the ES920's features are attractive. The selected white ES520 offer showed a long dispatch estimate, so check delivery before you settle on it.
By the numbers
What we found across the digital pianos we compare, plus the checked facts behind each finding.
| Product | Needs it meets | Facts we checked | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kawai ES520 |
|
| |
| Kawai ES920 |
|
|
Ready to buy
Open either model on Amazon for the current price, customer reviews and delivery options.

You carry the piano around a lot and the listed delivery timing works for you
See price & reviews on Amazon
You want more recording tools that fit the same measured space
See price & reviews on AmazonEach link opens in a new tab.
We may earn a commission from qualifying Amazon purchases. How we make money